• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早发性与迟发性精神病及迟发性运动障碍

Early versus late onset psychosis and tardive dyskinesia.

作者信息

Yassa R, Nair V, Schwartz G

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;21(13):1291-7. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(86)90311-2.

DOI:10.1016/0006-3223(86)90311-2
PMID:2875744
Abstract

Patients with late-onset psychosis (defined as psychosis requiring hospitalization at age 45 or more, n = 20) were compared with early-onset psychosis patients (defined as psychosis requiring hospitalization at age 25 or less, n = 56) for the prevalence of tardive dyskinesia (TD). Late-onset psychosis patients were found to have significantly more TD (p less than 0.01), which was more severe (p less than 0.05) and developed in a relatively shorter period of neuroleptic treatment (p less than 0.001), than patients with early-onset psychosis. In addition, TD patients (irrespective of early or late onset of neuroleptic treatment) were found to show a preponderance of drug-free periods (p less than 0.01) in their past neuroleptic history, more so than non-TD patients. Our findings indicate that late-onset psychosis should be considered to be a risk factor for the development of TD.

摘要

对迟发性精神病患者(定义为45岁及以上需要住院治疗的精神病患者,n = 20)和早发性精神病患者(定义为25岁及以下需要住院治疗的精神病患者,n = 56)的迟发性运动障碍(TD)患病率进行了比较。结果发现,迟发性精神病患者的TD明显更多(p < 0.01),病情更严重(p < 0.05),且在相对较短的抗精神病药物治疗期内就出现了TD(p < 0.001),比早发性精神病患者更为明显。此外,TD患者(无论抗精神病药物治疗开始的早晚)在过去的抗精神病药物治疗史中无药期占优势(p < 0.01),比非TD患者更为显著。我们的研究结果表明,迟发性精神病应被视为TD发生的一个危险因素。

相似文献

1
Early versus late onset psychosis and tardive dyskinesia.早发性与迟发性精神病及迟发性运动障碍
Biol Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;21(13):1291-7. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(86)90311-2.
2
Tardive dyskinesia in older out-patients: a follow-up study.老年门诊患者的迟发性运动障碍:一项随访研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Sep;96(3):195-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10151.x.
3
The natural history of tardive dyskinesia.迟发性运动障碍的自然病史。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1988 Aug;8(4 Suppl):31S-37S.
4
Tardive dyskinesia: developmental factors.迟发性运动障碍:发育因素
Can J Psychiatry. 1985 Aug;30(5):344-7. doi: 10.1177/070674378503000508.
5
Comparison of severe and mild tardive dyskinesia: implications for etiology.重度与轻度迟发性运动障碍的比较:对病因学的启示
J Clin Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;48(9):359-62.
6
Risk factors for drug-induced parkinsonism in tardive dyskinesia patients.迟发性运动障碍患者药物性帕金森综合征的危险因素。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;49(4):139-41.
7
Clinical and epidemiologic aspects of tardive dyskinesia.迟发性运动障碍的临床与流行病学特征
J Clin Psychiatry. 1985 Apr;46(4 Pt 2):8-13.
8
Non-right-handedness and maleness correlate with tardive dyskinesia among patients taking neuroleptics.在服用抗精神病药物的患者中,非右利手和男性与迟发性运动障碍相关。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1990 Jun;81(6):530-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb05493.x.
9
A longitudinal study of correlations among tardive dyskinesia, drug-induced parkinsonism, and psychosis.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1992 Winter;4(1):29-35. doi: 10.1176/jnp.4.1.29.
10
Focus on lower risk of tardive dyskinesia with atypical antipsychotics.关注非典型抗精神病药物导致迟发性运动障碍的风险较低这一特点。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jan-Mar;18(1):57-62. doi: 10.1080/10401230500464737.

引用本文的文献

1
Current perspectives on the epidemiology and burden of tardive dyskinesia: a focused review of the clinical situation in Japan.迟发性运动障碍的流行病学和负担的当前观点:对日本临床情况的重点综述
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2022 Dec 26;12:20451253221139608. doi: 10.1177/20451253221139608. eCollection 2022.
2
Drug-induced movement disorders.药物性运动障碍
Drug Saf. 1997 Mar;16(3):180-204. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199716030-00004.
3
Tardive dystonia. Prevalence, risk factors, and comparison with tardive dyskinesia in a population of 200 acute psychiatric inpatients.
迟发性肌张力障碍。200例急性精神科住院患者的患病率、危险因素及与迟发性运动障碍的比较
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1995;245(3):145-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02193087.