Mitchell Paul Mark, Roberts Tracy E, Barton Pelham M, Coast Joanna
Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine, School of Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, London, UK.
Soc Indic Res. 2017;133(1):345-371. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1356-8. Epub 2016 May 10.
The primary aims of this review are to document capability applications in the health field and to explore the objectives and decision-rules of studies measuring capability more broadly. Relevant studies are identified using a literature search strategy known as "comprehensive pearl growing". All studies with a primary focus on health are assessed individually, whilst a summary narrative analysis of the full review examines the objectives of capability studies. Four distinct groups in the health field are identified in the review: (1) physical activity and diet; (2) patient empowerment; (3) multidimensional poverty and (4) assessments of health and social care interventions. Different approaches to applying mixed methods, selecting capability dimensions and weighting capabilities are found across studies. There is a noticeable non-reliance on health status as a sole indicator of capability in health. In terms of objectives of studies measuring capability, although there is a lack of consistency, an objective related to sufficiency of capabilities appeared most often in the studies found in this review. Even though one of the appeals of the capability perspective is its underspecified nature, this review highlights the challenge of finding a coherent alternative to more established approaches of evaluation.
本综述的主要目的是记录能力在健康领域的应用情况,并更广泛地探讨衡量能力的研究的目标和决策规则。使用一种名为“全面珍珠养殖”的文献检索策略来识别相关研究。所有主要关注健康的研究都将单独评估,而对整个综述的总结性叙述分析则考察能力研究的目标。本综述确定了健康领域的四个不同类别:(1)身体活动与饮食;(2)患者赋权;(3)多维贫困;以及(4)健康和社会护理干预措施的评估。各项研究在应用混合方法、选择能力维度和权衡能力方面采用了不同的方法。在健康领域,明显不存在仅将健康状况作为能力唯一指标的情况。就衡量能力的研究目标而言,尽管缺乏一致性,但在本综述中发现的研究中,与能力充分性相关的目标出现得最为频繁。尽管能力视角的一个吸引力在于其性质不够明确,但本综述凸显了寻找一种连贯的替代方法以取代更成熟评估方法的挑战。