Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life SciencesWrocław, Poland.
Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of SciencesWrocław, Poland.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jul 19;7:326. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00326. eCollection 2017.
It was suggested that minor differences in the structure of FimH are most likely associated with differences in its adhesion specificities and may determine the tropism of various serovars to different species and tissues. We have recently shown that FimH adhesins from host-adapted serovars, e.g., Choleraesuis (Ch), bind to other glycoprotein receptors compared to FimH from host-unrestricted Enteritidis (E). Here we identify porcine calreticulin expressed by swine intestinal cells as a host-specific receptor for Ch FimH adhesin, suggesting that such an interaction may contribute to Ch host specificity. Calreticulin was identified by 2D electrophoresis and mass spectrometry as a glycoprotein that was bound specifically by recombinant Ch FimH protein, but not by FimH from E. The functionality of calreticulin as a specific receptor of Ch FimH adhesin was further confirmed by adhesion and invasion of mutated strains of Ch carrying different variants of FimH proteins to IPEC-J2 cells with overexpression and silenced expression of calreticulin. It was found that Ch carrying the active variant of FimH adhered and invaded IPEC-J2 cells with calreticulin overexpression at significantly higher numbers than those of SCh expressing the non-active variant or E variant of FimH. Moreover, binding of Ch carrying the active variant of FimH to IPEC-J2 with silenced calreticulin expression was significantly weaker. Furthermore, we observed that Ch infection induces translocation of calreticulin to cell membrane. All of the aforementioned results lead to the general conclusion that host specificity requires not only special mechanisms and proteins expressed by the pathogen but also specifically recognized receptors expressed by a specific host.
有人提出,FimH 结构的微小差异很可能与其黏附特异性有关,并可能决定各种血清型对不同物种和组织的趋向性。我们最近表明,宿主适应血清型(如霍乱弧菌(Ch))的 FimH 黏附素与宿主非限制血清型(肠致病性大肠杆菌(E))的 FimH 相比,与其他糖蛋白受体结合。在这里,我们确定猪肠道细胞表达的钙网织蛋白是 Ch FimH 黏附素的宿主特异性受体,表明这种相互作用可能有助于 Ch 的宿主特异性。钙网织蛋白通过 2D 电泳和质谱鉴定为一种糖蛋白,它被重组 Ch FimH 蛋白特异性结合,但不被来自 E 的 FimH 结合。钙网织蛋白作为 Ch FimH 黏附素的特异性受体的功能进一步通过黏附和侵袭携带不同 FimH 蛋白变体的 Ch 突变株到过表达和沉默表达钙网织蛋白的 IPEC-J2 细胞来证实。发现携带活性变体 FimH 的 Ch 与过表达钙网织蛋白的 IPEC-J2 细胞黏附和侵袭的数量明显高于表达非活性变体或 E 变体 FimH 的 SCh。此外,携带活性变体 FimH 的 Ch 与沉默钙网织蛋白表达的 IPEC-J2 的结合明显较弱。此外,我们观察到 Ch 感染诱导钙网织蛋白向细胞膜易位。所有上述结果得出的总体结论是,宿主特异性不仅需要病原体表达的特殊机制和蛋白,还需要特定宿主表达的特异性识别受体。