1State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition,College of Animal Science and Technology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100094,China.
4National Animal Husbandry Station,Beijing 100125,China.
Animal. 2018 Mar;12(3):657-666. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117001902. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
As lack of forage resource, alternative roughage sources have been developed for ruminant production and their inclusion would exert a great effect on the dietary nutrition, consequently affecting animal performance. Four silages (corn silage (CS), corn stalk silage (SS), inoculated CS and inoculated SS) were separately offered to 60 Bohai Black cattle (15 cattle/group) during a 24-week finishing period, in which the growth performance, carcass trait, beef quality and oxidative stability of steers were determined. Neither silage material nor silage inoculant exerted a significant effect on the growth performance, carcass trait and oxidative stability of beef cattle (P>0.05). As to beef quality, cattle offered CS had higher (P0.05) on the proximate components and fatty acids profile of beef muscle. There was neither an interaction (P>0.05) between inoculated treatment and silage material. There were no differences (P>0.05) in cholesterol content and meat quality traits in animals fed alternative silages. The collective findings suggest that it is not economical to substitute high-quality forage for relative low-quality forage in a high-concentrate finishing ration of beef cattle and silage inoculant inclusion would not exert a direct effect on animal performance.
由于饲料资源匮乏,人们开发了一些替代粗饲料来源用于反刍动物生产,这些粗饲料的添加会对日粮的营养产生很大的影响,从而影响动物的生产性能。在为期 24 周的育肥期内,将 4 种青贮饲料(玉米青贮料(CS)、玉米秸秆青贮料(SS)、接种 CS 和接种 SS)分别提供给 60 头渤海黑牛(每组 15 头),以确定育肥牛的生长性能、胴体性状、牛肉质量和氧化稳定性。青贮料材料和青贮接种剂对肉牛的生长性能、胴体性状和氧化稳定性均无显著影响(P>0.05)。至于牛肉质量,饲喂 CS 的牛具有更高的(P<0.05)的粗蛋白和脂肪酸组成。接种处理和青贮料之间没有相互作用(P>0.05)。饲喂不同青贮料的动物的胆固醇含量和肉质性状没有差异(P>0.05)。综上所述,在肉牛高浓缩育肥日粮中用相对低质量的饲料替代高质量的饲料是不经济的,而且青贮接种剂的添加不会对动物的生产性能产生直接影响。