• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分诊护士和急诊医生对儿童头部创伤C-3PO规则解读的可靠性

Reliability of Triage Nurses and Emergency Physicians for the Interpretation of the C-3PO Rule for Head Trauma in Children.

作者信息

Gravel Jocelyn, Gouin Serge, Canuel Annie, Mâsse Benoît

机构信息

Montréal, Canada.

Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Mar;44(2):164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2017.06.013
PMID:28755763
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The C-3PO rule has been validated for use by emergency physicians to identify young children at risk of skull fracture following head trauma. The use of the rule by triage nurses could improve patient flow in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the interobserver agreement of triage nurses and emergency physicians in the interpretation of the C-3PO rule in a pediatric emergency department.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study performed in a consecutive sample of children visiting a single emergency department. Participants were all children younger than 24 months of age who presented at the emergency department for head trauma that had occurred in the previous 24 hours. The primary outcome was the interobserver agreement between nurses and emergency physicians as to whether the child was at high risk of skull fracture according to the interpretation of the C-3PO rule. All study participants were evaluated sequentially by a triage nurse and an emergency physician. Outcome of evaluation was kept blinded between nurses and physicians. The primary analysis was the interrater reliability using the kappa score. The sample size was set to provide lower boundary of 0.70 for a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for kappa coefficient of at least 0.80.

RESULTS

A total of 226 children were evaluated by a physician and a nurse. Among them, 10 had skull fractures. A total of 34 nurses and 42 physicians evaluated between 1 and 21 children. The interrater reliability was excellent, as demonstrated by a kappa score of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.92). Moreover, all children with skull fractures were categorized at "high risk" by the nurse and the physician.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates an almost perfect interrater reliability between triage nurses and emergency physicians in interpreting the C-3PO rule when evaluating children who presented at an emergency department for head trauma. Contribution to Emergency Nursing Practice.

摘要

引言

C-3PO 规则已被证实可供急诊医生用于识别头部外伤后有颅骨骨折风险的幼儿。分诊护士使用该规则可改善急诊科的患者流程。

目的

评估儿科急诊科分诊护士和急诊医生在解读 C-3PO 规则方面的观察者间一致性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,对连续就诊于单一急诊科的儿童样本进行研究。参与者为所有 24 个月以下、因前 24 小时内发生的头部外伤而到急诊科就诊的儿童。主要结局是护士和急诊医生根据 C-3PO 规则的解读判断儿童是否有高颅骨骨折风险的观察者间一致性。所有研究参与者均由分诊护士和急诊医生依次进行评估。护士和医生之间对评估结果保持盲态。主要分析是使用卡帕分数的评分者间信度。样本量设定为使卡帕系数至少为 0.80 的 95%置信区间(95%CI)的下限为 0.70。

结果

共有 226 名儿童由医生和护士进行了评估。其中,10 名儿童有颅骨骨折。共有 34 名护士和 42 名医生评估了 1 至 21 名儿童。评分者间信度极佳,卡帕分数为 0.85(95%CI:0.77 - 0.92)。此外,所有有颅骨骨折的儿童被护士和医生均归类为“高风险”。

结论

本研究表明,在评估因头部外伤到急诊科就诊的儿童时,分诊护士和急诊医生在解读 C-3PO 规则方面具有几乎完美的评分者间信度。对急诊护理实践的贡献。

相似文献

1
Reliability of Triage Nurses and Emergency Physicians for the Interpretation of the C-3PO Rule for Head Trauma in Children.分诊护士和急诊医生对儿童头部创伤C-3PO规则解读的可靠性
J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Mar;44(2):164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
2
Derivation and validation of a clinical decision rule to identify young children with skull fracture following isolated head trauma.一个临床决策规则的推导和验证,用于识别孤立性头部创伤后颅骨骨折的幼儿。
CMAJ. 2015 Nov 3;187(16):1202-1208. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150540. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
3
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.
4
Prehospital Application of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale by Emergency Medical Services.紧急医疗服务机构对加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表的院前应用 。 (注:这里“acuity”结合语境可能是指“急症程度”之类的意思,但按照要求未做额外解释,直接保留原文词汇)
CJEM. 2017 Jan;19(1):26-31. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.345. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
5
Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients.儿科患者中急诊严重程度指数(第3版)分诊算法的评估
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;12(3):219-24. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.09.023.
6
Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.三级护理中心护士对加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表的评分者间一致性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale”,意为“ acuity 量表”,这里按推测翻译。)
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
7
Multicentre prospective validation of use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by triage nurses in the emergency department.多中心前瞻性验证分诊护士在急诊科使用加拿大颈椎规则。
CMAJ. 2010 Aug 10;182(11):1173-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091430. Epub 2010 May 10.
8
The Pittsburgh Decision Rule: triage nurse versus physician utilization in the emergency department.
J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;31(3):247-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.12.020.
9
Triaging the Emergency Department, Not the Patient: United States Emergency Nurses' Experience of the Triage Process.对急诊科进行分诊,而非对患者:美国急诊护士的分诊过程体验
J Emerg Nurs. 2018 May;44(3):258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Pediatric Pain Management in the Emergency Department: The Triage Nurses' Perspective.急诊科的儿科疼痛管理:分诊护士的观点。
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Sep;41(5):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 31.