Suppr超能文献

韩国人群中缩窄性心包炎心包切除术的长期结果

Long-term results of radical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in Korean population.

作者信息

Choi Min Suk, Jeong Dong Seop, Oh Jae K, Chang Sung-A, Park Sung-Ji, Chung Suryeun

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Feb 6;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0845-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The extent of pericardiectomy is an important issue in constrictive pericarditis but its impact on long-term outcomes has been rarely reported. We compared long-term results of radical pericardiectomy with conventional phrenic to phrenic pericardiectomy.

METHODS

Ninety patients who underwent pericardiectomies between February 1995 and April 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. They were classified into conventional (n = 37) and radical (n = 53) groups according to pericardiectomy being performed anterior or posterior to the phrenic nerves, respectively. The follow-up duration at outpatient clinic was 37.6 (11.7, 86.6) months and the survival data until 91.6 (54.5, 147.0) months were obtained. The last echocardiographies were done at 22.4 (4.35, 60.85) months.

RESULTS

The early mortality rate was 4.4% (4/90). They all belonged to the conventional group and died of low cardiac output syndrome. The survival rate was higher in the radical group (P = .032, 74.7 ± 9.2% versus 50.4 ± 11.9% in 20 years). NYHA class of both groups had recovered until the last follow-up but the radical group showed better recovery (P < .001). The conventional pericardiectomy (HR = 6.181; 95% CI (1.042, 36.656)), redosternotomy (HR = 6.441; 95% CI (1.224, 33.889) and preoperative grade of tricuspid regurgitation (HR = 15.003; 95% CI (1.099, 204.894) were associated with late mortality. Right ventricular systolic pressure decreased, and pericardial thickening resolved only in the radical group with significant intergroup differences as time went on. Tricuspid regurgitation worsened after the operation in both groups, but it deteriorated more in the conventional group. However, it improved over time in the radical group.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical pericardiectomy led to greater improvement in right ventricular systolic pressure and lesser deterioration of tricuspid regurgitation with the passage of time than did the conventional procedure. Conventional pericardiectomy and preoperative higher grade tricuspid regurgitation were associated with long-term mortality.

摘要

背景

心包切除术的范围是缩窄性心包炎治疗中的一个重要问题,但它对长期预后的影响鲜有报道。我们比较了根治性心包切除术与传统膈神经至膈神经心包切除术的长期结果。

方法

回顾性分析了1995年2月至2015年4月期间接受心包切除术的90例患者。根据心包切除术是在膈神经前方还是后方进行,将他们分为传统组(n = 37)和根治组(n = 53)。门诊随访时间为37.6(11.7,86.6)个月,并获得了直至91.6(54.5,147.0)个月的生存数据。最后一次超声心动图检查在22.4(4.35,60.85)个月时进行。

结果

早期死亡率为4.4%(4/90)。他们均属于传统组,死于低心排血量综合征。根治组的生存率更高(P = 0.032,20年时为74.7±9.2%,而传统组为50.4±11.9%)。两组的纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级在最后一次随访时均已恢复,但根治组恢复得更好(P < 0.001)。传统心包切除术(HR = 6.181;95%置信区间(1.042,36.656))、再次胸骨切开术(HR = 6.441;95%置信区间(1.224,33.889))和术前三尖瓣反流分级(HR = 15.003;95%置信区间(1.099,204.894))与晚期死亡率相关。随着时间推移,仅根治组右心室收缩压下降,心包增厚消失,组间差异显著。两组术后三尖瓣反流均加重,但传统组恶化更明显。然而,根治组随时间推移有所改善。

结论

与传统手术相比,根治性心包切除术随着时间推移能使右心室收缩压有更大改善,三尖瓣反流恶化程度更小。传统心包切除术和术前较高分级的三尖瓣反流与长期死亡率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/faa9/6364466/380081b95df3/13019_2019_845_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验