Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Cancer and Blood Disorder Institute, and Heart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA. 2022 Jan 11;327(2):129-137. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23182.
Among patients younger than 21 years of age, the optimal duration of anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism is unknown.
To test the hypothesis that a 6-week duration of anticoagulant therapy for provoked venous thromboembolism is noninferior to a conventional 3-month therapy duration in patients younger than 21 years of age.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial involving 417 patients younger than 21 years of age with acute, provoked venous thromboembolism enrolled at 42 centers in 5 countries from 2008-2021. The main exclusions were severe anticoagulant deficiencies or prior venous thromboembolism. Patients without persistent antiphospholipid antibodies and whose thrombi were resolved or not completely occlusive upon repeat imaging at 6 weeks after diagnosis underwent randomization. The final visit for the primary end points occurred in January 2021.
Total duration for anticoagulant therapy of 6 weeks (n = 207) vs 3 months (n = 210) for provoked venous thromboembolism.
The primary efficacy and safety end points were centrally adjudicated symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and clinically relevant bleeding events within 1 year blinded to treatment group. The primary analysis was noninferiority in the per-protocol population. The noninferiority boundary incorporated a bivariate trade-off that included an absolute increase of 0% in symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism with an absolute risk reduction of 4% in clinically relevant bleeding events (1 of 3 points on the bivariate noninferiority boundary curve).
Among 417 randomized patients, 297 (median age, 8.3 [range, 0.04-20.9] years; 49% female) met criteria for the primary per-protocol population analysis. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for the 1-year cumulative incidence of the primary efficacy outcome was 0.66% (95% CI, 0%-1.95%) in the 6-week anticoagulant therapy group and 0.70% (95% CI, 0%-2.07%) in the 3-month anticoagulant therapy group, and for the primary safety outcome, the incidence was 0.65% (95% CI, 0%-1.91%) and 0.70% (95% CI, 0%-2.06%). Based on absolute risk differences in recurrent venous thromboembolism and clinically relevant bleeding events between groups, noninferiority was demonstrated. Adverse events occurred in 26% of patients in the 6-week anticoagulant therapy group and in 32% of patients in the 3-month anticoagulant therapy group; the most common adverse event was fever (1.9% and 3.4%, respectively).
Among patients younger than 21 years of age with provoked venous thromboembolism, anticoagulant therapy for 6 weeks compared with 3 months met noninferiority criteria based on the trade-off between recurrent venous thromboembolism risk and bleeding risk.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00687882.
重要性:在年龄小于 21 岁的患者中,静脉血栓栓塞症抗凝治疗的最佳持续时间尚不清楚。
目的:检验假设,即对于年龄小于 21 岁的有诱因的静脉血栓栓塞症患者,抗凝治疗 6 周与常规 3 个月治疗相比,非劣效于后者。
设计、地点和患者:这是一项随机临床试验,纳入了 2008 年至 2021 年期间来自 5 个国家的 42 个中心的 417 名年龄小于 21 岁的急性、有诱因的静脉血栓栓塞症患者。主要排除标准为严重抗凝缺陷或既往静脉血栓栓塞症。无持续抗磷脂抗体且血栓在诊断后 6 周重复成像时已缓解或未完全闭塞的患者,随机分组。主要终点的最后一次随访发生在 2021 年 1 月。
干预措施:有诱因的静脉血栓栓塞症患者接受 6 周(n=207)或 3 个月(n=210)的抗凝治疗。
主要结局和措施:主要疗效和安全性终点是经中心评估的 1 年内有症状的复发性静脉血栓栓塞症和盲法治疗组的临床相关出血事件。主要分析是基于方案人群的非劣效性。非劣效性边界纳入了一个双变量权衡,包括有症状的复发性静脉血栓栓塞症风险增加 0%,同时临床相关出血事件风险降低 4%(双变量非劣效性边界曲线的 1 个点)。
结果:在 417 名随机患者中,有 297 名(中位年龄 8.3 [范围,0.04-20.9] 岁;49%为女性)符合主要方案人群分析的标准。6 周抗凝治疗组 1 年累积发生率的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值为 0.66%(95%CI,0%-1.95%),3 个月抗凝治疗组为 0.70%(95%CI,0%-2.07%);对于主要安全性结局,发生率分别为 0.65%(95%CI,0%-1.91%)和 0.70%(95%CI,0%-2.06%)。基于组间复发性静脉血栓栓塞症和临床相关出血事件的绝对风险差异,证明了非劣效性。6 周抗凝治疗组有 26%的患者出现不良事件,3 个月抗凝治疗组有 32%的患者出现不良事件;最常见的不良事件是发热(分别为 1.9%和 3.4%)。
结论和相关性:在年龄小于 21 岁的有诱因的静脉血栓栓塞症患者中,与 3 个月相比,6 周的抗凝治疗在复发性静脉血栓栓塞症风险和出血风险之间达到了非劣效性标准。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00687882。