• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Guidance when Applying the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) to the Geriatric Patient: Executive Summary.

作者信息

Bullard Michael J, Melady Don, Emond Marcel, Musgrave Erin, Unger Bernard, van der Linde Etienne, Grierson Rob, Skeldon Thora, Warren David, Swain Janel

机构信息

*University of Alberta Hospital,University of Alberta, Edmonton,AB.

†Mount Sinai Hospital,University of Toronto,Toronto,ON.

出版信息

CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(S2):S28-S37. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.363.

DOI:10.1017/cem.2017.363
PMID:28756798
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Guidance when Applying the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) to the Geriatric Patient: Executive Summary.将加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表（CTAS）应用于老年患者的指南：执行摘要。
CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(S2):S28-S37. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.363.
2
Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines 2016.《2016年加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表（CTAS）指南》修订版
CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(S2):S18-S27. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.365.
3
Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Guidelines.《加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表（CTAS）指南修订版》
CJEM. 2014 Nov;16(6):485-9.
4
Comparison of Canadian triage acuity scale to Australian Emergency Mental Health Scale triage system for psychiatric patients.加拿大分诊 acuity 量表与澳大利亚急诊心理健康量表分诊系统在精神科患者中的比较。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2015 Apr;23(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
5
The validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in predicting resource utilization and the need for immediate life-saving interventions in elderly emergency department patients.加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表在预测老年急诊患者资源利用和即时救命干预需求方面的有效性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Nov 3;19:68. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-68.
6
Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department.加拿大分诊与 acuity 量表的可靠性：来自社区及学术性急诊科的评估者间和评估者内一致性
CJEM. 2013 Jul;15(4):227-32. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.130943.
7
Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines.《加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表（CTAS）成人指南》修订版。 （注：这里“acuity”可能是专业术语，比如“ acuity scale”可能是“急症严重程度量表”等，具体需结合医学专业知识准确理解，这里按字面翻译。）
CJEM. 2008 Mar;10(2):136-51. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500009854.
8
Meeting Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale benchmarks in a rural emergency department.在农村急诊科达到加拿大急诊科分诊与 acuity 量表基准。 （注：这里“acuity”可能是指“ acuity scale”中的“ acuity”，可理解为“急症程度”之类意思，结合语境整体翻译为上述内容，但单独“acuity”在医学语境有多种含义，比如“敏锐度”等 ）
Can J Rural Med. 2009 Summer;14(3):101-4.
9
A determination of emergency department pre-triage times in patients not arriving by ambulance compared to widely used guideline recommendations.与广泛使用的指南建议相比，对非救护车送来患者的急诊科预分诊时间的测定。
CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(4):265-270. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.398. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
10
Validity of the Pediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale in a tertiary children's hospital in Israel.以色列一家三级儿童医院中儿科加拿大分诊 acuity 量表的有效性。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):270-273. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000464.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality prediction in geriatric patients with multiple trauma presenting by ambulance.老年多发伤患者经救护车转运时的死亡率预测
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Aug;31(8):739-746. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.42574.
2
Factors Influencing Mistriage Based on the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.基于韩国分诊与 acuity 量表的误诊影响因素：一项回顾性横断面研究。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2025 Sep;57(5):860-873. doi: 10.1111/jnu.70033. Epub 2025 Jul 6.
3
Triage decisions and health outcomes among oncology patients: a comparative study of medical and surgical cancer cases in emergency departments.
肿瘤患者的分诊决策与健康结局：急诊科内科与外科癌症病例的比较研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 20;25(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01191-2.
4
Admission prioritization of heart failure patients with multiple comorbidities.患有多种合并症的心力衰竭患者的入院优先级安排
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jul 2;6:1379336. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1379336. eCollection 2024.
5
Validation of the Korean Version of the Clinical Frailty Scale-Adjusted Korean Triage and Acuity Scale for Older Patients in the Emergency Department.中文译文：临床虚弱量表调整后的韩国分诊和急症严重程度量表在急诊科老年患者中的验证。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 8;60(6):955. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060955.
6
Geriatric Population Triage: The Risk of Real-Life Over- and Under-Triage in an Overcrowded ED: 4- and 5-Level Triage Systems Compared: The CREONTE (Crowding and R E Organization National TriagE) Study.老年人群体分诊：在拥挤的急诊科中现实生活中过度分诊和分诊不足的风险：4级和5级分诊系统比较：CREONTE（拥挤与重新组织国家分诊）研究
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 9;14(2):195. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020195.
7
Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high-risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study.评估interRAI急诊科筛查工具在识别高危老年急诊科患者方面的效用和准确性：一项加拿大多省前瞻性队列研究。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Jan 13;4(1):e12876. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12876. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Revising Vital Signs Criteria for Accurate Triage of Older Adults in the Emergency Department.修订急诊科老年患者准确分诊的生命体征标准。
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Jul 20;15:6227-6235. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S373396. eCollection 2022.
9
Using mobility status as a frailty indicator to improve the accuracy of a computerised five-level triage system among older patients in the emergency department.利用活动能力状态作为衰弱指标，提高计算机化五级别分诊系统在急诊科老年患者中的准确性。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 May 19;22(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00646-0.
10
Predictors of Admission in Adult Unscheduled Return Visits to the Emergency Department.成人非计划性急诊复诊入院的预测因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):912-918. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.8.38225. Epub 2018 Sep 10.