• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

All interventions are complex, but some are more complex than others: using iCAT_SR to assess complexity.

作者信息

Moore Graham F, Evans Rhiannon E, Hawkins Jemma, Littlecott Hannah J, Turley Ruth

机构信息

Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 11;7(7):ED000122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000122.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.ED000122
PMID:28758680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10284250/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
All interventions are complex, but some are more complex than others: using iCAT_SR to assess complexity.所有干预措施都是复杂的，但有些比其他的更复杂：使用iCAT_SR评估复杂性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 11;7(7):ED000122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000122.
2
Assessing the complexity of interventions within systematic reviews: development, content and use of a new tool (iCAT_SR).评估系统评价中干预措施的复杂性：一种新工具（iCAT_SR）的开发、内容及应用
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0349-x.
3
[Guidelines and procedures].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2018 Jan 22;138(2). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0737. Print 2018 Jan 23.
4
Introducing conceptual and analytical clarity on dimensions of complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions.在复杂干预措施的系统评价中，引入关于复杂性维度的概念和分析清晰度。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;66(11):1202-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.004.
5
Current procedural terminology coding: do the experts agree?
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000 Mar-Apr;13(2):144-6. doi: 10.3122/15572625-13-2-144.
6
Recommendation for a single procedure classification system. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics Subcommittee on Medical Classification Systems.
J AHIMA. 1993 Aug;64(8):12-4, 16, 18 passim.
7
How I cracked the CPT codes.
Med Econ. 2002 Feb 22;79(4):26-8.
8
Why physicians must stop misusing the word "noninvasive".
Ophthalmic Surg. 1989 Nov;20(11):764-5.
9
Evaluation and management and modifiers: you too can find comfort in using them.
J Med Pract Manage. 2006 Jul-Aug;22(1):60-1.
10
Benchmarking with national ICD-9-CM coded data.
J AHIMA. 1999 Mar;70(3):59-69.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-pharmacological interventions to support the cognitive rehabilitation of patients admitted to the intensive care unit: An umbrella review.支持重症监护病房患者认知康复的非药物干预措施：一项系统评价。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13190. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13190. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
Designing studies and reviews to produce informative, trustworthy evidence about complex interventions in rehabilitation: a narrative review and commentary.设计研究与综述以生成关于康复中复杂干预措施的信息丰富、值得信赖的证据：一项叙述性综述与评论
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Dec;60(6):1088-1099. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08459-4. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
Clinical validation of grouping conservative treatments in neck pain for use in a network meta-analysis: a Delphi consensus study.临床验证将颈部疼痛的保守治疗方法进行分组，用于网络荟萃分析：德尔菲共识研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):166-175. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08025-4. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
4
Personalization of Reminiscence Therapies in the Nursing Home Setting: Lessons from an Embedded Pragmatic Trial of a Music Intervention.养老院环境中回忆疗法的个性化：音乐干预嵌入式实用试验的经验教训
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Sep;24(9):1277-1278.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.04.027. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
5
Systematic review of process evaluations of interventions in trials investigating sedentary behaviour in adults.系统评价干预措施在成年人久坐行为试验中的过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e053945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053945.
6
Which factors increase informal care hours and societal costs among caregivers of people with dementia? A systematic review of Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD).哪些因素会增加痴呆症患者照料者的非正式照料时长和社会成本？对痴呆症资源利用（RUD）的系统评价。
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Sep 18;11(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00333-z.
7
How has implementation been incorporated in health technology assessments in the United Kingdom? A systematic rapid review.英国的卫生技术评估中如何纳入实施情况？系统快速评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Aug 18;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00766-2.
8
Application of the intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews within a Cochrane review: an illustrative case study.Cochrane系统评价中干预复杂性评估工具的应用：一个实例研究
HRB Open Res. 2020 Jun 1;3:31. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13044.1. eCollection 2020.
9
LIVE@Home.Path-innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method, stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial.居家痴呆症患者及其照护者的临床路径创新：一项混合方法、阶梯式、随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 9;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04414-y.
10
Evaluation and facilitation of intervention fidelity in community exercise programs through an adaptation of the TIDier framework.通过改编 TIDier 框架评估和促进社区锻炼计划的干预一致性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 30;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4919-y.

本文引用的文献

1
What theory, for whom and in which context? Reflections on the application of theory in the development and evaluation of complex population health interventions.什么理论、针对谁以及在何种背景下？关于理论在复杂人群健康干预措施的制定与评估中的应用的思考。
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec;3:132-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.005.
2
Assessing the complexity of interventions within systematic reviews: development, content and use of a new tool (iCAT_SR).评估系统评价中干预措施的复杂性：一种新工具（iCAT_SR）的开发、内容及应用
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0349-x.
3
Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework.理解情境与实施中的复杂性：复杂干预措施的情境与实施（CICI）框架
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 15;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0552-5.
4
Outcomes in systematic reviews of complex interventions never reached "high" GRADE ratings when compared with those of simple interventions.与简单干预措施相比，复杂干预措施的系统评价结果从未达到“高”等级的GRADE评级。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;78:22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
5
Application of simplified Complexity Theory concepts for healthcare social systems to explain the implementation of evidence into practice.将简化复杂性理论概念应用于医疗社会系统，以解释循证实践的实施情况。
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Feb;72(2):461-80. doi: 10.1111/jan.12815. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
6
Socioeconomic gradients in the effects of universal school-based health behaviour interventions: a systematic review of intervention studies.基于学校的全民健康行为干预效果的社会经济梯度：干预研究的系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 17;15:907. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2244-x.
7
The World Health Organization's Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.世界卫生组织促进健康学校框架：一项Cochrane系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 12;15:130. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1360-y.
8
Obesity prevention and the Health promoting Schools framework: essential components and barriers to success.肥胖预防与健康促进学校框架：成功的关键要素与障碍
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 13;12:15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0167-7.
9
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估：医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
10
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告：干预描述和复制（TIDieR）清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.