School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences,Queensland University of Technology,Victoria Park Road,Kelvin Grove,QLD 4059,Australia.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Oct;20(14):2513-2522. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001288. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
To develop a measure of food and nutrition security for use among an Australian population that measures all pillars of food security and to establish its content validity.
The study consisted of two phases. Phase 1 involved focus groups with experts working in the area of food security. Data were assessed using content analysis and results informed the development of a draft tool. Phase 2 consisted of a series of three online surveys using the Delphi technique. Findings from each survey were used to establish content validity and progressively modify the tool until consensus was reached for all items.
Australia.
Phase 1 focus groups involved twenty-five experts working in the field of food security, who were attending the Dietitians Association of Australia National Conference, 2013. Phase 2 included twenty-five experts working in food security, who were recruited via email.
Findings from Phase 1 supported the need for an Australian-specific tool and highlighted the failure of current tools to measure across all pillars of food security. Participants encouraged the inclusion of items to measure barriers to food acquisition and the previous single item to enable comparisons with previous data. Phase 2 findings informed the selection and modification of items for inclusion in the final tool.
The results led to the development of a draft tool to measure food and nutrition security, and supported its content validity. Further research is needed to validate the tool among the Australian population and to establish inter- and intra-rater reliability.
开发一种适用于澳大利亚人群的食物和营养安全测量工具,该工具可衡量食物安全的所有支柱,并确定其内容效度。
该研究包括两个阶段。第一阶段涉及与食品安全领域的专家进行焦点小组讨论。使用内容分析法评估数据,结果为工具草案的制定提供了信息。第二阶段包括使用德尔菲技术进行的三次在线调查。每次调查的结果都用于确定内容效度,并逐步修改工具,直到所有项目都达成共识。
澳大利亚。
第一阶段的焦点小组包括 25 名在食品安全领域工作的专家,他们参加了 2013 年澳大利亚营养师协会全国会议。第二阶段包括 25 名食品安全专家,通过电子邮件招募。
第一阶段的结果支持需要一种澳大利亚特定的工具,并强调了现有工具在衡量食物安全所有支柱方面的失败。参与者鼓励纳入衡量获取食物障碍的项目,并保留之前的单项项目以与以前的数据进行比较。第二阶段的结果为最终工具中纳入项目的选择和修改提供了信息。
研究结果促成了一种衡量食物和营养安全的工具草案的开发,并支持了其内容效度。需要进一步研究来验证该工具在澳大利亚人群中的有效性,并确定其内部和内部评分者的可靠性。