Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Sep;4(3):325-339. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0155-y.
Night work is increasingly common and a necessity in certain sectors of the modern 24-h society. The embedded exposure to light-at-night, which suppresses the nocturnal hormone melatonin with oncostatic properties and circadian disruption, i.e., misalignment between internal and external night and between cells and organs, are suggested as main mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis. In 2007, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified shift work that involves circadian disruption as probably carcinogenic to humans based on limited evidence from eight epidemiologic studies on breast cancer, in addition to sufficient evidence from animal experiments. The aim of this review is a critical update of the IARC evaluation, including subsequent and the most recent epidemiologic evidence on breast cancer risk after night work.
After 2007, in total nine new case-control studies, one case-cohort study, and eight cohort studies are published, which triples the number of studies. Further, two previous cohorts have been updated with extended follow-up. The assessment of night shift work is different in all of the 26 existing studies. There is some evidence that high number of consecutive night shifts has impact on the extent of circadian disruption, and thereby increased breast cancer risk, but this information is missing in almost all cohort studies. This in combination with short-term follow-up of aging cohorts may explain why some cohort studies may have null findings. The more recent case-control studies have contributed interesting results concerning breast cancer subtypes in relation to both menopausal status and different hormonal subtypes. The large differences in definitions of both exposure and outcome may contribute to the observed heterogeneity of results from studies of night work and breast cancer, which overall points in the direction of an increased breast cancer risk, in particular after over 20 years of night shifts. Overall, there is a tendency of increased risk of breast cancer either after over 20 years of night shift or after shorter periods with many consecutive shifts. More epidemiologic research using standardized definitions of night work metrics and breast cancer subtypes as well as other cancers is needed in order to improve the epidemiologic evidence in combination with animal models of night work. Also, evidence-based preventive interventions are needed.
夜间工作在现代 24 小时社会的某些领域越来越普遍,也是必要的。夜间暴露于光线下会抑制具有致癌特性和扰乱昼夜节律的激素褪黑素,即内部和外部夜间之间以及细胞和器官之间的不匹配,被认为是致癌的主要机制。2007 年,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)根据八项关于乳腺癌的流行病学研究的有限证据,以及动物实验的充分证据,将涉及昼夜节律打乱的轮班工作归类为可能对人类致癌。本综述的目的是对 IARC 评估进行批判性更新,包括随后和最近关于夜间工作后乳腺癌风险的流行病学证据。
2007 年以来,共发表了 9 项新的病例对照研究、1 项病例-队列研究和 8 项队列研究,使研究数量增加了两倍。此外,两项以前的队列研究已经进行了更新,随访时间延长。所有 26 项现有研究对夜班工作的评估都不同。有一些证据表明,连续夜班的数量对昼夜节律打乱的程度有影响,从而增加乳腺癌的风险,但几乎所有的队列研究都缺乏这方面的信息。这再加上老年队列的短期随访,可能解释了为什么一些队列研究可能没有发现结果。最近的病例对照研究提供了一些有趣的结果,涉及与绝经状态和不同激素亚型相关的乳腺癌亚型。暴露和结果的定义存在很大差异,这可能导致夜班和乳腺癌研究的结果存在异质性,总体上表明夜班会增加乳腺癌的风险,尤其是在超过 20 年的夜班之后。总的来说,无论是经过 20 多年的夜班工作,还是经过较短时间的连续夜班工作,乳腺癌的风险都有增加的趋势。需要进行更多使用标准化夜班工作指标和乳腺癌亚型以及其他癌症定义的流行病学研究,以结合夜班动物模型来提高流行病学证据。此外,还需要基于证据的预防干预措施。