Frykman Philip K, Kim Sungjin, Wester Tomas, Nordenskjöld Agneta, Kawaguchi Akemi, Hui Thomas T, Teitelbaum Daniel H, Granström Anna L, Rogatko Andre
Division of Pediatric Surgery and Departments of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center at the Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):708-717. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
To identify the optimal clinical criteria to diagnose Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) in children with Hirschsprung disease (HSCR).
HAEC is the most common life-threatening complication in HSCR patients, yet the diagnostic criteria for HAEC remain unclear. The consensus-based HAEC scoring system was not validated using patient data, thereby making its diagnostic accuracy uncertain.
From 2009 to 2015, consecutive children with HSCR underwent retrospective evaluation of their medical records, and questionnaire-directed parent interviews to identify treatment of suspected HAEC episodes and the 16 clinical criteria in the HAEC score. Logistic regression modeling was employed to identify criteria predicting suspected HAEC episodes.
One hundred sixteen HSCR patients met inclusion criteria, 43 patients (37.1%) were treated for at least one suspected HAEC episode. An HAEC score of 4 maximized the sum of sensitivity (83.7%) and specificity (98.6%) while the previously established cut-off score of 10 showed lower sensitivity (41.9%) with perfect specificity. Multivariable analysis identified four criteria utilized to create a new HAEC Risk score with performance characteristics similar to the HAEC score cutoff of 4.
When using the HAEC score, a cutoff of 4 should be used rather than 10, which under-diagnosed patients with HAEC. Alternatively, the new HAEC Risk score could be employed.
Diagnostic Study, Level 3.
确定诊断先天性巨结肠相关小肠结肠炎(HAEC)患儿的最佳临床标准。
HAEC是先天性巨结肠(HSCR)患者中最常见的危及生命的并发症,但HAEC的诊断标准仍不明确。基于共识的HAEC评分系统未使用患者数据进行验证,因此其诊断准确性尚不确定。
对2009年至2015年期间连续的HSCR患儿进行病历回顾性评估,并通过问卷调查对家长进行访谈,以确定疑似HAEC发作的治疗情况以及HAEC评分中的16项临床标准。采用逻辑回归模型确定预测疑似HAEC发作的标准。
116例HSCR患者符合纳入标准,43例患者(37.1%)至少接受过一次疑似HAEC发作的治疗。HAEC评分为4时,敏感性(83.7%)和特异性(98.6%)之和最大,而先前确定的截断分数10的敏感性较低(41.9%),特异性为100%。多变量分析确定了四项标准,用于创建一个新的HAEC风险评分,其性能特征与HAEC评分截断值4相似。
使用HAEC评分时,应采用截断值4而非10,截断值10会导致HAEC患者诊断不足。或者,也可以采用新的HAEC风险评分。
诊断性研究,3级。