• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.学术医学中心初级教员获得美国国立卫生研究院R01资助的性别差异:人脉、职级和研究生产力的作用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;26(10):1086-1093. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6102. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
2
The Impact of a Junior Faculty Fellowship Award on Academic Advancement and Retention.初级教员奖学金对学术进步和留任的影响。
Acad Med. 2017 Aug;92(8):1160-1167. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001541.
3
Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding.妇产科领域的医师科学家:获得独立研究资金成功与否的预测因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):84.e1-84.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
4
Success in Attaining Independent Funding Among National Institutes of Health K Grant Awardees in Ophthalmology: An Extended Follow-up.在眼科 NIH K 补助金获得者中获得独立资助的成功:延长随访。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 1;136(12):1335-1340. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3887.
5
Sex Differences Among Career Development Awardees in the Attainment of Independent Research Funding in a Department of Medicine.医学系职业发展奖获得者在获得独立研究资金方面的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Nov;24(11):933-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5331. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in faculty promotion in academic medicine.学术医学领域教师晋升中的种族和族裔差异。
JAMA. 2000 Sep 6;284(9):1085-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.9.1085.
7
A Ten-Year Analysis of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding for Anesthesiology Research in United States Medical Schools.美国医学院麻醉学研究中近期美国国立卫生研究院资助的十年分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Jul;36(7):1844-1855. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
8
How to Support a Surgeon Scientist: Lessons from National Institutes of Health K-Award Recipients.如何支持外科医生科学家:来自美国国立卫生研究院 K 奖获得者的经验教训。
J Surg Res. 2021 Apr;260:163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.076. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding to Diagnostic Radiology Departments: Analysis Using the NIH RePORTER System.美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)近期对诊断放射科的资助模式:使用NIH RePORTER系统进行分析
Acad Radiol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1162-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
Gender differences in funding among grant recipients in emergency medicine: A multicenter analysis.在急诊医学领域,资助获得者中的性别差异:一项多中心分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1357-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Composing authorship teams for health equity: an introduction to the health equity research production model.组建促进健康公平的作者团队:健康公平研究产出模式介绍
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 12;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02524-0.
2
Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.探索学术科学六个关键领域的性别偏见:对抗性合作。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2023 Jul;24(1):15-73. doi: 10.1177/15291006231163179. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
3
Gender-based homophily in collaborations across a heterogeneous scholarly landscape.跨异质学术领域合作中的基于性别的同群现象。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283106. eCollection 2023.
4
Increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the fields of nutrition and obesity: A roadmap to equity in academia.在营养和肥胖领域中增加多样性、公平性和包容性:学术界公平的路线图。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Apr;117(4):659-671. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
5
Increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the fields of nutrition and obesity: A road map to equity in academia.在营养和肥胖领域中增加多样性、公平性和包容性:学术界公平之路。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 May;31(5):1240-1254. doi: 10.1002/oby.23704. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
6
Current Status of National Institutes of Health Research Funding for Women Surgeon-Scientists.女性外科医生科学家获得美国国立卫生研究院研究经费的现状。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Dec 1;157(12):1134-1140. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5157.
7
Enhancing Recruitment and Retention of Minority Populations for Clinical Research in Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.提高肺脏、危重症和睡眠医学临床研究中少数民族人群的招募和保留率:美国胸科学会官方研究声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 1;204(3):e26-e50. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1210ST.
8
Representation of Female Faculty at US Medical Schools and Success in Obtaining National Institutes of Health Funding, 2008-2018.2008-2018 年美国医学院女性教员的代表性与获得美国国立卫生研究院资助的成功率
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e210388. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0388.
9
The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.研究资助同行评审和资金决策中的漏洞管道:挑战与未来方向。
High Educ (Dordr). 2021;82(1):145-162. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00626-y. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
10
Federal Funding in Emergency Medicine: Demographics and Perspectives of Awardees.联邦紧急医学基金:获奖者的人口统计学和观点。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb 24;21(2):304-312. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.12.45249.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender disparities in scholarly productivity of US academic surgeons.美国学术外科医生学术产出中的性别差异。
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 1;203(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.060. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
2
Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research Awards: Is There Evidence of a Double Bind for Women of Color?性别、种族/族裔与美国国立卫生研究院R01研究奖:有色人种女性是否存在双重束缚的证据?
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1098-107. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001278.
3
Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?美国国立卫生研究院R01申请评审、影响及标准评分分析:首席研究员的性别有影响吗?
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1080-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001272.
4
Longitudinal Analysis of Gender Differences in Academic Productivity Among Medical Faculty Across 24 Medical Schools in the United States.美国24所医学院校医学教员学术产出性别差异的纵向分析
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1074-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001251.
5
Plenty of moustaches but not enough women: cross sectional study of medical leaders.男性领导者众多,女性却凤毛麟角:医学领域领导者的横断面研究
BMJ. 2015 Dec 16;351:h6311. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6311.
6
Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014.2014年美国医学院校学术排名中的性别差异。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1149-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10680.
7
Sex Differences Among Career Development Awardees in the Attainment of Independent Research Funding in a Department of Medicine.医学系职业发展奖获得者在获得独立研究资金方面的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Nov;24(11):933-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5331. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
8
Faculty Promotion and Attrition: The Importance of Coauthor Network Reach at an Academic Medical Center.教员晋升与人员流失:学术医疗中心共同作者网络影响力的重要性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3463-7.
9
Possible reasons why female physicians publish fewer scientific articles than male physicians - a cross-sectional study.女医生发表的科学文章少于男医生的可能原因——一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 2;15:67. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0347-9.
10
Considering context in academic medicine: differences in demographic and professional characteristics and in research productivity and advancement metrics across seven clinical departments.考量学术医学中的背景因素:七个临床科室在人口统计学和专业特征、研究生产力以及进步指标方面的差异。
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1077-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000717.

