Lee Cheng-Ling, Kuo Hann-Chorng
Department of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Tzu Chi Med J. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):6-11. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_3_17.
Traditionally, male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) have been considered a synonym for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) because most male LUTS develops in aging men. Medical treatment should be the first-line treatment for BPH and surgical intervention should be performed when there are complications or LUTS refractory to medical treatment. Recent investigations have revealed that bladder dysfunction and bladder outlet dysfunction contribute equally to male LUTS. In the diagnosis of LUTS suggestive of BPH (LUTS/BPH), the following questions should be considered: Is there an obstruction? Are the LUTS caused by an enlarged prostate? What are the appropriate tools to diagnose an obstructive BPH? Should patients with LUTS be treated before bladder outlet obstruction is confirmed? This article discusses the current consensus and controversies in the diagnosis of LUTS/BPH.
传统上,男性下尿路症状(LUTS)一直被视为良性前列腺增生(BPH)的同义词,因为大多数男性LUTS发生在老年男性中。药物治疗应作为BPH的一线治疗方法,当出现并发症或药物治疗难治的LUTS时应进行手术干预。最近的研究表明,膀胱功能障碍和膀胱出口功能障碍对男性LUTS的影响相同。在诊断提示BPH的LUTS(LUTS/BPH)时,应考虑以下问题:是否存在梗阻?LUTS是否由前列腺增大引起?诊断梗阻性BPH的合适工具是什么?在确认膀胱出口梗阻之前是否应对LUTS患者进行治疗?本文讨论了LUTS/BPH诊断中的当前共识和争议。