Suppr超能文献

后天性颅神经麻痹的神经影像学检查:眼科医生与神经科医生的比较

Neurological Imaging in Acquired Cranial Nerve Palsy: Ophthalmologists vs. Neurologists.

作者信息

Klein Hesselink Tessa, Gutter Mari, Polling Jan Roelof

机构信息

a Department of Ophthalmology , Diakonessenhuis , Utrecht , the Netherlands.

b Department of Ophthalmology , Isala Klinieken , Zwolle , the Netherlands.

出版信息

Strabismus. 2017 Sep;25(3):134-139. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2017.1349815. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cranial nerve palsies often require neurological imaging by MRI. Guidelines on whether or not to utilize MRI have been absent or lack clarity. In daily practice, both neurologists and ophthalmologists treat patients with cranial nerve palsy and determine whether neuro-imaging is required. There appear to be differences in policy with respect to neuro-imaging. The question, which will be answered in this study, is the following: to what extent do differences in policy exist between ophthalmologists and neurologists regarding imaging by MRI of patients with acquired ocular cranial nerve palsy?

METHOD

PubMed database was searched for literature on acquired cranial nerve palsy and MRI scanning performed by ophthalmologists and neurologists. Case series published between 2000 and 2015 were included. The first author screened the literature on eligibility, profession of the authors, and conducted data abstraction.

RESULT

Ten case series were found eligible for analysis. A total of 889 cranial nerve palsies were described, 770 by ophthalmologists and 119 by neurologists. The age range of patients in all case series was 2 to 96 years of age. The oculomotor nerve was investigated in 162 patients, the trochlear nerve in 131 patients, and the abducens nerve in 486 patients. All neurologists (n=3) and 2 out of 7 investigated ophthalmologists recommended performing MRI scanning in every patient who presented with an ocular cranial nerve palsy, while 5 ophthalmologists (5/7) opted to triage patients for risk factors associated with cranial nerve palsies prior to ordering MRI imaging. When different groups of patients were viewed separately, it became apparent that almost all specialists agreed that every patient with a third nerve palsy and patients under 50 years of age should undergo MRI scanning. In patients with fourth nerve palsy, MRI scanning was not indicated.

CONCLUSION

The neurologists in this study were more likely to perform MRI scanning in every patient presenting with ocular cranial nerve palsy. Ophthalmologists were more likely to determine risk factors associated with cranial nerve palsy, which they took into account when deciding whether or not to perform neurological imaging in patients aged more than 50 years or presenting with abducens nerve palsy.

摘要

目的

颅神经麻痹通常需要通过磁共振成像(MRI)进行神经影像学检查。关于是否使用MRI的指南一直缺乏或不够明确。在日常实践中,神经科医生和眼科医生都会治疗颅神经麻痹患者,并决定是否需要进行神经影像学检查。在神经影像学检查的政策方面似乎存在差异。本研究将回答的问题如下:在后天性眼颅神经麻痹患者的MRI成像方面,眼科医生和神经科医生在政策上的差异程度如何?

方法

在PubMed数据库中搜索关于后天性颅神经麻痹以及眼科医生和神经科医生进行MRI扫描的文献。纳入2000年至2015年间发表的病例系列。第一作者筛选文献的入选资格、作者的专业,并进行数据提取。

结果

发现10个病例系列符合分析要求。共描述了889例颅神经麻痹,其中眼科医生描述了770例,神经科医生描述了119例。所有病例系列中患者的年龄范围为2至96岁。162例患者接受了动眼神经检查,131例患者接受了滑车神经检查,486例患者接受了展神经检查。所有神经科医生(n = 3)以及7名接受调查的眼科医生中的2名建议对每例出现眼颅神经麻痹的患者进行MRI扫描,而5名眼科医生(5/7)选择在开具MRI成像检查前根据与颅神经麻痹相关的危险因素对患者进行分类。当分别查看不同组的患者时,很明显几乎所有专家都同意,每例动眼神经麻痹患者以及50岁以下的患者都应接受MRI扫描。对于滑车神经麻痹患者,不建议进行MRI扫描。

结论

本研究中的神经科医生更倾向于对每例出现眼颅神经麻痹的患者进行MRI扫描。眼科医生更倾向于确定与颅神经麻痹相关的危险因素,并在决定是否对50岁以上或出现展神经麻痹的患者进行神经影像学检查时考虑这些因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验