• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在澳大利亚背景下制定食物和营养安全度量标准。

Developing measures of food and nutrition security within an Australian context.

机构信息

School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences,Queensland University of Technology,Victoria Park Road,Kelvin Grove,QLD 4059,Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2017 Oct;20(14):2513-2522. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001288. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980017001288
PMID:28758613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10261346/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a measure of food and nutrition security for use among an Australian population that measures all pillars of food security and to establish its content validity.

DESIGN

The study consisted of two phases. Phase 1 involved focus groups with experts working in the area of food security. Data were assessed using content analysis and results informed the development of a draft tool. Phase 2 consisted of a series of three online surveys using the Delphi technique. Findings from each survey were used to establish content validity and progressively modify the tool until consensus was reached for all items.

SETTING

Australia.

SUBJECTS

Phase 1 focus groups involved twenty-five experts working in the field of food security, who were attending the Dietitians Association of Australia National Conference, 2013. Phase 2 included twenty-five experts working in food security, who were recruited via email.

RESULTS

Findings from Phase 1 supported the need for an Australian-specific tool and highlighted the failure of current tools to measure across all pillars of food security. Participants encouraged the inclusion of items to measure barriers to food acquisition and the previous single item to enable comparisons with previous data. Phase 2 findings informed the selection and modification of items for inclusion in the final tool.

CONCLUSIONS

The results led to the development of a draft tool to measure food and nutrition security, and supported its content validity. Further research is needed to validate the tool among the Australian population and to establish inter- and intra-rater reliability.

摘要

目的

开发一种适用于澳大利亚人群的食物和营养安全测量工具,该工具可衡量食物安全的所有支柱,并确定其内容效度。

设计

该研究包括两个阶段。第一阶段涉及与食品安全领域的专家进行焦点小组讨论。使用内容分析法评估数据,结果为工具草案的制定提供了信息。第二阶段包括使用德尔菲技术进行的三次在线调查。每次调查的结果都用于确定内容效度,并逐步修改工具,直到所有项目都达成共识。

地点

澳大利亚。

对象

第一阶段的焦点小组包括 25 名在食品安全领域工作的专家,他们参加了 2013 年澳大利亚营养师协会全国会议。第二阶段包括 25 名食品安全专家,通过电子邮件招募。

结果

第一阶段的结果支持需要一种澳大利亚特定的工具,并强调了现有工具在衡量食物安全所有支柱方面的失败。参与者鼓励纳入衡量获取食物障碍的项目,并保留之前的单项项目以与以前的数据进行比较。第二阶段的结果为最终工具中纳入项目的选择和修改提供了信息。

