Suppr超能文献

三种不同DNA提取方法用于[食源性病原体名称未给出]的比较

Comparison of Three Different DNA Extraction Methods for as a Food Born Pathogen.

作者信息

Eslami Gilda, Khalatbari-Limaki Sepideh, Ehrampoush Mohammad Hasan, Gholamrezaei Mostafa, Hajimohammadi Bahador, Oryan Ahmad

机构信息

Research Center for Food Hygiene and Safety, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Dept. of Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Parasitol. 2017 Apr-Jun;12(2):236-242.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the most important items in molecular characterization of food-borne pathogens is high quality genomic DNA. In this study, we investigated three protocols and compared their simplicity, duration and costs for extracting genomic DNA from .

METHODS

The larvae were collected from the sheep's visceral organs from the Yazd Slaughterhouse during May 2013. DNA extraction was done in three different methods, including commercial DNA extraction kit, Phenol Chloroform Isoamylalcohol (PCI), and salting out. Extracted DNA in each method was assessed for quantity and quality using spectrophotometery and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively.

RESULTS

The less duration was regarding to commercial DNA extraction kit and then salting out protocol. The cost benefit one was salting out and then PCI method. The best quantity was regarding to PCI with 72.20±29.20 ng/μl, and purity of OD260/OD280 in 1.76±0.947. Agarose gel electrophoresis for assessing the quality found all the same.

CONCLUSION

Salting out is introduced as the best method for DNA extraction from as a food-borne pathogen with the least costand appropriate purity. Although, the best purity was regarding to PCI but PCI is not safe as salting out. In addition, the duration of salting out was less than PCI. The least duration was seen in commercial DNA extraction kit, but it is expensive and therefore is not recommended for developing countries where consumption of offal is common.

摘要

背景

食源性病原体分子特征分析中最重要的项目之一是高质量的基因组DNA。在本研究中,我们研究了三种提取从……中提取基因组DNA的方法,并比较了它们的简便性、耗时和成本。

方法

2013年5月从亚兹德屠宰场的羊内脏器官中采集幼虫。采用三种不同方法进行DNA提取,包括商业DNA提取试剂盒、苯酚氯仿异戊醇(PCI)法和盐析法。分别使用分光光度法和琼脂糖凝胶电泳对每种方法提取的DNA进行定量和定性评估。

结果

耗时最短的是商业DNA提取试剂盒,其次是盐析法。成本效益最佳的是盐析法,其次是PCI法。PCI法提取的DNA浓度最高,为72.20±29.20 ng/μl,OD260/OD280纯度为1.76±0.947。通过琼脂糖凝胶电泳评估质量,结果发现所有方法提取的DNA质量相同。

结论

盐析法被认为是从作为食源性病原体的……中提取DNA的最佳方法,成本最低且纯度合适。虽然PCI法的纯度最佳,但PCI法不如盐析法安全。此外,盐析法的耗时比PCI法短。商业DNA提取试剂盒耗时最短,但成本高昂,因此不推荐给食用内脏常见的发展中国家。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86f8/5527034/fb06c65bacf0/IJPA-12-236-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验