Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):3073-3081. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5936-x. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
BACKGROUND: Some suggest that lymph node (LN) evaluation not be performed routinely in women aged ≥70 years with clinically (c) LN-negative (-), hormone receptor (HR)-positive (+) breast cancer. We sought to determine the association of omission of LN evaluation on survival. METHODS: Patients who met the above criteria and were diagnosed from 2004 to 2012 were identified in the NCDB and SEER databases. Overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were determined. RESULTS: Using the NCDB, we identified 157,584 cLN- HR+ patients aged ≥70 years in whom survival and LN evaluation data were available. A total of 126,638 patients (80.2%) had regional LN surgery. With a median follow-up of 41.6 months, there was a significant difference in OS between those who had LN evaluation and those who did not (median OS: 100.5 vs. 70.9 months, respectively, p < 0.001). After adjusting for patient age, race, insurance, income, comorbidities, tumor characteristics and treatment, patients who had undergone LN evaluation still had a lower hazard rate for death than those who had not (hazard ratio = 0.633; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.613-0.654, p < 0.001). We then did a parallel analysis using SEER data that showed LN evaluation was associated with a lower hazard rate for both BCSS (hazard ratio = 0.452; 95% CI 0.427-0.479, p < 0.001) and non-BCSS (hazard ratio = 0.465; 95% CI 0.447-0.482, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Roughly 20% of patients older than aged 70 years with cLN-, HR+ breast cancer did not have LN evaluation. Those who did had better OS controlling for sociodemographic, pathologic, and treatment variables; however, this may be due to patient selection.
背景:一些人建议,对于临床淋巴结阴性(cLN-)、激素受体阳性(HR+)的≥70 岁女性乳腺癌患者,无需常规进行淋巴结评估。我们旨在确定省略淋巴结评估对生存的影响。
方法:在 NCDB 和 SEER 数据库中,确定符合上述标准且于 2004 年至 2012 年诊断为患者。确定总体生存率(OS)和乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)。
结果:利用 NCDB,我们在≥70 岁的 cLN-HR+患者中识别出 157584 例具有生存和淋巴结评估数据的患者。共有 126638 例(80.2%)患者进行了区域淋巴结手术。中位随访 41.6 个月,行淋巴结评估的患者与未行淋巴结评估的患者之间的 OS 存在显著差异(中位 OS:100.5 与 70.9 个月,p<0.001)。在调整患者年龄、种族、保险、收入、合并症、肿瘤特征和治疗后,行淋巴结评估的患者死亡的危险率仍低于未行淋巴结评估的患者(危险比=0.633;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.613-0.654,p<0.001)。然后,我们使用 SEER 数据进行平行分析,结果表明淋巴结评估与 BCSS(危险比=0.452;95%CI:0.427-0.479,p<0.001)和非 BCSS(危险比=0.465;95%CI:0.447-0.482,p<0.001)的危险率降低均相关。
结论:约 20%的≥70 岁 cLN-HR+乳腺癌患者未行淋巴结评估。行淋巴结评估的患者 OS 更好,控制了社会人口统计学、病理和治疗变量;然而,这可能是由于患者选择。
Breast J. 2024-5-24