• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜医师指导下护士实施镇静在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中的安全性和有效性

Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

作者信息

Cho Yong Suk, Shin Sang Youn, Hwang Changhyeok, Seo Jeonghun, Choi Jong Won, Park Byung Kyu, Won Sun Young, Lee Chun Kyon, Lee Yong Kang, Jeon Han Ho

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Ilsan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:4723626. doi: 10.1155/2017/4723626. Epub 2017 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1155/2017/4723626
PMID:28769979
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5523312/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is routinely performed in treating gastric neoplasia and requires long-term higher levels of sedation. Endoscopist-directed nurse-administered sedation (EDNAS) has not been well studied in ESD. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of EDNAS for ESD.

METHODS

Patients treated with ESD for gastric tumors between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a midazolam-treated group (M group) and a midazolam plus propofol-treated group (MP group). Clinical outcome, safety, effectiveness, adverse events of ESD, and adverse events of sedation were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 209 collected patients, 83 were in the M group and 126 were in the MP group. Of all patients, 67 patients had the circulatory adverse event during the ESD procedure. Sedation method was the only significant risk factor (M versus MP: 2.17 (1.14-4.15), = 0.019). In analysis of MP subgroups, 47 patients suffered an adverse event from sedation, and current smoking was the only significant association factor for adverse event (0.15 (0.03-0.68), = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

In performing ESD, the effect of sedation is reduced in smoking patients. EDNAS may be acceptable for ESD under careful monitoring of vital sign and oxygen saturation.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)常用于治疗胃肿瘤,且需要长期较深的镇静。内镜医师指导下由护士实施的镇静(EDNAS)在ESD中的应用尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估EDNAS用于ESD的安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性收集2013年至2015年间接受ESD治疗胃肿瘤的患者。将患者分为咪达唑仑治疗组(M组)和咪达唑仑联合丙泊酚治疗组(MP组)。分析ESD的临床结局、安全性、有效性、不良事件以及镇静的不良事件。

结果

在收集的209例患者中,M组83例,MP组126例。所有患者中,67例在ESD手术过程中出现循环不良事件。镇静方法是唯一的显著危险因素(M组与MP组比较:2.17(1.14 - 4.15),P = 0.019)。在MP亚组分析中,47例患者出现镇静不良事件,当前吸烟是不良事件的唯一显著相关因素(0.15(0.03 - 0.68),P = 0.014)。

