Hjollund Niels Henrik Ingvar
WestChronic, Occupational Medicine, University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Herning, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 1;19(8):e278. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8111.
Information to the patient about the long-term prognosis of symptom burden and functioning is an integrated part of clinical practice, but relies mostly on the clinician's personal experience. Relevant prognostic models based on patient-reported outcome (PRO) data with repeated measurements are rarely available.
The aim was to describe a generic method for individual long-term prognosis of symptom burden and functioning that implied few statistical presumptions, to evaluate an implementation for prognosis of depressive symptoms in stroke patients and to provide open access to a Web-based prototype of this implementation for individual use.
The method used to describe individual prognosis of a PRO outcome was based on the selection of a specific subcohort of patients who have the same score as the patient in question at the same time (eg, after diagnosis or treatment start), plus or minus one unit of minimal clinically important difference. This subcohort's experienced courses were then used to provide quantitative measures of prognosis over time. A cohort of 1404 stroke patients provided data for a simulation study and a prototype for individual use. Members of the cohort answered questionnaires every 6 months for 3.5 years. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and a single item from the SF-12 (MH4) health survey. Four approaches were compared in a simulation study in which the prognosis for each member of the cohort was individually assessed.
The mean standard deviations were 40% to 70% higher in simulated scores. Mean errors were close to zero, and mean absolute errors were between 0.46 and 0.66 SD in the four approaches. An approach in which missing HADS scores were estimated from the single-item SF-12 MH4 performed marginally better than methods restricted to questionnaires with a genuine HADS score, which indicates that data collected with shorter questionnaires (eg, in clinical practice) may be used together with longer versions with the full scale, given that the design includes at least two simultaneous measurements of the full scale and the surrogate measure.
This is the first description and implementation of a nonparametric method for individual PRO-based prognosis. Given that relevant PRO data have been collected longitudinally, the method may be applied to other patient groups and to any outcome related to symptom burden and functioning. This initial implementation has been deliberately made simple, and further elaborations as well as the usability and clinical validity of the method will be scrutinized in clinical practice. An implementation of the prototype is available online at www.prognosis.dk.
向患者提供有关症状负担和功能的长期预后信息是临床实践的一个组成部分,但主要依赖临床医生的个人经验。基于患者报告结局(PRO)数据并进行重复测量的相关预后模型很少见。
旨在描述一种对症状负担和功能进行个体长期预后的通用方法,该方法所需的统计假设较少,评估其在中风患者抑郁症状预后中的应用,并提供基于网络的该应用原型以供个人使用。
用于描述PRO结局个体预后的方法基于选择一组特定的患者亚组,这些患者在同一时间(例如,诊断后或治疗开始后)与所讨论的患者具有相同的分数,上下浮动一个最小临床重要差异单位。然后使用该亚组的经验历程来提供随时间变化的预后定量测量。一组1404名中风患者为模拟研究和个人使用原型提供了数据。该队列的成员在3.5年中每6个月回答一次问卷。通过医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和SF-12健康调查中的一个单项(MH4)评估抑郁症状。在一项模拟研究中比较了四种方法,在该研究中对队列中的每个成员的预后进行了单独评估。
模拟分数的平均标准差高出40%至70%。平均误差接近零,四种方法的平均绝对误差在0.46至0.66个标准差之间。一种根据单项SF-12 MH4估计缺失HADS分数的方法略优于仅限于具有真实HADS分数问卷的方法,这表明如果设计包括至少两次对完整量表和替代测量的同时测量,那么用较短问卷(例如在临床实践中)收集的数据可以与完整量表的较长版本一起使用。
这是首次对基于个体PRO的预后非参数方法进行描述和应用。鉴于已纵向收集了相关的PRO数据,则该方法可应用于其他患者群体以及与症状负担和功能相关的任何结局。此初始应用已特意简化,该方法的进一步完善以及可用性和临床有效性将在临床实践中进行审查。该原型的应用可在www.prognosis.dk在线获取。