Suppr超能文献

集约放牧和玉米青贮以提高墨西哥高地小规模奶牛养殖系统的可持续性。

Intensive grazing and maize silage to enhance the sustainability of small-scale dairy systems in the highlands of Mexico.

作者信息

Prospero-Bernal Fernando, Martínez-García Carlos Galdino, Olea-Pérez Rafael, López-González Felipe, Arriaga-Jordán Carlos Manuel

机构信息

Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Instituto Literario #100, 50000, Toluca, Estado de México, Mexico.

Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Av. Universidad #3000, 04510, Coyoacan, CDMX, Mexico.

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Oct;49(7):1537-1544. doi: 10.1007/s11250-017-1360-2. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

Abstract

The effects of two innovative feeding strategies-intensive grazing (GR) and maize silage (MS)-on the sustainability of small-scale dairy systems (SSDS) were assessed in the highlands of central Mexico. On a total of 24 farms, four innovations were adopted between 2011 and 2014. Five farms continued their conventional feeding strategy (CC) of cut-and-carry pasture supplemented with commercial concentrate and ground corn grain, as well as straws (maize, oat, and wheat) in the dry season of feed scarcity; six farms implemented MS in the dry season; six farms GR of pastures; and seven farms implemented both GR and MS. Assessment in 2015 showed that farms which implemented both GR and MS had a higher local diversity score (P ≤ 0.001), higher scores for ethics and human development, and a higher score in economic independence (P ≤ 0.05) than farms that implemented only one of the innovations. The overall sustainability score (with range 0-100) was 46 for CC, 47 for MS, 52 for GR, and 55 for GR + MS. The innovations reduced feeding costs and enhanced sustainability, particularly when GR + MS were both implemented.

摘要

在墨西哥中部高地,评估了两种创新饲养策略——集约放牧(GR)和玉米青贮(MS)——对小规模奶牛养殖系统(SSDS)可持续性的影响。在总共24个农场中,2011年至2014年间采用了四项创新措施。五个农场继续采用其传统饲养策略(CC),即在饲料短缺的旱季,采用割运式牧场,并辅以商业浓缩饲料、磨碎的玉米粒以及秸秆(玉米、燕麦和小麦);六个农场在旱季实施MS;六个农场对牧场进行GR;七个农场同时实施GR和MS。2015年的评估表明,与仅实施一种创新措施的农场相比,同时实施GR和MS的农场具有更高的当地多样性得分(P≤0.001)、更高的道德和人类发展得分以及更高的经济独立性得分(P≤0.05)。总体可持续性得分(范围为0 - 100),CC为46分,MS为47分,GR为52分,GR + MS为55分。这些创新措施降低了饲养成本并提高了可持续性,特别是当同时实施GR和MS时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验