Hidalgo D A, Shaw W W
Clin Plast Surg. 1986 Oct;13(4):663-80.
Foot injuries constitute a spectrum of problems that can be classified by severity. The development of successful techniques for the treatment of lower leg injuries has made the severity of a concomitant foot injury a key factor in determining the overall salvageability of the leg. A more complete classification of foot injuries is therefore needed and has been proposed. Preoperative assessment of foot injuries differs in the acute versus the delayed presentation. The acute case requires evaluation of wound conditions, exposed structures, and associated proximal injuries. The chronic injury requires gait analysis, study of weight-bearing patterns by Harris mat prints, skeletal evaluation, mapping of plantar sensation, and, in some cases, angiography. Thorough knowledge of foot anatomy is essential for developing a rational plan for treatment. The significance and course of the medial calcaneal nerve and the anatomy of the plantar nerves have not been fully appreciated in most reports on the treatment of foot injuries. The recognition of the proximal plantar subcutaneous plexus blood supply has modified the understanding of plantar flap design. It has simplified and improved the safety of dissection of sensate plantar flaps. A plethora of both local and distant flap options exist for the treatment of foot injuries. The foot is divided into four major areas based on different requirements for reconstruction and the types of flaps available. These areas are the proximal plantar area; the malleoli, Achilles tendon, and posterior (non-weight-bearing) heel area; the distal plantar area; and the dorsum. The options for coverage have been discussed in detail, and a summary of the reconstructive strategy by area has been presented in Table 3. Complex (type III) injuries are special injuries owing to their severity and multiple components. They require a careful initial evaluation for both feasibility and advisability of extremity salvage. Treatment of these injuries consists of bony stabilization and soft-tissue debridement followed by flap coverage.
足部损伤构成了一系列可按严重程度分类的问题。治疗小腿损伤的成功技术的发展使得伴随的足部损伤的严重程度成为决定腿部整体可挽救性的关键因素。因此,需要并已提出更完整的足部损伤分类。足部损伤的术前评估在急性与延迟表现方面有所不同。急性病例需要评估伤口情况、暴露的结构以及相关的近端损伤。慢性损伤需要进行步态分析、通过哈里斯足印研究负重模式、骨骼评估、足底感觉映射,在某些情况下还需要进行血管造影。对足部解剖结构的全面了解对于制定合理的治疗计划至关重要。在大多数关于足部损伤治疗的报告中,内侧跟骨神经的意义和走行以及足底神经的解剖结构尚未得到充分认识。对近端足底皮下丛血供的认识改变了对足底皮瓣设计的理解。它简化并提高了感觉性足底皮瓣解剖的安全性。治疗足部损伤有大量的局部和远处皮瓣选择。根据重建的不同要求和可用皮瓣的类型,足部被分为四个主要区域。这些区域是近端足底区域;内外踝、跟腱和足跟后部(非负重)区域;远端足底区域;以及足背。已详细讨论了覆盖的选择,并在表3中列出了按区域的重建策略总结。复杂(III型)损伤因其严重程度和多成分性而属于特殊损伤。它们需要对肢体挽救的可行性和可取性进行仔细的初步评估。这些损伤的治疗包括骨稳定和软组织清创,然后进行皮瓣覆盖。