Campos-Fumero Adriana, Delclos George L, Douphrate David I, Felknor Sarah A, Vargas-Prada Sergio, Serra Consol, Coggon David, Gimeno Ruiz de Porras David
School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago, Costa Rica.
Inj Prev. 2017 Jun;23(3):158-164. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042091. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
To assess the differences in the prevalence and incidence of low back pain (LBP) and associated disability among office workers in Costa Rica, Nicaragua and Spain.
Data were collected at baseline (n=947, 93% response) in November 2007 and at follow-up after 12 months (n=853, 90% response). Six outcome measures were examined: baseline prevalence of (1) LBP in the past 12 months, (2) LBP in the past month and (3) disabling LBP in the past month; and at follow-up: (4) incidence of new LBP in the past month, (5) new disabling LBP and (6) persistent LBP. Differences in prevalence by country were characterised by ORs with 95% CIs, before and after adjustment for covariates.
Prevalence of LBP in the past month among office employees in Costa Rica (46.0%) and Nicaragua (44.2%) was higher than in Spain (33.6%). Incidence of new LBP was 37.0% in Nicaragua (OR=2.49; 95% CI 1.57 to 3.95), 14.9% in Costa Rica (OR=0.74; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.34) and 19.0% in Spain (reference). Incidence of new disabling LBP was higher in Nicaragua (17.2%; OR=2.49; 95% CI 1.43 to 4.34) and Costa Rica (13.6%; OR=1.89; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.48) than Spain (7.7%), while persistence of LBP was higher only in Nicaragua.
Prevalence of LBP and disabling LBP was higher in Costa Rican and Nicaraguan office workers than in Spain, but the incidence was higher mainly in Nicaragua. Measured sociodemographic, job-related and health-related variables only partly explained the differences between countries, and further research is needed to explore reasons for the remaining differences.
评估哥斯达黎加、尼加拉瓜和西班牙办公室职员中腰痛(LBP)的患病率和发病率以及相关残疾情况的差异。
于2007年11月收集基线数据(n = 947,应答率93%),并在12个月后进行随访(n = 853,应答率90%)。检查了六项结果指标:(1)过去12个月的腰痛患病率,(2)过去一个月的腰痛患病率,(3)过去一个月的致残性腰痛患病率;随访时检查:(4)过去一个月新发生的腰痛发病率,(5)新发生的致残性腰痛发病率,(6)持续性腰痛发病率。在对协变量进行调整前后,通过带有95%置信区间的比值比来描述各国患病率的差异。
哥斯达黎加(46.0%)和尼加拉瓜(44.2%)办公室职员过去一个月的腰痛患病率高于西班牙(33.6%)。尼加拉瓜新发生腰痛的发病率为37.0%(比值比 = 2.49;95%置信区间1.57至3.95),哥斯达黎加为14.9%(比值比 = 0.74;95%置信区间0.41至1.34),西班牙为19.0%(参照)。尼加拉瓜(17.2%;比值比 = 2.49;95%置信区间1.43至4.34)和哥斯达黎加([13.6%;比值比 = 1.89;95%置信区间1.03至3.48])新发生的致残性腰痛发病率高于西班牙(7.7%),而只有尼加拉瓜的腰痛持续性较高。
哥斯达黎加和尼加拉瓜办公室职员的腰痛和致残性腰痛患病率高于西班牙,但发病率主要在尼加拉瓜较高。所测量的社会人口学、与工作相关和与健康相关的变量仅部分解释了各国之间的差异,需要进一步研究以探索其余差异的原因。