Suppr超能文献

不同浓度及辅料的四氟化钛对预防牙本质侵蚀的作用

Effects of Different Concentrations and Excipients of Titanium Tetrafluoride on Dentin Erosion Prevention.

作者信息

Mantilla Taís, Ramos-Oliveira Thayanne, Silva Camila, Cersosimo Maria, Turssi Cecilia, Freitas Patricia

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2017;15(5):461-465. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a38738.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the preventive effect of titanium fluoride (TiF4) gel and solution, in different concentrations, on dentin erosion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 140 root dentin slabs (3 x 3 x 1 mm) cut from 70 freshly extracted human third molars, 70 with intermediate Knoop microhardness and lowest surface curvature were selected and randomly divided into 7 groups (n = 10): G1: negative control (no treatment); G2: positive control (AmF/NaF/SnCl2 solution); G3: placebo gel (no fluoride); G4: 1% TiF4 solution; G5: 1% TiF4 gel; G6: 4% TiF4 solution; G7: 4% TiF4 gel. Samples were subjected to 10 days of erosive cycling, consisting of alternating exposures to citric acid (0.05 M, pH 2.3, 2 min, 6x/day) and remineralizing solution (pH 7.0, 90 min, between acid exposures). Each cycle consisted of a total of 6 immersions in acid per day. After 5 and 10 days of pH cycling, surface loss was assessed by optical profilometry (µm).

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05) showed that after 5 days, G7 revealed a significant reduction in surface loss compared to the other groups, while G4, G5 and G6 did not differ significantly from G1. After 10 days of erosive challenges, G7 did not differ significantly from G2 and there was no difference between G4, G5, G6 and G1. G3 showed the highest surface loss compared to all groups, except G1 and G5.

CONCLUSION

The treatments tested were not able to prevent dentinal erosion, but the application of 4% TiF4 gel did reduce surface loss of dentin.

摘要

目的

评估不同浓度的氟化钛(TiF4)凝胶和溶液对牙本质侵蚀的预防作用。

材料与方法

从70颗新鲜拔除的人类第三磨牙上切取140个牙根牙本质片(3×3×1毫米),选择70个努氏显微硬度中等且表面曲率最低的牙本质片,随机分为7组(n = 10):G1:阴性对照(未处理);G2:阳性对照(AmF/NaF/SnCl2溶液);G3:安慰剂凝胶(无氟化物);G4:1% TiF4溶液;G5:1% TiF4凝胶;G6:4% TiF4溶液;G7:4% TiF4凝胶。样本进行10天的侵蚀循环处理,包括交替暴露于柠檬酸(0.05 M,pH 2.3,2分钟,每天6次)和再矿化溶液(pH 7.0,90分钟,在酸暴露之间)。每个循环每天总共进行6次酸浸泡。在pH循环5天和10天后,通过光学轮廓仪评估表面损失(微米)。

结果

单因素方差分析和Tukey检验(p < 0.05)表明,5天后,G7与其他组相比表面损失显著降低,而G4、G5和G6与G1无显著差异。经过10天的侵蚀挑战后,G7与G2无显著差异,G4、G5、G6与G1之间也无差异。与除G1和G5之外的所有组相比.G3显示出最高的表面损失。

结论

所测试的处理方法未能预防牙本质侵蚀,但应用4% TiF4凝胶确实减少了牙本质的表面损失。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验