Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Via Inama 5, 38122, Trento, Italy.
Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):429-447. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9709-z.
A group of pathological gamblers and a group of problem gamblers (i.e., gamblers at risk of becoming pathological) were compared to healthy controls on their risk-taking propensity after prior losses. Each participant played both the Balloon Analogue Risk Taking task (BART) and a modified version of the same task, where individuals face five repeated predetermined early losses at the onset of the game. No significant difference in risk-taking was found between groups on the standard BART task, while significant differences emerged when comparing behaviors in the two tasks: both pathological gamblers and controls reduced their risk-taking tendency after prior losses in the modified BART compared to the standard BART, whereas problem gamblers showed no reduction in risk-taking after prior losses. We interpret these results as a sign of a reduced sensitivity to negative feedback in problem gamblers which might contribute to explain their loss-chasing tendency.
一组病理性赌博者和一组有问题的赌博者(即有成为病理性赌博者风险的赌博者)在经历先前的损失后,与健康对照组进行了冒险倾向的比较。每位参与者都玩了气球模拟风险任务(BART)和相同任务的一个修改版本,在游戏开始时,个体面临五个重复的预定早期损失。在标准 BART 任务中,各组之间的冒险行为没有显著差异,而在比较两个任务的行为时,出现了显著差异:病理性赌博者和对照组在修改后的 BART 中经历先前的损失后,都降低了他们的冒险倾向,而有问题的赌博者在经历先前的损失后,冒险行为没有减少。我们将这些结果解释为病理性赌博者对负反馈敏感性降低的迹象,这可能有助于解释他们的追损失倾向。