Suppr超能文献

急性病住院内科患者中延长疗程的血栓预防对静脉血栓栓塞和大出血的影响:双变量分析。

Effect of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis on venous thromboembolism and major bleeding among acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: a bivariate analysis.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Departments of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct;15(10):1913-1922. doi: 10.1111/jth.13783. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Essentials Anticoagulants prevent venous thromboembolism but may be associated with greater bleeding risks. Bivariate analysis assumes a non-linear relationship between efficacy and safety outcomes. Extended full-dose betrixaban is favorable over standard enoxaparin in bivariate endpoint. Clinicians must weigh efficacy and safety outcomes in decision-making on thromboprophylaxis.

SUMMARY

Background Among acutely ill hospitalized medical patients, extended-duration thromboprophylaxis reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but some pharmacologic strategies have been associated with greater risks of major bleeding, thereby offsetting the net clinical benefit (NCB). Methods To assess the risk-benefit profile of anticoagulation regimens, a previously described bivariate method that does not assume a linear risk-benefit tradeoff and can accommodate different margins for efficacy and safety was performed to simultaneously assess efficacy (symptomatic VTE) and safety (major bleeding) on the basis of data from four randomized controlled trials of extended-duration (30-46 days) versus standard-duration (6-14 days) thromboprophylaxis among 28 227 patients (EXCLAIM, ADOPT, MAGELLAN and APEX trials). Results Extended thromboprophylaxis with full-dose betrixaban (80 mg once daily) was superior in efficacy and non-inferior in safety to standard-duration enoxaparin, and showed a significantly favorable NCB, with a risk difference of - 0.51% (- 0.89% to - 0.10%) in the bivariate outcome. Extended enoxaparin was superior in efficacy and inferior in safety (bivariate outcome: 0.03% [- 0.37% to 0.43%]), whereas apixaban and rivaroxaban were non-inferior in efficacy and inferior in safety (- 0.20% [- 0.49% to 0.17%] and 0.23% [- 0.16% to 0.69%], respectively). Reduced-dose betrixaban did not show a significant difference in either efficacy or safety (0.41% [- 0.85% to 1.94%]). Conclusions In a bivariate analysis that assumes non-linear risk-benefit tradeoffs, extended prophylaxis with full-dose betrixaban was superior to standard-duration enoxaparin, whereas other regimens failed to simultaneously achieve both superiority and non-inferiority with respect to symptomatic VTE and major bleeding in the management of acutely ill hospitalized medical patients.

摘要

背景

在急性住院的内科患者中,延长疗程的血栓预防可降低静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险,但一些药物治疗策略与大出血风险增加相关,从而抵消了净临床获益(NCB)。方法:为了评估抗凝治疗方案的风险-获益情况,我们使用了一种先前描述的双变量方法,该方法不假设风险-获益的线性权衡关系,并且可以适应疗效和安全性的不同边际,同时基于四项随机对照试验(EXCLAIM、ADOPT、MAGELLAN 和 APEX 试验)中 28227 例接受延长疗程(30-46 天)与标准疗程(6-14 天)血栓预防的患者数据,同时评估疗效(有症状 VTE)和安全性(大出血)。结果:全剂量贝曲西班(每日 80mg 一次)的延长疗程治疗在疗效上优于标准疗程依诺肝素,在安全性上非劣效于标准疗程依诺肝素,并且具有显著的有利 NCB,双变量结果显示风险差异为-0.51%(-0.89%至-0.10%)。延长疗程的依诺肝素在疗效上更优,而在安全性上更差(双变量结果:0.03%[-0.37%至 0.43%]),而阿哌沙班和利伐沙班在疗效和安全性上非劣效(-0.20%[-0.49%至 0.17%]和 0.23%[-0.16%至 0.69%])。低剂量贝曲西班在疗效或安全性方面均无显著差异(0.41%[-0.85%至 1.94%])。结论:在假设风险-获益呈非线性权衡关系的双变量分析中,全剂量贝曲西班的延长疗程预防优于标准疗程的依诺肝素,而其他方案在治疗急性住院内科患者的有症状 VTE 和大出血方面未能同时实现疗效和安全性的优势和非劣效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验