Leeies Murdoch, Ffrench Cheryl, Strome Trevor, Weldon Erin, Bullard Michael, Grierson Rob
*Department of Emergency Medicine,University of Manitoba,Winnipeg,MB.
¶Department of Emergency Medicine,University of Alberta,Edmonton,AB.
CJEM. 2017 Jan;19(1):26-31. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.345. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
Triage is fundamental to emergency patient assessment. Effective triage systems accurately prioritize patients and help predict resource utilization. CTAS is a validated five-level triage score utilized in Emergency Departments (EDs) across Canada and internationally. Historically CTAS has been applied by triage nurses in EDs. Observational evidence suggests that the CTAS might be implemented reliably by paramedics in the prehospital setting. This is the first system-wide assessment of CTAS interrater reliability between paramedics and triage nurses during clinical practice.
Variables were extracted from hospital and EMS databases. EMS providers determined CTAS on-scene, CTAS pre-transport, and CTAS on-arrival at hospital for each patient (N=14,378). The hospital arrival EMS CTAS (CTAS arrival ) score was compared to the initial nursing CTAS score (CTAS initial ) and the final nursing CTAS score (CTAS final ) incuding nursing overrides. Interrater reliability between ED CTAS initial and EMS CTAS arrival scores was assessed. Interrater reliability between ED CTAS final and EMS CTAS arrival scores, as well as proportion of patient encounters with perfect or near-perfect agreement, were evaluated.
Our primary outcome, interrater reliability [kappa=0.437 (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.421-0.452)], indicated moderate agreement. EMS CTAS arrival and ED CTAS initial scores had an exact or within one point match 84.3% of the time. The secondary interrater reliability outcome between hospital arrival EMS CTAS (CTAS arrival ) score and the final ED triage CTAS score (CTAS final ) showed moderate agreement with kappa =0.452 (p<0.001, 95% CI 0.437-0.466).
Interrater reliability of CTAS scoring between triage nurses and paramedics was moderate in this system-wide implementation study.
分诊是急诊患者评估的基础。有效的分诊系统能准确地对患者进行优先级排序,并有助于预测资源利用情况。加拿大分诊和急重症评分系统(CTAS)是一种经过验证的五级分诊评分系统,在加拿大及国际范围内的急诊科(ED)中使用。历史上,CTAS一直由急诊科的分诊护士应用。观察性证据表明,护理人员在院前环境中可能能够可靠地实施CTAS。这是首次在临床实践中对护理人员和分诊护士之间CTAS评分者间信度进行全系统评估。
从医院和紧急医疗服务(EMS)数据库中提取变量。EMS提供者为每位患者确定现场CTAS、转运前CTAS和到达医院时的CTAS(N = 14378)。将到达医院时的EMS CTAS(CTAS到达)评分与初始护理CTAS评分(CTAS初始)以及最终护理CTAS评分(CTAS最终,包括护理人员的调整)进行比较。评估急诊CTAS初始评分与EMS CTAS到达评分之间的评分者间信度。评估急诊CTAS最终评分与EMS CTAS到达评分之间的评分者间信度,以及具有完全或近乎完全一致性的患者遭遇比例。
我们的主要结果,评分者间信度[kappa = 0.437(p < 0.001,95% CI 0.421 - 0.452)],表明一致性中等。EMS CTAS到达评分与急诊CTAS初始评分在84.3%的时间内完全匹配或相差不超过一分。到达医院时的EMS CTAS(CTAS到达)评分与最终急诊分诊CTAS评分(CTAS最终)之间的次要评分者间信度结果显示一致性中等,kappa = 0.452(p < 0.001,95% CI 0.437 - 0.466)。
在这项全系统实施研究中,分诊护士和护理人员之间CTAS评分的评分者间信度中等。