Suppr超能文献

针对因常见精神障碍而休病假患者的认知行为疗法及重返工作干预:一项随机对照试验

Cognitive-behavioural therapy and return-to-work intervention for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Salomonsson Sigrid, Santoft Fredrik, Lindsäter Elin, Ejeby Kersti, Ljótsson Brjánn, Öst Lars-Göran, Ingvar Martin, Lekander Mats, Hedman-Lagerlöf Erik

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), H1, Division of Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2017 Dec;74(12):905-912. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104342. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Common mental disorders (CMDs) cause great individual suffering and long-term sick leave. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) effectively treats CMDs, but sick leave is not reduced to the same extent as psychiatric symptoms. Research results regarding return-to-work interventions (RTW-Is) and their effect on sick leave are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to evaluate CBT, a RTW-I and combined CBT and RTW-I (COMBO) for primary care patients on sick leave due to CMDs.

METHODS

Patients with CMDs (n=211) were randomised to CBT (n=64), RTW-I (n=67) or COMBO (n=80). Sick-leave registry data after 1 year and blinded Clinician's Severity Rating (CSR) of symptoms post-treatment and at follow-ups after 6 and 12 months were primary outcomes.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between treatments in days on sick leave 1 year after treatment start (mean difference in sick-leave days range=9-27). CBT led to larger reduction of symptoms post-treatment (CSR; Cohen's d=0.4 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.8)) than RTW-I, whereas COMBO did not differ from CBT or RTW-I. At follow-up, after 1 year, there was no difference between groups. All treatments were associated with large pre-treatment to post-treatment improvements, and results were maintained at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

No treatment was superior to the other regarding reducing sick leave. All treatments effectively reduced symptoms, CBT in a faster pace than RTW-I, but at 1-year follow-up, all groups had similar symptom levels. Further research is needed regarding how CBT and RTW-I can be combined more efficiently to produce a larger effect on sick leave while maintaining effective symptom reduction.

摘要

目的

常见精神障碍(CMDs)给个人带来巨大痛苦并导致长期病假。认知行为疗法(CBT)能有效治疗CMDs,但病假天数并未像精神症状那样减少相同程度。关于重返工作干预措施(RTW-Is)及其对病假影响的研究结果尚无定论。本研究旨在评估针对因CMDs而休病假的初级保健患者的CBT、一种RTW-I以及CBT与RTW-I联合疗法(COMBO)。

方法

患有CMDs的患者(n = 211)被随机分为CBT组(n = 64)、RTW-I组(n = 67)或COMBO组(n = 80)。治疗开始1年后的病假登记数据以及治疗后和6个月及12个月随访时由盲法评定的临床医生症状严重程度评分(CSR)为主要结局指标。

结果

治疗开始1年后,各治疗组之间在病假天数上无显著差异(病假天数的平均差异范围为9 - 27天)。CBT治疗后症状减轻幅度大于RTW-I(CSR;Cohen's d = 0.4(95%CI 0.1至0.8)),而COMBO与CBT或RTW-I无差异。在1年随访时,各组之间无差异。所有治疗均与治疗前到治疗后的显著改善相关,且结果在1年随访时得以维持。

结论

在减少病假方面,没有一种治疗方法优于其他方法。所有治疗均有效减轻症状,CBT减轻症状的速度比RTW-I快,但在1年随访时,所有组的症状水平相似。需要进一步研究如何更有效地将CBT和RTW-I结合起来,在保持有效减轻症状的同时,对病假产生更大影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验