学术医学中心初级教员获得美国国立卫生研究院R01资助的性别差异:人脉、职级和研究生产力的作用。

Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.

作者信息

Warner Erica T, Carapinha René, Weber Griffin M, Hill Emorcia V, Reede Joan Y

机构信息

1 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts.

2 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;26(10):1086-1093. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6102. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2016.6102
PMID:28771391
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5651959/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there were gender differences in likelihood of receiving a first National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 award among 5445 instructors and assistant professors at Harvard Medical School (HMS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on R01 award principal investigators were obtained from NIH ExPORTER and linked with faculty data. Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we examined the association of gender with receipt of first R01 award between 2008 and 2015 accounting for demographics, research productivity metrics, and professional characteristics.

RESULTS

Compared to males, females had fewer publications, lower h-index, smaller coauthor networks and were less likely to be assistant professors (p < 0.0001). Four hundred and thirteen of 5445 faculty (7.6%) received their first R01 award during the study period. There was no gender difference in receipt of R01 awards in age-adjusted (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.08) or multivariable-adjusted models (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.86-1.34). Compared to white males, there was a nonsignificant 10%, 18%, and 30% lower rate of R01 receipt among white, Asian or Pacific Islander, and underrepresented minority females, respectively. These differences were eliminated in the multivariable-adjusted model. Network reach, age, HMS start year, h-index, academic rank, previous K award, terminal degree, and HMS training were all significant predictors of receiving an R01 award.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively small proportion of HMS junior faculty obtained their first NIH R01 award during the study period. There was no significant gender difference in likelihood of award. However, we are unable to distinguish faculty that never applied from those who applied and were not successful.

摘要

目的

确定哈佛医学院(HMS)的5445名讲师和助理教授中,获得首个美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)R01奖的可能性是否存在性别差异。

材料与方法

从NIH ExPORTER获取R01奖主要研究者的数据,并与教员数据相关联。使用Cox比例风险回归,我们研究了2008年至2015年间性别与获得首个R01奖之间的关联,同时考虑了人口统计学、研究生产力指标和专业特征。

结果

与男性相比,女性发表的论文较少,h指数较低,共同作者网络较小,且不太可能成为助理教授(p < 0.0001)。在研究期间,5445名教员中有413人(7.6%)获得了首个R01奖。在年龄调整模型(风险比[HR]:0.87,95%置信区间[CI]:0.70 - 1.08)或多变量调整模型(HR:1.07,95% CI:0.86 - 1.34)中,获得R01奖的情况不存在性别差异。与白人男性相比,白人、亚裔或太平洋岛民以及代表性不足的少数族裔女性获得R01奖的比例分别低10%、18%和30%,但差异不显著。在多变量调整模型中,这些差异被消除。网络影响力、年龄、在HMS的起始年份、h指数、学术职称、之前的K奖、最终学位以及在HMS的培训都是获得R01奖的显著预测因素。

结论

在研究期间,相对较少比例的HMS初级教员获得了首个NIH R01奖。获奖可能性不存在显著的性别差异。然而,我们无法区分从未申请的教员和申请但未成功的教员。