Suppr超能文献

一种方案真的适用于所有人吗?德国一项非特定诊断的综合心理健康护理项目在前瞻性平行组对照多中心试验中的有效性。

Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial.

作者信息

Mueller-Stierlin Annabel Sandra, Helmbrecht Marina Julia, Herder Katrin, Prinz Stefanie, Rosenfeld Nadine, Walendzik Julia, Holzmann Marco, Dinc Uemmueguelsuem, Schützwohl Matthias, Becker Thomas, Kilian Reinhold

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm, Germany.

Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1441-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Network for Mental Health (NWpG-IC) is an integrated mental health care program implemented in 2009 by cooperation between health insurance companies and community mental health providers in Germany. Meanwhile about 10,000 patients have been enrolled. This is the first study evaluating the effectiveness of the program in comparison to standard mental health care in Germany.

METHODS

In a parallel-group controlled trial over 18 months conducted in five regions across Germany, a total of 260 patients enrolled in NWpG-IC and 251 patients in standard mental health care (TAU) were recruited between August 2013 and November 2014. The NWpG-IC patients had access to special services such as community-based multi-professional teams, case management, crisis intervention and family-oriented psychoeducation in addition to standard mental health care. The primary outcome empowerment (EPAS) and the secondary outcomes quality of life (WHO-QoL-BREF), satisfaction with psychiatric treatment (CSQ-8), psychosocial and clinical impairment (HoNOS) and information about mental health service needs (CAN) were measured four times at 6-month intervals. Linear mixed-effect regression models were used to estimate the main effects and interaction effects of treatment, time and primary diagnosis. Due to the non-randomised group assignment, propensity score adjustment was used to control the selection bias.

RESULTS

NWpG-IC and TAU groups did not differ with respect to most primary and secondary outcomes in our participating patients who showed a broad spectrum of psychiatric diagnoses and illness severities. However, a significant improvement in terms of patients' satisfaction with psychiatric care and their perception of treatment participation in favour of the NWpG-IC group was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing integrated mental health care for unspecific mentally ill target groups increases treatment participation and service satisfaction but seems not suitable to enhance the overall outcomes of mental health care in Germany. The implementation of strategies for ameliorating the needs orientation of the NWpG-IC should be considered.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00005111 , registered 26 July 2013.

摘要

背景

心理健康网络(NWpG - IC)是德国健康保险公司与社区心理健康服务机构于2009年合作实施的一项综合心理健康护理项目。目前已有约10000名患者登记参与。这是第一项评估该项目与德国标准心理健康护理相比有效性的研究。

方法

在德国五个地区进行的一项为期18个月的平行组对照试验中,2013年8月至2014年11月期间,共招募了260名登记参与NWpG - IC的患者和251名接受标准心理健康护理(常规治疗)的患者。除标准心理健康护理外,NWpG - IC患者还可获得社区多专业团队、病例管理、危机干预和家庭导向心理教育等特殊服务。主要结局指标赋权感(EPAS)和次要结局指标生活质量(WHO - QoL - BREF)、对精神科治疗的满意度(CSQ - 8)、心理社会及临床损害(HoNOS)以及心理健康服务需求信息(CAN)每隔6个月测量一次,共测量4次。采用线性混合效应回归模型估计治疗、时间和主要诊断的主效应及交互效应。由于分组并非随机,因此采用倾向得分调整来控制选择偏倚。

结果

在我们纳入的具有广泛精神科诊断和疾病严重程度的患者中,NWpG - IC组和常规治疗组在大多数主要和次要结局指标上并无差异。然而,发现NWpG - IC组患者对精神科护理的满意度及其对治疗参与度的认知有显著改善。

结论

为未明确诊断的精神疾病目标群体提供综合心理健康护理可提高治疗参与度和服务满意度,但似乎并不适合改善德国心理健康护理的整体结局。应考虑实施改善NWpG - IC需求导向的策略。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心DRKS00005111,于2013年7月26日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2798/5539984/f2dc0e8323d1/12888_2017_1441_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验