Department of Clinical Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, PO Box 90203, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Feb;43(1):181-190. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01131-z. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Background There is a strong rationale for fixed-dosing of monoclonal antibodies in oncology. Although fixed-dosing of recently introduced monoclonal antibodies is well accepted, the rationale is also applicable for other monoclonal antibodies that already have been used for years, but are still body-size-based dosed in many hospitals. In the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL), fixed-dosing has been implemented now for all monoclonal antibodies and, therefore, this site offers an ideal opportunity for a cost analysis study. Objective To investigate the financial impact of switching to fixed-dosing in the NKI-AVL. Setting The NKI-AVL. Method Information on the preparations of monoclonal antibodies was collected from August 2017 to February 2020. We compared the number of vials needed during preparation for fixed-dosing and body-size -based dosing strategies. The economic impact was calculated for 2 scenarios: scenario 1 assumed clustering of all preparations per day and scenario 2 assumed no clustering of preparations. Main outcome measure Number of saved vials and the correlating savings in health care costs. Results The implementation of fixed-dosing resulted in a substantial reduction in vials used for almost all monoclonal antibodies. The economic savings were calculated to be €0,8 and €3,1 million per year for scenario 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion Fixed-dosing resulted in substantial savings in health care costs.
背景
在肿瘤学中,单抗固定剂量给药具有很强的理论基础。虽然最近推出的单抗固定剂量给药已被广泛接受,但该理论同样适用于其他已使用多年但在许多医院仍基于体表面积给药的单抗。荷兰癌症研究所-安东尼范列文虎克医院(NKI-AVL)现已对所有单抗实施固定剂量给药,因此该医院为成本分析研究提供了理想的机会。
目的
评估 NKI-AVL 切换至固定剂量给药的财务影响。
设置
NKI-AVL。
方法
从 2017 年 8 月至 2020 年 2 月,收集了关于单抗制剂的信息。我们比较了固定剂量给药和体表面积剂量给药策略下准备所需的小瓶数量。为 2 种情况计算了经济影响:方案 1 假设每天所有制剂聚类,方案 2 假设制剂不聚类。
主要结局指标
节省的小瓶数量以及相关的医疗保健成本节约。
结果
固定剂量给药的实施导致几乎所有单抗的小瓶用量大幅减少。方案 1 和 2 下每年的节省成本分别为 80 万欧元和 310 万欧元。
结论
固定剂量给药可显著节省医疗保健成本。