Department of Biomedical Engineering, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, Room 3.358, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2018 Feb;17(1):55-69. doi: 10.1007/s10237-017-0944-0. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
Quantification of the uncertainty in constitutive model predictions describing arterial wall mechanics is vital towards non-invasive assessment of vascular drug therapies. Therefore, we perform uncertainty quantification to determine uncertainty in mechanical characteristics describing the vessel wall response upon loading. Furthermore, a global variance-based sensitivity analysis is performed to pinpoint measurements that are most rewarding to be measured more precisely. We used previously published carotid diameter-pressure and intima-media thickness (IMT) data (measured in triplicate), and Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden models. A virtual data set containing 5000 diastolic and systolic diameter-pressure points, and IMT values was generated by adding measurement error to the average of the measured data. The model was fitted to single-exponential curves calculated from the data, obtaining distributions of constitutive parameters and constituent load bearing parameters. Additionally, we (1) simulated vascular drug treatment to assess the relevance of model uncertainty and (2) evaluated how increasing the number of measurement repetitions influences model uncertainty. We found substantial uncertainty in constitutive parameters. Simulating vascular drug treatment predicted a 6% point reduction in collagen load bearing ([Formula: see text]), approximately 50% of its uncertainty. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the uncertainty in [Formula: see text] was primarily caused by noise in distension and IMT measurements. Spread in [Formula: see text] could be decreased by 50% when increasing the number of measurement repetitions from 3 to 10. Model uncertainty, notably that in [Formula: see text], could conceal effects of vascular drug therapy. However, this uncertainty could be reduced by increasing the number of measurement repetitions of distension and wall thickness measurements used for model parameterisation.
量化本构模型预测中描述动脉壁力学的不确定性对于血管药物治疗的无创评估至关重要。因此,我们进行不确定性量化,以确定描述血管壁在加载下响应的机械特性的不确定性。此外,还进行了全局基于方差的敏感性分析,以确定最值得更精确测量的测量值。我们使用了先前发表的颈动脉直径-压力和内膜中层厚度 (IMT) 数据(重复测量了三次)和 Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden 模型。通过向测量数据的平均值添加测量误差,生成了包含 5000 个舒张和收缩直径-压力点和 IMT 值的虚拟数据集。通过将模型拟合到从数据计算的单指数曲线,获得本构参数和组成承载参数的分布。此外,我们 (1) 模拟了血管药物治疗,以评估模型不确定性的相关性,以及 (2) 评估增加测量重复次数如何影响模型不确定性。我们发现本构参数存在很大的不确定性。模拟血管药物治疗预测胶原承载减少 6%点 ([Formula: see text]),约为其不确定性的 50%。敏感性分析表明,[Formula: see text]的不确定性主要是由膨胀和 IMT 测量的噪声引起的。当将测量重复次数从 3 增加到 10 时,[Formula: see text]的分散度可以降低 50%。模型不确定性,特别是 [Formula: see text] 的不确定性,可能会掩盖血管药物治疗的效果。然而,通过增加用于模型参数化的膨胀和壁厚测量的测量重复次数,可以降低这种不确定性。