Kawaguchi Mika, Matsudaira Ko, Sawada Takayuki, Koga Tadashi, Ishizuka Akiko, Isomura Tatsuya, Coggon David
Clinical Study Support, Inc., 2F Daiei Bldg., 1-11-20 Nishiki, Naka-ku, Nagoya, 460-0003, Japan.
Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 2;18(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1686-y.
Most studies of risk factors for new low back pain (LBP) have been conducted in Western populations, but because of cultural and environmental differences, the impact of causal factors may not be the same in other countries. We used longitudinal data from the Cultural and Psychosocial Influences on Disability (CUPID) study to assess risk factors for new onset of disabling LBP among Japanese workers.
Data came from a 1-year prospective follow-up of nurses, office workers, sales/marketing personnel, and transportation workers, initially aged 20-59 years, who were employed in or near Tokyo. A baseline questionnaire included items on past history of LBP, personal characteristics, ergonomic work demands, and work-related psychosocial factors. Further information about LBP was collected at follow-up. Analysis was restricted to participants who had been free from LBP during the 12 months before baseline. Logistic regression was used to assess baseline risk factors for new onset of disabling LBP (i.e. LBP that had interfered with work) during the 12 months of follow-up.
Among 955 participants free from LBP during the 12 months before baseline, 58 (6.1%) reported a new episode of disabling LBP during the 12-month follow-up period. After mutual adjustment in a multivariate logistic regression analysis, which included the four factors that showed associations individually (p < 0.1) in analyses adjusted only for gender and age, the highest odds ratio (OR) was for past history of LBP (2.8, 95% [confidence interval {CI}]: 1.6-4.9), followed by working ≥60 h per week (1.8, 95% CI: 1.0-3.5) and lifting weights ≥25 kg by hand (1.6, 95% CI: 0.9-3.0). When past history of LBP was excluded from the model, ORs for the remaining risk factors were virtually unchanged.
Our findings suggest that among Japanese workers, as elsewhere, past history of LBP is a major risk factor for the development of new episodes of disabling back pain. They give limited support to the association with occupational lifting that has been observed in earlier research, both in Japan and in Western countries. In addition, they suggest a possible role of long working hours, which merits further investigation.
大多数关于新发下背痛(LBP)风险因素的研究是在西方人群中进行的,但由于文化和环境差异,这些因果因素在其他国家的影响可能不尽相同。我们利用文化和社会心理因素对残疾的影响(CUPID)研究中的纵向数据,评估日本工人新发致残性LBP的风险因素。
数据来自对护士、办公室职员、销售/营销人员和运输工人进行的为期1年的前瞻性随访,这些工人最初年龄在20 - 59岁,就职于东京或其附近地区。基线调查问卷包括有关LBP既往史、个人特征、工作中的人体工程学需求以及与工作相关的社会心理因素等项目。在随访时收集有关LBP的进一步信息。分析仅限于在基线前12个月内无LBP的参与者。采用逻辑回归评估在12个月随访期间新发致残性LBP(即干扰工作的LBP)的基线风险因素。
在基线前12个月内无LBP的955名参与者中,58名(6.1%)在12个月的随访期内报告了新发的致残性LBP。在多变量逻辑回归分析中进行相互调整后,该分析纳入了在仅针对性别和年龄进行调整的分析中各自显示出关联(p < 0.1)的四个因素,最高的优势比(OR)是LBP既往史(2.8,95% [置信区间{CI}]:1.6 - 4.9),其次是每周工作≥60小时(1.8,95% CI:1.0 - 3.5)以及手动搬运重物≥25千克(1.6,95% CI:0.9 - 3.0)。当将LBP既往史从模型中排除时,其余风险因素的OR值几乎未变。
我们的研究结果表明,在日本工人中,与其他地方一样,LBP既往史是新发致残性背痛发作的主要风险因素。它们对日本和西方国家早期研究所观察到的与职业性搬运的关联支持有限。此外,它们表明长时间工作可能起到一定作用,这值得进一步研究。