结论

研究结果促成了一种衡量食物和营养安全的工具草案的开发,并支持了其内容效度。需要进一步研究来验证该工具在澳大利亚人群中的有效性,并确定其内部和内部评分者的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Developing measures of food and nutrition security within an Australian context.在澳大利亚背景下制定食物和营养安全度量标准。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Oct;20(14):2513-2522. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001288. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
Preliminary validation and piloting of a comprehensive measure of household food security in Australia.澳大利亚家庭粮食安全综合测量的初步验证和试点研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb;21(3):526-534. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003007. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
3
Development of the Home Cooking EnviRonment and Equipment Inventory Observation form (Home-CookERI): An Assessment of Content Validity, Face Validity, and Inter-Rater Agreement.家庭烹饪环境和设备清单观察表(Home-CookERI)的编制:内容效度、表面效度和评分者间一致性评估。
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 21;12(6):1853. doi: 10.3390/nu12061853.
4
Utilising a multi-item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia.利用多项目问卷评估澳大利亚的家庭粮食安全状况。
Health Promot J Austr. 2019 Jan;30(1):9-17. doi: 10.1002/hpja.61. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Minimum reporting standards for process and outcomes assessments for private practice dietitians working in Australian primary care: The Thought Leader Consensus study.澳大利亚初级保健领域私人执业营养师的过程和结果评估最低报告标准:思想领袖共识研究。
Nutr Diet. 2023 Jun;80(3):284-296. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12776. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
An assessment of various household food security measures in Hawaiì has implications for national food security research and monitoring.对夏威夷各种家庭粮食安全措施的评估对国家粮食安全研究和监测具有启示意义。
J Nutr. 2001 Mar;131(3):749-57. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.3.749.
8
New measures to assess the "Other" three pillars of food security-availability, utilization, and stability.评估粮食安全的“其他”三个支柱——供应、利用和稳定性的新措施。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Apr 26;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01451-z.
9
Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review.测量和理解澳大利亚的粮食不安全:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;16(3):476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030476.
10
Pedi-R-MAPP: The development of a nutritional awareness tool for use in remote paediatric consultations using a modified Delphi consensus.儿童远程医疗营养评估工具(Pedi-R-MAPP):使用改良 Delphi 共识开发的用于远程儿科咨询的营养意识工具。
Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar;41(3):661-672. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A Missed Opportunity? Meal Provision in Early Childhood Education and Care Services in the Context of Socioeconomic Disadvantage.错失的机会?社会经济劣势背景下的幼儿教育与照护服务中的膳食供应
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Feb;28(2):362-371. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03849-4. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Food security definition, measures and advocacy priorities in high-income countries: a Delphi consensus study.高收入国家的食品安全定义、措施和宣传重点:德尔菲共识研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Oct;26(10):1986-1996. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000915. Epub 2023 May 5.
3
A Cross-sectional Study of Antecedents and Consequence of Panic Buying Behavior: The Moderating Effect of COVID-19 Rumors.恐慌性购买行为的前因后果的横断面研究:COVID-19 谣言的调节作用。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221126304. doi: 10.1177/00469580221126304.
4
Walking the Food Security Tightrope-Exploring the Experiences of Low-to-Middle Income Melbourne Households.走在食品安全的钢丝绳上——探索墨尔本低收入和中等收入家庭的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 10;15(10):2206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102206.
5
Preliminary validation and piloting of a comprehensive measure of household food security in Australia.澳大利亚家庭粮食安全综合测量的初步验证和试点研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb;21(3):526-534. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017003007. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement of the dimensions of food insecurity in developed countries: a systematic literature review.发达国家粮食不安全状况的维度测量:一项系统文献综述
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Nov;19(16):2887-2896. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001166. Epub 2016 May 24.
2
Internet-based Delphi research: case based discussion.基于互联网的德尔菲研究:案例讨论。
Environ Manage. 2013 Mar;51(3):511-23. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-0005-5. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
3
Coping and the biosocial consequences of food insecurity in the 21st century.21 世纪食物不安全的应对策略和生物社会后果。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;149 Suppl 55:72-94. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22161. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
4
How people interpret healthy eating: contributions of qualitative research.人们如何理解健康饮食:定性研究的贡献。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(4):282-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.11.009.
5
Construal levels of healthy eating. Exploring consumers' interpretation of health in the food context.健康饮食的构建层次。探索消费者在食品语境下对健康的理解。
Appetite. 2012 Oct;59(2):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.05.023. Epub 2012 May 26.
6
Food scarcity, not economic constraint limits consumption in a rural Aboriginal community.食物短缺而非经济限制,制约了一个农村原住民社区的消费。
Aust J Rural Health. 2012 Jun;20(3):108-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2012.01270.x.
7
Cost and affordability of healthy food in rural South Australia.南澳大利亚农村地区健康食品的成本与可负担性
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1938. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
8
Feeding her children, but risking her health: the intersection of gender, household food insecurity and obesity.喂养她的孩子,但危及她的健康:性别、家庭粮食不安全和肥胖的交叉点。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(11):1754-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
9
Best practices for survey research reports revisited: implications of target population, probability sampling, and response rate.再次探讨调查研究报告的最佳实践:目标人群、概率抽样和回复率的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):142. doi: 10.5688/aj7308142.
10
Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants.食物不安全与低收入 NHANES 参与者的慢性病有关。
J Nutr. 2010 Feb;140(2):304-10. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.112573. Epub 2009 Dec 23.