• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康体检者(HEXA)研究中自我报告癌症病史的有效性:自我报告与癌症登记记录的比较

Validity of self-reported cancer history in the health examinees (HEXA) study: A comparison of self-report and cancer registry records.

作者信息

Cho Sooyoung, Shin Aesun, Song Daesub, Park Jae Kyung, Kim Yeonjung, Choi Ji-Yeob, Kang Daehee, Lee Jong-Koo

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;50(Pt A):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.canep.2017.07.010
PMID:28763723
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the validity of the cohort study participants' self-reported cancer history via data linkage to a cancer registry database.

METHODS

We included 143,965 participants from the Health Examinees (HEXA) study recruited between 2004 and 2013 who gave informed consent for record linkage to the Korean Central Cancer Registry (KCCR). The sensitivity and the positive predictive value of self-reported histories of cancer were calculated and 95% confidence intervals were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 4,860 participants who had at least one record in the KCCR were included in the calculation of sensitivity. In addition, 3,671 participants who reported a cancer history at enrollment were included in the calculation of positive predictive value. The overall sensitivity of self-reported cancer history was 72.0%. Breast cancer history among women showed the highest sensitivity (81.2%), whereas the lowest sensitivity was observed for liver cancer (53.7%) and cervical cancer (52.1%). The overall positive predictive value was 81.9%. The highest positive predictive value was observed for thyroid cancer (96.1%) and prostate cancer (96.1%), and the lowest was observed for cervical cancer (43.7%).

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of self-reported cancer history varied by cancer site and may not be sufficient to ascertain cancer incidence, especially for cervical and bladder cancers.

摘要

目的

通过与癌症登记数据库进行数据关联,评估队列研究参与者自我报告的癌症病史的有效性。

方法

我们纳入了2004年至2013年间招募的143,965名健康体检者(HEXA)研究的参与者,他们均已签署知情同意书,同意将记录与韩国中央癌症登记处(KCCR)进行关联。计算了自我报告的癌症病史的敏感性和阳性预测值,并估计了95%置信区间。

结果

共有4860名在KCCR至少有一条记录的参与者被纳入敏感性计算。此外,3671名在入组时报告有癌症病史的参与者被纳入阳性预测值计算。自我报告的癌症病史的总体敏感性为72.0%。女性乳腺癌病史的敏感性最高(81.2%),而肝癌(53.7%)和宫颈癌(52.1%)的敏感性最低。总体阳性预测值为81.9%。甲状腺癌(96.1%)和前列腺癌(96.1%)的阳性预测值最高,而宫颈癌(43.7%)的阳性预测值最低。

结论

自我报告的癌症病史的准确性因癌症部位而异,可能不足以确定癌症发病率,尤其是对于宫颈癌和膀胱癌。

相似文献

1
Validity of self-reported cancer history in the health examinees (HEXA) study: A comparison of self-report and cancer registry records.健康体检者(HEXA)研究中自我报告癌症病史的有效性:自我报告与癌症登记记录的比较
Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;50(Pt A):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
2
The validity of self-reported cancer in an Australian population study.澳大利亚人群研究中自我报告癌症的有效性。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Feb;38(1):35-8. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12164.
3
Validity of self-reported cancers in a prospective cohort study in comparison with data from state cancer registries.在前瞻性队列研究中,自我报告的癌症与州癌症登记处数据相比的有效性。
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Mar 15;147(6):556-62. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009487.
4
Validity of self-reported cancer: Comparison between self-report versus cancer registry records in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.癌症自我报告的有效性:在基隆骨质疏松研究中自我报告与癌症登记记录的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;68:101790. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101790. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
Validity of self-reported cancer history: a comparison of health interview data and cancer registry records.自我报告的癌症病史的有效性:健康访谈数据与癌症登记记录的比较
Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Feb 1;153(3):299-306. doi: 10.1093/aje/153.3.299.
6
Validity of self-reported cancer among a Japanese population: recent results from a population-based prospective study in Japan (JPHC Study).日本人群中自我报告癌症的有效性:来自日本一项基于人群的前瞻性研究(JPHC 研究)的最新结果。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;35(3):250-3. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
7
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.意大利癌症数据——2015年报告:意大利罕见癌症的负担
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.
8
Validity of Self-reported Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Korea: The Health Examinees (HEXA) Study.韩国自我报告的中风和心肌梗死的有效性:健康检查者(HEXA)研究。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2019 Nov;52(6):377-383. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.19.089. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
9
The validity of self-reported cancer diagnoses and factors associated with accurate reporting in a cohort of older Australian women.澳大利亚老年女性队列中自我报告癌症诊断的有效性及与准确报告相关的因素。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;35(6):e75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
10
Agreement between self-reported and central cancer registry-recorded prevalence of cancer in the Alaska EARTH study.阿拉斯加地球研究中自我报告的癌症患病率与中央癌症登记记录的癌症患病率之间的一致性。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2019 Dec;78(1):1571383. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2019.1571383.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating healthcare utilization databases for cancer ascertainment in a prospective cohort in a limited resource setting: the Mexican Teachers' Cohort.在资源有限的环境下,将医疗保健利用数据库整合用于前瞻性队列研究中的癌症确诊:墨西哥教师队列研究
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jul;36(7):733-742. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-01973-w. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Adherence to the Cancer Prevention Recommendations from World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research After Cancer Diagnosis on Mortality in South Korea.韩国癌症诊断后遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究学会的癌症预防建议对死亡率的影响
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 26;16(23):4049. doi: 10.3390/nu16234049.
3
Validation of self-reported morbidities in the Korean Atomic Bomb Survivor Cohort.
韩国原子弹爆炸幸存者队列中自我报告疾病的验证。
Epidemiol Health. 2024;46:e2024058. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2024058. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
4
Linking population-based cohorts with cancer registries in LMIC: a case study and lessons learnt in India.将基于人群的队列与中低收入国家的癌症登记处进行关联:印度的案例研究和经验教训。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 6;13(3):e068644. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068644.
5
Validation of Self-Reported Cancer Diagnoses by Respondent Cognitive Status in the U.S. Health and Retirement Study.美国健康与退休研究中基于受访者认知状态的自我报告癌症诊断的验证。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Jul 8;78(7):1239-1245. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac248.
6
Association between Obesity Indexes and Thyroid Cancer Risk in Korean Women: Nested Case-Control Study.韩国女性肥胖指数与甲状腺癌风险的关联:巢式病例对照研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;14(19):4712. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194712.
7
Ascertainment of Incident Cancer by US Population-Based Cancer Registries Versus Self-Reports and Death Certificates in a Nationwide Cohort Study, the US Radiologic Technologists Study.基于美国人群癌症登记处、自我报告和死亡证明的美国全国队列研究中癌症发病的确定:美国放射技师研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 19;191(12):2075-2083. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac121.
8
Association between Micronutrient Intake and Breast Cancer Risk According to Body Mass Index in South Korean Adult Women: A Cohort Study.根据 BMI 分析韩国成年女性的微量营养素摄入与乳腺癌风险的关系:一项队列研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 26;14(13):2644. doi: 10.3390/nu14132644.
9
Validation of Identifying Cancer Diagnosis Based on Self-Reported Information in the Japan Nurses' Health Study.基于日本护士健康研究中自我报告信息识别癌症诊断的验证。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Feb 1;23(2):651-657. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.2.651.
10
Reliability and Validity of a Nationwide Survey (the Korean Radiation Workers Study).一项全国性调查(韩国辐射工作者研究)的信度与效度
Saf Health Work. 2021 Dec;12(4):445-451. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Jul 28.