• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在非社会目标中感知情绪:特质共情对通过艺术产生的情绪感染的影响。

Perceiving emotion in non-social targets: The effect of trait empathy on emotional contagion through art.

作者信息

Stavrova Olga, Meckel Andrea

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Motiv Emot. 2017;41(4):492-509. doi: 10.1007/s11031-017-9619-5. Epub 2017 May 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11031-017-9619-5
PMID:28757668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5509827/
Abstract

This research examines the role of trait empathy in emotional contagion through non-social targets-art objects. Studies 1a and 1b showed that high- (compared to low-) empathy individuals are more likely to infer an artist's emotions based on the emotional valence of the artwork and, as a result, are more likely to experience the respective emotions themselves. Studies 2a and 2b experimentally manipulated artists' emotions via revealing details about their personal life. Study 3 experimentally induced positive vs. negative emotions in individuals who then wrote literary texts. These texts were shown to another sample of participants. High- (compared to low-) empathy participants were more like to accurately identify and take on the emotions ostensibly (Studies 2a and 2b) or actually (Study 3) experienced by the "artists". High-empathy individuals' enhanced sensitivity to others' emotions is not restricted to social targets, such as faces, but extends to products of the human mind, such as objects of art.

摘要

本研究通过非社会目标——艺术品,考察了特质共情在情绪感染中的作用。研究1a和1b表明,高共情(与低共情相比)个体更有可能根据艺术品的情感效价推断艺术家的情绪,因此,他们自己更有可能体验到相应的情绪。研究2a和2b通过揭示艺术家的个人生活细节,对艺术家的情绪进行了实验性操纵。研究3对个体进行实验诱导,使其产生积极或消极情绪,然后让他们撰写文学文本。这些文本被展示给另一组参与者。高共情(与低共情相比)参与者更有可能准确识别并呈现出“艺术家”表面上(研究2a和2b)或实际(研究3)体验到的情绪。高共情个体对他人情绪增强的敏感性不仅限于社会目标,如面部,还延伸到人类思维的产物,如艺术品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/8b569dcaf458/11031_2017_9619_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/e87b8df99c5d/11031_2017_9619_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/c58edef2bc77/11031_2017_9619_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/ba39ba5403ae/11031_2017_9619_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/1c40a27d1649/11031_2017_9619_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/08fa42835fe2/11031_2017_9619_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/fe240eec9d4d/11031_2017_9619_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/a81f3a3785fa/11031_2017_9619_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/40b9d7dea728/11031_2017_9619_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/8b569dcaf458/11031_2017_9619_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/e87b8df99c5d/11031_2017_9619_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/c58edef2bc77/11031_2017_9619_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/ba39ba5403ae/11031_2017_9619_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/1c40a27d1649/11031_2017_9619_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/08fa42835fe2/11031_2017_9619_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/fe240eec9d4d/11031_2017_9619_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/a81f3a3785fa/11031_2017_9619_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/40b9d7dea728/11031_2017_9619_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7712/5509827/8b569dcaf458/11031_2017_9619_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceiving emotion in non-social targets: The effect of trait empathy on emotional contagion through art.在非社会目标中感知情绪:特质共情对通过艺术产生的情绪感染的影响。
Motiv Emot. 2017;41(4):492-509. doi: 10.1007/s11031-017-9619-5. Epub 2017 May 18.
2
High emotional contagion and empathy are associated with enhanced detection of emotional authenticity in laughter.高情绪感染力和同理心与增强对笑声中情绪真实性的察觉有关。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Nov;71(11):2355-2363. doi: 10.1177/1747021817741800. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
3
Empathy, Einfühlung, and aesthetic experience: the effect of emotion contagion on appreciation of representational and abstract art using fEMG and SCR.同理心、感同身受与审美体验:运用肌电描记术和皮肤电反应研究情绪感染对具象艺术和抽象艺术欣赏的影响
Cogn Process. 2018 May;19(2):147-165. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0800-2. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
Alexithymia and sensory processing sensitivity account for unique variance in the prediction of emotional contagion and empathy.述情障碍和感觉加工敏感性在情绪感染和共情的预测中解释了独特的方差变异。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1072783. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1072783. eCollection 2023.
5
Emotion recognition in nonhuman primates: How experimental research can contribute to a better understanding of underlying mechanisms.非人类灵长类动物的情绪识别:实验研究如何有助于更好地理解潜在机制。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Apr;123:24-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.029. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
Negative emotional contagion and cognitive bias in common ravens ().普通乌鸦中的负面情绪传染和认知偏差()。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 4;116(23):11547-11552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817066116. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Emotional Empathy in the Social Regulation of Distress: A Dyadic Approach.情绪共情在痛苦的社会调节中的作用:一种对偶方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jun;47(6):1004-1019. doi: 10.1177/0146167220953987. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Subjective experience of emotions and emotional empathy in paranoid schizophrenia.偏执型精神分裂症的主观情绪体验和情绪共情。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 30;220(3):825-33. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
9
The good, the bad, and the suffering. Transient emotional episodes modulate the neural circuits of pain and empathy.好的、坏的和受苦的。短暂的情绪发作调节疼痛和同理心的神经回路。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 31;116(Pt A):99-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.12.027. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
10
Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media.衡量社交媒体中的情绪感染
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):e0142390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142390. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional Analysis of Twitter Posts During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greece: Infoveillance Study.希腊新冠疫情第一阶段推特帖子的情感分析:信息监测研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 29;5(9):e27741. doi: 10.2196/27741.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Empathic Accuracy Enough to Facilitate Responsive Behavior in Dyadic Interaction? Distinguishing Ability From Motivation.同理心准确性足以促进对偶互动中的响应行为吗?区分能力和动机。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;27(3):394-404. doi: 10.1177/0956797615624491. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
2
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions.调节中介假设的处理:理论、方法与建议。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.
3
Suffering and compassion: The links among adverse life experiences, empathy, compassion, and prosocial behavior.
苦难与同情:不良生活经历、同理心、同情与亲社会行为之间的联系。
Emotion. 2016 Mar;16(2):175-182. doi: 10.1037/emo0000144. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
5
Crossover of positive states and experiences.积极状态与体验的交叉。
Stress Health. 2013 Oct;29(4):263-5. doi: 10.1002/smi.2535.
6
Friends or Foes: Is Empathy Necessary for Moral Behavior?朋友还是敌人:道德行为需要同理心吗?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):525-37. doi: 10.1177/1745691614545130.
7
Empathy: a motivated account.共情:一种有动机的解释。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1608-47. doi: 10.1037/a0037679.
8
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks.通过社交网络的大规模情感传染的实验证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8788-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320040111. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
9
Long-term relations among prosocial-media use, empathy, and prosocial behavior.亲社会媒体使用、同理心与亲社会行为之间的长期关系。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):358-68. doi: 10.1177/0956797613503854. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
10
Emotional contagion and trait empathy in prosocial behavior in young people: the contribution of autonomic (facial feedback) and balanced emotional empathy scale (BEES) measures.情绪感染和特质同理心在年轻人亲社会行为中的作用:自主(面部反馈)和平衡情绪同理心量表(BEES)测量的贡献。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2013;35(1):41-8. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.742492. Epub 2012 Nov 19.