Marsland Finn, Anson Judith Mary, Waddington Gordon, Holmberg Hans-Christer, Chapman Dale Wilson
UC Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jan 28;2:546205. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.546205. eCollection 2020.
This study was designed to examine macro-kinematic parameters of six female cross-country skiers during the qualifying, semi-final and final rounds of a 1.1 km sprint competition in classical technique. During each round these skiers were monitored continuously with a single micro-sensor, and their cycle parameters and relative use of these two sub-techniques calculated. Within each round six sections of the course, during which all skiers employed either double pole (DP) or diagonal stride (DS) sub-technique, were chosen for additional analysis. The mean macro-kinematic cycle parameters and relative usage of sub-techniques over the full course did not differ significantly between rounds. On average 54% of the course was covered employing DP and 13% using DS, while 32% was covered utilizing a non-cyclical or irregular technique. With DP, the mean racing speed and cycle rate (CR) on the starting, middle and finishing sections of the course differed significantly, with no differences in mean cycle length (CL) between the last two sections. At the finish, higher DP speed was achieved by increasing CR. On the three hills, where all athletes utilized DS, mean racing speed and CL, but not mean CR, differed significantly. On these sections DS speed was increased by utilizing longer cycles. The individual skiers utilized a variety of macro-kinematic strategies during different rounds and on different sections of the course, depending on individual strengths, preferences and pacing strategies, as well as the course topography and tactical interactions with other skiers. Such collection of macro-kinematic data during competitions can help to identify an individual skier's strengths and weaknesses, guiding the testing of different cycle rates, and lengths on different terrains during training in order to optimize performance.
本研究旨在考察6名女子越野滑雪运动员在1.1公里传统技术短距离比赛的资格赛、半决赛和决赛中的宏观运动学参数。在每一轮比赛中,使用单个微型传感器对这些滑雪运动员进行连续监测,并计算他们的周期参数以及这两种子技术的相对使用情况。在每一轮比赛中,选择赛道的六个部分进行额外分析,在这些部分所有滑雪运动员都采用双杖(DP)或斜向滑行(DS)子技术。各轮比赛中,整个赛道的平均宏观运动学周期参数和子技术的相对使用情况没有显著差异。平均而言,使用DP技术覆盖了54%的赛道,使用DS技术覆盖了13%的赛道,而使用非周期性或不规则技术覆盖了32%的赛道。在DP技术下,赛道起点、中间和终点部分的平均比赛速度和周期率(CR)有显著差异,最后两段的平均周期长度(CL)没有差异。在终点,通过提高CR实现了更高的DP速度。在所有运动员都使用DS技术的三个山坡上,平均比赛速度和CL有显著差异,但平均CR没有差异。在这些路段,通过使用更长的周期提高了DS速度。根据个人优势、偏好和节奏策略,以及赛道地形和与其他滑雪者的战术互动,不同的滑雪者在不同轮次和赛道的不同部分采用了多种宏观运动学策略。在比赛期间收集此类宏观运动学数据有助于识别单个滑雪者的优势和劣势,指导在训练中测试不同地形上的不同周期率和长度,以优化表现。