• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines 2016.

作者信息

Bullard Michael J, Musgrave Erin, Warren David, Unger Bernard, Skeldon Thora, Grierson Rob, van der Linde Etienne, Swain Janel

机构信息

*University of Alberta Hospital,University of Alberta,Edmonton,AB.

†Horizon Health Network,Miramichi,NB.

出版信息

CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(S2):S18-S27. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.365.

DOI:10.1017/cem.2017.365
PMID:28756800
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines 2016.《2016年加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表（CTAS）指南》修订版
CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(S2):S18-S27. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.365.
2
Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines.《加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表（CTAS）指南修订版》
CJEM. 2014 Nov;16(6):485-9.
3
Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department.加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表的可靠性：来自社区及学术性急诊科的评估者间和评估者内一致性
CJEM. 2013 Jul;15(4):227-32. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130943.
4
Guidance when Applying the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) to the Geriatric Patient: Executive Summary.将加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表（CTAS）应用于老年患者的指南：执行摘要。
CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(S2):S28-S37. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.363.
5
Comparison of Canadian triage acuity scale to Australian Emergency Mental Health Scale triage system for psychiatric patients.加拿大分诊 acuity 量表与澳大利亚急诊心理健康量表分诊系统在精神科患者中的比较。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2015 Apr;23(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
6
Meeting Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale benchmarks in a rural emergency department.在农村急诊科达到加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表基准。 （注：这里“acuity”可能是指“ acuity scale”中的“ acuity”，可理解为“急症程度”之类意思，结合语境整体翻译为上述内容，但单独“acuity”在医学语境有多种含义，比如“敏锐度”等 ）
Can J Rural Med. 2009 Summer;14(3):101-4.
7
Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines.《加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表（CTAS）成人指南》修订版。 （注：这里“acuity”可能是专业术语，比如“ acuity scale”可能是“急症严重程度量表”等，具体需结合医学专业知识准确理解，这里按字面翻译。）
CJEM. 2008 Mar;10(2):136-51. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500009854.
8
A determination of emergency department pre-triage times in patients not arriving by ambulance compared to widely used guideline recommendations.与广泛使用的指南建议相比，对非救护车送来患者的急诊科预分诊时间的测定。
CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(4):265-270. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.398. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement.加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表的可靠性：评分者间一致性
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Aug;34(2):155-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70223-4.
10
Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.加拿大急诊分诊和急症严重程度评分：在沙特阿拉伯一家三级护理中心的实施。
BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Feb 10;11:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of ChatGPT, Gemini and DeepSeek for non-critical triage support using real-world conversations in emergency department.ChatGPT、Gemini和DeepSeek在急诊科使用真实对话进行非关键分诊支持方面的表现。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01337-2.
2
Accuracy of Large Language Models in Detecting Cases Requiring Immediate Reporting in Pediatric Radiology: A Feasibility Study Using Publicly Available Clinical Vignettes.大语言模型在检测儿科放射学中需要立即报告的病例方面的准确性：一项使用公开临床病例摘要的可行性研究
Korean J Radiol. 2025 Sep;26(9):855-866. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2025.0240.
3
Development and internal validation of an AI-based emergency triage model for predicting critical outcomes in emergency department.
用于预测急诊科危急结局的基于人工智能的急诊分诊模型的开发与内部验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17180-1.
4
Aortic dissection in the ED: a medico-legal perspective on diagnostic delays and failures.急诊科的主动脉夹层：关于诊断延误和失误的法医学视角
CJEM. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00999-y.
5
Enhancing emergency department triage for older patients: a prospective study on the integration of the identification of seniors at risk.加强老年患者的急诊科分诊：一项关于整合高危老年人识别的前瞻性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01253-5.
6
Age and pupil size: key predictors of mortality in traumatic brain injury patients with GCS 3.年龄和瞳孔大小：格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为3分的创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的关键预测因素。
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 4;16:1536421. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1536421. eCollection 2025.
7
Triage decisions and health outcomes among oncology patients: a comparative study of medical and surgical cancer cases in emergency departments.肿瘤患者的分诊决策与健康结局：急诊科内科与外科癌症病例的比较研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 20;25(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01191-2.
8
Establishing Syndromic Surveillance of Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke: Registry Study Based on Routine Data From German Emergency Departments.建立急性冠状动脉综合征、心肌梗死和中风的症状监测：基于德国急诊科常规数据的登记研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Feb 25;11:e66218. doi: 10.2196/66218.
9
Machine learning outperforms the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in predicting need for early critical care.在预测早期重症监护需求方面，机器学习的表现优于加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表（CTAS）。
CJEM. 2025 Jan;27(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00807-z. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
10
Workflow and Short-Term Functional Outcomes in Simultaneous Acute Code Stroke Activation and Stroke Reperfusion Therapy.急性卒中同时激活与再灌注治疗的工作流程及短期功能预后
NeuroSci. 2024 Aug 22;5(3):291-300. doi: 10.3390/neurosci5030023. eCollection 2024 Sep.