Suppr超能文献

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受二甲双胍治疗 4 个月与安慰剂对照的 2 年随访:来自 GIPS-III RCT 的数据。

Two-year follow-up of 4 months metformin treatment vs. placebo in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: data from the GIPS-III RCT.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Dec;106(12):939-946. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1140-z. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Preclinical and clinical studies suggested cardioprotective effects of metformin treatment. In the GIPS-III trial, 4 months of metformin treatment did not improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Here, we report the 2-year follow-up results.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and May 2013, 379 STEMI patients without diabetes undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to a 4-month treatment with metformin (500 mg twice daily) (N = 191) or placebo (N = 188) in the University Medical Center Groningen. Two-year follow-up data was collected to determine its effect on predefined secondary endpoints: the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), its individual components, all-cause mortality, and new-onset diabetes.

RESULTS

For all 379 patients all-cause mortality data were available. For seven patients (2%) follow-up data on MACE was limited, ranging from 129 to 577 days. All others completed the 2-year follow-up visit. Incidence of MACE was 11 (5.8%) in metformin and 6 (3.2%) in placebo treated patients [hazard ratio (HR) 1.84, confidence interval (CI) 0.68-4.97, P = 0.22]. Three patients died in the metformin group and one in the placebo treatment group. Individual components of MACE were also comparable between both groups. New-onset diabetes mellitus was 34 (17.8%) in metformin and 32 (17.0%) in placebo treated patients (odds ratio 1.15, CI 0.66-1.98, P = 0.84). After multivariable adjustment the incidence of MACE was comparable between the treatment groups (HR 1.02, CI 0.10-10.78, P = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Four months metformin treatment initiated at the time of hospitalization in STEMI patients without diabetes did not exert beneficial long-term effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01217307.

摘要

目的

临床前和临床研究表明二甲双胍治疗具有心脏保护作用。在 GIPS-III 试验中,4 个月的二甲双胍治疗并未改善 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的左心室射血分数。在此,我们报告 2 年随访结果。

方法

2011 年 1 月至 2013 年 5 月,379 例无糖尿病的 STEMI 患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,随机分为二甲双胍(500mg,每日两次)治疗 4 个月(n=191)或安慰剂治疗(n=188)的大学医学中心格罗宁根组。收集了 2 年随访数据,以确定其对预设次要终点的影响:主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率、其各个组成部分、全因死亡率和新发糖尿病。

结果

所有 379 例患者均有全因死亡率数据。7 例(2%)患者的 MACE 随访数据有限,范围为 129 至 577 天。其余所有人均完成了 2 年的随访。二甲双胍组的 MACE 发生率为 11 例(5.8%),安慰剂组为 6 例(3.2%)[风险比(HR)1.84,置信区间(CI)0.68-4.97,P=0.22]。二甲双胍组有 3 例患者死亡,安慰剂组有 1 例患者死亡。两组的 MACE 各个组成部分也相似。二甲双胍组新发糖尿病 34 例(17.8%),安慰剂组 32 例(17.0%)[比值比(OR)1.15,置信区间(CI)0.66-1.98,P=0.84]。多变量调整后,两组的 MACE 发生率无差异(HR 1.02,CI 0.10-10.78,P=0.99)。

结论

在无糖尿病的 STEMI 患者住院时开始进行 4 个月的二甲双胍治疗并未产生有益的长期效果。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01217307。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3079/5696505/b8074a861b9d/392_2017_1140_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验