Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute and MC Slotervaart, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1212-1221. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0167. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
Most monoclonal antibodies in oncology are administered in body-size-based dosing schedules. This is believed to correct for variability in both drug distribution and elimination between patients. However, monoclonal antibodies typically distribute to the blood plasma and extracellular fluids only, which increase less than proportionally with the increase in body weight. Elimination takes place via proteolytic catabolism, a nonspecific immunoglobulin G elimination pathway, and intracellular degradation after binding to the target. The latter is the primary route of elimination and is related to target expression levels rather than body size. Taken together, the minor effects of body size on distribution and elimination of monoclonal antibodies and their usually wide therapeutic window do not support body-size-based dosing. We evaluated effects of body weight on volume of distribution and clearance of monoclonal antibodies in oncology and show that a fixed dose for most of these drugs is justified based on pharmacokinetics. A survey of the savings after fixed dosing of monoclonal antibodies at our hospital showed that fixed dosing can reduce costs of health care, especially when pooling of preparations is not possible (which is often the case in smaller hospitals). In conclusion, based on pharmacokinetic parameters of monoclonal antibodies, there is a rationale for fixed dosing of these drugs in oncology. Therefore, we believe that fixed dosing is justified and can improve efficiency of the compounding. Moreover, drug spillage can be reduced and medication errors may become less likely.
The currently available knowledge of elimination of monoclonal antibodies combined with the publicly available data from clinical trials and extensive population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling justifies fixed dosing. Interpatient variation in exposure is comparable after body weight and fixed dosing and most monoclonal antibodies show relatively flat dose-response relationships. For monoclonal antibodies, this results in wide therapeutic windows and no reduced clinical efficacy after fixed dosing. Therefore, we believe that fixed dosing at a well-selected dose can increase medication safety and help in reduction of costs of health care without the loss of efficacy or safety margins.
大多数肿瘤学中的单克隆抗体都是根据体表面积给药的。这被认为可以纠正药物在患者之间分布和消除的变异性。然而,单克隆抗体通常仅分布到血浆和细胞外液中,而这些液体积聚的增加与体重的增加不成比例。消除是通过蛋白水解代谢、非特异性免疫球蛋白 G 消除途径以及与靶标结合后的细胞内降解来进行的。后者是主要的消除途径,与靶标表达水平有关,而与体重无关。总之,单克隆抗体在分布和消除方面的体重影响较小,以及它们通常较宽的治疗窗并不支持基于体表面积的给药。我们评估了体重对肿瘤学中单克隆抗体分布和清除率的影响,结果表明,根据药代动力学,大多数此类药物的固定剂量是合理的。我们医院对单克隆抗体固定剂量后的节省情况进行了调查,结果表明,固定剂量可以降低医疗保健成本,特别是在无法进行制剂混合(这在较小的医院中通常是不可能的)的情况下。总之,基于单克隆抗体的药代动力学参数,这些药物有理由进行固定剂量给药。因此,我们认为固定剂量是合理的,可以提高制剂的效率。此外,药物溢出可以减少,用药错误可能会减少。
结合临床试验和广泛的群体药代动力学(PopPK)模型中可获得的消除知识,目前可用于单克隆抗体的知识支持固定剂量。在体重和固定剂量后,暴露的个体间变异性是可比的,并且大多数单克隆抗体显示出相对平坦的剂量反应关系。对于单克隆抗体,这导致治疗窗较宽,并且在固定剂量后不会降低临床疗效。因此,我们认为,在精心选择的剂量下进行固定剂量给药可以提高用药安全性,并有助于降低医疗保健成本,而不会降低疗效或安全边际。