Suppr超能文献

重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂预防遗传性血管性水肿:一项 2 期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验。

Recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor for prophylaxis of hereditary angio-oedema: a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Clinic of Dermatology, Medical University Skopje, Skopje, Macedonia.

出版信息

Lancet. 2017 Sep 30;390(10102):1595-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31963-3. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angio-oedema is a recurrent, oedematous disorder caused by deficiency of functional C1 inhibitor. Infusions of plasma-derived C1 esterase inhibitor deter attacks of hereditary angio-oedema, but the prophylactic effect of recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor has not been rigorously studied. We aimed to assess the efficacy of recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor for prophylaxis of hereditary angio-oedema.

METHODS

We conducted this phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial at ten centres in Canada, the Czech Republic, Israel, Italy, Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, and the USA. We enrolled patients aged 13 years or older with functional C1-inhibitor concentrations of less than 50% of normal and a history of four or more attacks of hereditary angio-oedema per month for at least 3 months before study initiation. Patients were randomly assigned centrally (1:1:1:1:1:1), via an interactive response technology system with fixed allocation, to receive one of six treatment sequences. During each sequence, patients received intravenous recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor (50 IU/kg; maximum 4200 IU) twice weekly, recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor once weekly and placebo once weekly, and placebo twice weekly, each for 4 weeks with a 1 week washout period between crossover. All patients, investigators, and study personnel who participated in patient care were masked to group allocation during the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of attacks of hereditary angio-oedema observed in each 4 week treatment period. Attack symptoms were recorded daily. The primary efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one injection of study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02247739.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 29, 2014, and May 3, 2016, we enrolled 35 patients, of whom 32 (91%) underwent randomisation (intention-to-treat population) and 26 (81%) completed the study. The mean number of attacks of hereditary angio-oedema over 4 weeks was significantly reduced with recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor twice weekly (2·7 attacks [SD 2·4]) and once weekly (4·4 attacks [3·2]) versus placebo (7·2 attacks [3·6]), with mean differences of -4·4 attacks (p<0·0001) and -2·8 attacks (p=0·0004), respectively. We recorded adverse events in ten (34%) of 29 patients given twice-weekly recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor, 13 (45%) of 29 patients given the once-weekly regimen, and eight (29%) of 28 patients given placebo. Headache (twice-weekly treatment) and nasopharyngitis (once-weekly treatment) were the most common adverse events. Two (7%) adverse events (fatigue and headache) were deemed possibly related to treatment with recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor, but both resolved without additional treatment. No thrombotic or thromboembolic events, systemic allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis), or neutralising antibodies were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Prophylaxis with recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor provided clinically relevant reductions in frequency of hereditary angio-oedema attacks and was well tolerated. In view of the pharmacokinetic profile of recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor, our results suggest that efficacy of C1-inhibitor replacement therapy might not be a direct function of plasma trough concentrations of C1 inhibitor.

FUNDING

Pharming Technologies.

摘要

背景

遗传性血管性水肿是一种反复发作的水肿性疾病,由功能性 C1 抑制剂缺乏引起。血浆衍生的 C1 酯酶抑制剂输注可阻止遗传性血管性水肿发作,但重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂的预防效果尚未经过严格研究。我们旨在评估重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂预防遗传性血管性水肿的疗效。

方法

我们在加拿大、捷克共和国、以色列、意大利、马其顿、罗马尼亚、塞尔维亚和美国的 10 个中心进行了这项 2 期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验。我们招募了年龄在 13 岁及以上、功能性 C1 抑制剂浓度低于正常水平的 50%且在研究开始前至少 3 个月每月有 4 次或以上遗传性血管性水肿发作史的患者。患者通过交互式反应技术系统以固定分配的方式被随机分配(1:1:1:1:1:1)接受 6 种治疗序列中的一种。在每个序列中,患者每周接受两次静脉内重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂(50IU/kg;最大 4200IU)、每周一次重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂和每周一次安慰剂以及每周两次安慰剂,每个治疗周期为 4 周,交叉洗脱期为 1 周。所有患者、研究者和参与患者护理的研究人员在研究期间对分组情况均保持盲态。主要疗效终点是每个 4 周治疗期内观察到的遗传性血管性水肿发作次数。每天记录发作症状。主要疗效分析在意向治疗人群中进行。对至少接受一次研究药物注射的所有患者进行了安全性评估。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02247739。

结果

2014 年 12 月 29 日至 2016 年 5 月 3 日期间,我们共招募了 35 名患者,其中 32 名(91%)接受了随机分组(意向治疗人群),26 名(81%)完成了研究。每周两次接受重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂和每周一次接受重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂的遗传性血管性水肿发作次数在 4 周内显著减少,分别为 2.7 次(2.4 次)和 4.4 次(3.2 次),与安慰剂相比,分别减少了 4.4 次(p<0.0001)和 2.8 次(p=0.0004)。我们记录了 29 名接受每周两次重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂治疗的患者中的 10 名(34%)、29 名接受每周一次治疗的患者中的 13 名(45%)和 28 名接受安慰剂治疗的患者中的 8 名(29%)发生的不良事件。最常见的不良事件是头痛(每周两次治疗)和鼻咽炎(每周一次治疗)。2 例(7%)不良事件(疲劳和头痛)被认为可能与重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂治疗有关,但均无需额外治疗即可缓解。未报告血栓或血栓栓塞事件、全身性过敏反应(包括过敏反应)或中和抗体。

解释

重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂的预防性治疗可显著降低遗传性血管性水肿发作的频率,且耐受性良好。鉴于重组人 C1 酯酶抑制剂的药代动力学特征,我们的结果表明,C1 抑制剂替代治疗的疗效可能不是 C1 抑制剂血浆浓度的直接函数。

资金

Phaarming Technologies。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验