结论

在进行ESD时,吸烟患者的镇静效果会降低。在仔细监测生命体征和血氧饱和度的情况下,EDNAS用于ESD可能是可以接受的。

相似文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of Endoscopist-Directed Nurse-Administered Sedation during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.内镜医师指导下护士实施镇静在胃内镜黏膜下剥离术中的安全性和有效性
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:4723626. doi: 10.1155/2017/4723626. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
2
Propofol Sedation in the Endoscopy Room versus Operation Room during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.在胃镜室与手术室对行内镜黏膜下剥离术的胃肿瘤患者进行异丙酚镇静:倾向评分匹配分析。
Digestion. 2020;101(4):450-457. doi: 10.1159/000500874. Epub 2019 May 24.
3
Comparison of midazolam alone versus midazolam plus propofol during endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜黏膜下剥离术中单纯使用咪达唑仑与咪达唑仑联合丙泊酚的比较。
Clin Endosc. 2011 Sep;44(1):22-6. doi: 10.5946/ce.2011.44.1.22. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
4
Efficacy and safety of sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cancers using a comparative trial of propofol versus midazolam.使用丙泊酚与咪达唑仑对比试验评估胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术中镇静的有效性和安全性。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jan;6(1):E51-E57. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-122225. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Assessing the stability and safety of procedure during endoscopic submucosal dissection according to sedation methods: a randomized trial.根据镇静方法评估内镜黏膜下剥离术中操作的稳定性和安全性:一项随机试验。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0120529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120529. eCollection 2015.
6
Safe and effective sedation in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a randomized comparison between propofol continuous infusion and intermittent midazolam injection.在早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术中安全有效的镇静:丙泊酚持续输注与咪达唑仑间断注射的随机比较。
J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;45(8):831-7. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0222-8. Epub 2010 Mar 13.
7
Efficacy of propofol sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): assessment with prospective data collection.丙泊酚镇静用于内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的疗效:前瞻性数据收集评估
Intern Med. 2011;50(14):1455-60. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.50.4627. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
8
Safety and effectiveness of propofol-based monitored anesthesia care without intubation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric and esophageal cancers.在早期胃癌和食管癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术中,不插管使用依托咪酯为基础的监测麻醉护理的安全性和有效性。
Dig Endosc. 2015 Sep;27(6):665-73. doi: 10.1111/den.12457. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
9
Propofol sedation with bispectral index monitoring is useful for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized prospective phase II clinical trial.异丙酚镇静联合脑电双频指数监测在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的应用:一项随机前瞻性 II 期临床试验。
Endoscopy. 2012 Jun;44(6):584-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1306776. Epub 2012 May 25.
10
Comparison of dexmedetomidine with on-demand midazolam versus midazolam alone for procedural sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumor.在胃肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术中,右美托咪定按需联合咪达唑仑与单纯使用咪达唑仑用于程序镇静的比较。
J Dig Dis. 2015 Jul;16(7):377-84. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12254.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors associated with surveillance loss after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasm.胃肿瘤患者内镜黏膜下剥离术后监测失败的相关危险因素。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1127. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-891.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Nonanesthesiologist-Administrated Propofol during Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Epithelial Tumors.非麻醉医生实施丙泊酚用于胃上皮肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的安全性和有效性
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Jan 10;2019:5937426. doi: 10.1155/2019/5937426. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Morbidity and mortality of endoscopist-directed nurse-administered propofol sedation (EDNAPS) in a tertiary referral center.三级转诊中心内镜医师指导下护士给予丙泊酚镇静(EDNAPS)的发病率和死亡率。
Endosc Int Open. 2015 Oct;3(5):E393-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392511. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
2
Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for endoscopic submucosal dissection.丙泊酚与传统镇静剂在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的比较。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Nov;26(6):701-6. doi: 10.1111/den.12342. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
3
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms in elderly patients.老年患者早期胃肿瘤的内镜黏膜下剥离术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Jun;24(6):391-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0572.
4
Clinical outcomes and risk factors of post-polypectomy coagulation syndrome: a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study.经内镜切除息肉术后凝血综合征的临床转归及其危险因素:一项多中心回顾性病例对照研究。
Endoscopy. 2013;45(3):202-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326104. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
5
Safety and efficacy of deep sedation with propofol alone or combined with midazolam administrated by nonanesthesiologist for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.非麻醉医师单独或联合咪达唑仑给予异丙酚镇静用于胃内镜黏膜下剥离术的安全性和有效性。
Gut Liver. 2012 Oct;6(4):464-70. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2012.6.4.464. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
6
Utility and problems of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in elderly patients.老年患者早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的应用及问题。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;27 Suppl 3:63-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07075.x.
7
Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation: from the exception to standard practice. Sedation and monitoring trends over 20 years.非麻醉医师管理的异丙酚镇静:从例外到标准做法。镇静和监测 20 多年来的趋势。
Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):504-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291668. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
8
Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌后凝血综合征的临床特征及预测因素。
Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):83-90. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0073-x. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
9
Efficacy of propofol sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): assessment with prospective data collection.丙泊酚镇静用于内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的疗效:前瞻性数据收集评估
Intern Med. 2011;50(14):1455-60. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.50.4627. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
10
Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasm: multicenter survey by osaka university ESD study group.早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的短期疗效:大阪大学 ESD 研究组的多中心调查。
Dig Endosc. 2011 Jan;23(1):73-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01062.x.