• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于意图的道德发展:意图突显和新近性、疏忽以及结果对儿童和成人判断的影响。

The development of intention-based morality: The influence of intention salience and recency, negligence, and outcome on children's and adults' judgments.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of East Anglia.

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1895-1911. doi: 10.1037/dev0000380. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1037/dev0000380
PMID:28758780
Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the influences on 4-8 year-olds' and adults' moral judgments. In both, participants were told stories from previous studies that had indicated that children's judgments are largely outcome-based. Building on recent research in which one change to these studies' methods resulted in substantially more intention-based judgment, in Experiment 1 (N = 75) the salience and recency of intention information were increased, and in Experiment 2 (N = 99) carefulness information (i.e., the absence of negligence) was also added. In both experiments even the youngest children's judgments were primarily intention-based, and in Experiment 2 punishment judgments were similar to adults' from 5-6 years. Comparisons of data across studies and experiments indicated that both changes increased the proportion of intention-based punishment judgments-but not acceptability judgments-across age-groups. These findings challenge and help to explain those of much previous research, according to which children's judgments are primarily outcome-based. However, younger participants continued to judge according to outcome more than older participants. This might indicate that young children are more influenced by outcomes than are adults, but other possible explanations are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

两项实验旨在探究对 4-8 岁儿童和成年人道德判断的影响。在这两项实验中,参与者都被讲述了之前研究的故事,这些研究表明儿童的判断主要基于结果。基于最近的研究,这些研究方法的一个改变导致了更多基于意图的判断,在实验 1(N=75)中,增加了意图信息的突出性和新近性,在实验 2(N=99)中,还增加了谨慎信息(即没有疏忽)。在这两项实验中,即使是最小的儿童的判断也主要是基于意图的,并且在实验 2 中,惩罚判断与 5-6 岁儿童的成年人判断相似。对跨研究和实验的数据进行比较表明,这两个变化都增加了各年龄组基于意图的惩罚判断的比例,但不包括可接受性判断。这些发现挑战并有助于解释之前许多研究的结果,根据这些研究,儿童的判断主要基于结果。然而,年轻的参与者比年长的参与者更倾向于根据结果进行判断。这可能表明,年幼的儿童比成年人更容易受到结果的影响,但也讨论了其他可能的解释。

相似文献

1
The development of intention-based morality: The influence of intention salience and recency, negligence, and outcome on children's and adults' judgments.基于意图的道德发展:意图突显和新近性、疏忽以及结果对儿童和成人判断的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1895-1911. doi: 10.1037/dev0000380. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children's and adults' moral judgments.意图、结果和问题措辞对儿童及成人道德判断的影响。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:190-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
3
The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children's moral judgments.疏忽、意图和结果对儿童道德判断的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Dec;104(4):382-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
4
Who Is to Blame? Children's and Adults' Moral Judgments Regarding Victim and Transgressor Negligence.该由谁负责?儿童和成人对受害者和违规者疏忽的道德判断。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12833. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12833.
5
Biases in children's and adults' moral judgments.儿童和成人道德判断中的偏见。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Sep;113(1):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
6
Moral complexity in middle childhood: children's evaluations of necessary harm.儿童中期的道德复杂性:儿童对必要伤害的评价。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jan;50(1):22-33. doi: 10.1037/a0032992. Epub 2013 May 6.
7
Children's judgements of psychological harm in normal and noncanonical situations.儿童对正常和非典型情境中心理伤害的判断。
Child Dev. 2001 Jan-Feb;72(1):66-81. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00266.
8
But they weren't being careful! Role of theory of mind in moral judgments about victim and transgressor negligence.但是他们不够小心!心理理论在对受害者和冒犯者疏忽的道德判断中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Dec;212:105234. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105234. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
False belief understanding and moral judgment in young children.幼儿对错误信念的理解与道德判断
Dev Psychol. 2022 Nov;58(11):2022-2035. doi: 10.1037/dev0001411. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
10
Preschoolers Focus on Others' Intentions When Forming Sociomoral Judgments.学龄前儿童在形成社会道德判断时会关注他人的意图。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 2;9:1851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01851. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Wrongness and Blame Judgments and Their Dynamics: Toward a Three-Input Processing Model of Moral Judgment.错误与责备判断及其动态变化:迈向道德判断的三输入加工模型
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2024 Nov 11;37:19. doi: 10.5334/irsp.868. eCollection 2024.
2
How does reasoning influence intentionality attribution in the case of side effects?在副作用的情况下,推理是如何影响意向性归因的?
Cogn Process. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01300-w.
3
Children's moral reasoning about self- versus other-benefiting public health measures.儿童对自身受益和他人受益的公共卫生措施的道德推理。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 May;229:105623. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105623. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
4
Five-year-old children value reasons in apologies for belief-based accidents.五岁儿童会根据道歉中是否包含原因来评价信念性意外事件。
Child Dev. 2023 May;94(3):e143-e153. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13893. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
To Punish or Exclude? Children's Responses to Unfair and Fair Advantages Created in Competitive Contexts.惩罚还是排斥?儿童对竞争情境中产生的不公平和公平优势的反应。
Cogn Dev. 2022 Apr-Jun;62. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101168. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
6
When a Circle Becomes the Letter O: Young Children's Conceptualization of Learning and Its Relation With Theory of Mind Development.当一个圆圈变成字母O:幼儿对学习的概念化及其与心理理论发展的关系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 14;11:596419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596419. eCollection 2020.
7
Cultural Similarities and Differences in the Development of Sociomoral Judgments: An Eye-Tracking Study.社会道德判断发展中的文化异同:一项眼动追踪研究。
Cogn Dev. 2021 Jan-Mar;57. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100974. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
Brief Report: Young Children with Autism Can Generate Intent-Based Moral Judgments.简要报告:自闭症儿童能够做出基于意图的道德判断。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Dec;49(12):5078-5085. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04212-9.