• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Considering context in academic medicine: differences in demographic and professional characteristics and in research productivity and advancement metrics across seven clinical departments.考量学术医学中的背景因素:七个临床科室在人口统计学和专业特征、研究生产力以及进步指标方面的差异。
Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1077-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000717.
2
The transforming power of early career acute care surgery research scholarships on academic productivity.早期职业急性护理外科研究奖学金对学术产出的变革力量。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Jul;81(1):137-43. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001066.
3
Comparing National Institutes of Health funding of emergency medicine to four medical specialties.比较美国国立卫生研究院对急诊医学与四个医学专业的资助。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):1001-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01138.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
4
Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.学术医学中心初级教员获得美国国立卫生研究院R01资助的性别差异:人脉、职级和研究生产力的作用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;26(10):1086-1093. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6102. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
5
Examination of publications from academic anesthesiology faculty in the United States.检查美国学术麻醉学教师的出版物。
Anesth Analg. 2014 Jan;118(1):192-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a91aa9.
6
Gender differences in career development awards in United States' anesthesiology and surgery departments, 2006-2016.2006 - 2016年美国麻醉学与外科部门职业发展奖中的性别差异
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul 27;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0561-1.
7
Sex Differences in Academic Rank and Publication Rate at Top-Ranked US Neurology Programs.顶尖美国神经病学项目的学术排名和发表率中的性别差异。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 1;75(8):956-961. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0275.
8
The Role of PhD Faculty in Advancing Research in Departments of Surgery.博士生导师在外科各科室推进研究工作中的作用。
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):111-115. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001657.
9
Trends in Academic Spine Neurosurgeon Productivity as Measured by the Relative Citation Ratio.相对引文比衡量的学术脊柱神经外科医生生产力趋势。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Mar;147:e40-e46. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.11.097. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
Minority faculty members' resilience and academic productivity: are they related?少数族裔教职员工的适应力和学术生产力:两者是否相关?
Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1492-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181df12a9.

引用本文的文献

1
The gender gap in academic anesthesiology and critical care medicine: a systematic review.麻醉学与重症医学领域的性别差距:一项系统综述。
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Jan;72(1):75-90. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02897-w. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
2
Diversity in the pediatric research workforce: a scoping review of the literature.儿科研究人员队伍的多样性:文献综述
Pediatr Res. 2023 Sep;94(3):904-914. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02603-4. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Gender Differences in Research Productivity among Academic Psychiatrists in Canada.加拿大学术精神科医生研究成果中的性别差异。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;64(6):415-422. doi: 10.1177/0706743718802798. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Gender disparity in academic emergency radiology.学术急诊放射学中的性别差异。
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Feb;26(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1642-7. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
Competing Risks Analysis of Promotion and Attrition in Academic Medicine: A National Study of U.S. Medical School Graduates.学术医学中的晋升和离职的竞争风险分析:一项对美国医学院毕业生的全国性研究。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):227-236. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002441.
6
Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.学术医学中心初级教员获得美国国立卫生研究院R01资助的性别差异:人脉、职级和研究生产力的作用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;26(10):1086-1093. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6102. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
Variability in Women Faculty's Preferences Regarding Mentor Similarity: A Multi-Institution Study in Academic Medicine.女性教员对导师相似性偏好的差异:一项学术医学领域的多机构研究。
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1108-18. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001284.
8
Faculty Promotion and Attrition: The Importance of Coauthor Network Reach at an Academic Medical Center.教员晋升与人员流失:学术医疗中心共同作者网络影响力的重要性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jan;31(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3463-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The use and significance of a research networking system.研究网络系统的用途及意义。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 7;16(2):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3137.
2
Measuring faculty retention and success in academic medicine.测量学术医学中的教师保留率和成功率。
Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1046-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825d0d31.
3
Why are a quarter of faculty considering leaving academic medicine? A study of their perceptions of institutional culture and intentions to leave at 26 representative U.S. medical schools.为什么有四分之一的教职员工考虑离开学术医学领域?对美国 26 所代表性医学院校的机构文化认知和离职意向的研究。
Acad Med. 2012 Jul;87(7):859-69. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182582b18.
4
Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.种族、民族与 NIH 研究奖项。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1015-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1196783.
5
Women faculty: an analysis of their experiences in academic medicine and their coping strategies.女性教员:对她们在学术医学领域的经历及其应对策略的分析。
Gend Med. 2010 Oct;7(5):438-50. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2010.09.006.
6
Predictors of job satisfaction among academic faculty members: do instructional and clinical staff differ?学术教职员工工作满意度的预测因素:教学人员和临床人员有区别吗?
Med Educ. 2010 Oct;44(10):985-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03766.x.
7
Primary care specialty choices of United States medical graduates, 1997-2006.美国医学毕业生对初级保健专业的选择,1997-2006 年。
Acad Med. 2010 Jun;85(6):947-58. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dbe77d.
8
The culture of academic medicine: faculty perceptions of the lack of alignment between individual and institutional values.学术医学文化:教职员工对个人和机构价值观之间缺乏一致性的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Dec;24(12):1289-95. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1131-5. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
9
Physician career satisfaction within specialties.医学专业领域的医生职业满意度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 16;9:166. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-166.
10
Improving the retention of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine.提高医学学术领域中代表性不足的少数族裔教员的留任率。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Sep;98(9):1435-40.

考量学术医学中的背景因素:七个临床科室在人口统计学和专业特征、研究生产力以及进步指标方面的差异。

Considering context in academic medicine: differences in demographic and professional characteristics and in research productivity and advancement metrics across seven clinical departments.

作者信息

Warner Erica T, Carapinha René, Weber Griffin M, Hill Emorcia V, Reede Joan Y

机构信息

E.T. Warner is research associate, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, and instructor in medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. R. Carapinha is research and program manager, Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, and postdoctoral fellow, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. G.M. Weber is assistant professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, and director, Biomedical Research Informatics Core, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. E.V. Hill is director of research and evaluation, Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. J.Y. Reede is dean, Office for Diversity Inclusion and Community Partnership, and associate professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, and associate professor, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2015 Aug;90(8):1077-83. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000717.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000717
PMID:25853687
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8351792/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To understand the disciplinary contexts in which faculty work, the authors examined demographics, professional characteristics, research productivity, and advancement across seven clinical departments at Harvard Medical School (HMS) and nationally.

METHOD

HMS analyses included faculty from seven clinical departments-anesthesiology, medicine, neurology, pediatrics, psychiatry, radiology, and surgery-in May 2011 (N = 7,304). National analyses included faculty at 141 U.S. medical schools in the same seven departments as of December 31, 2011 (N = 91,414). The authors used chi-square and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests to compare departmental characteristics.

RESULTS

Heterogeneity in demographics, professional characteristics, and advancement across departments was observed in HMS and national data. At HMS, psychiatry had the highest percentage of underrepresented minority faculty at 6.6% (75/1,139). In anesthesiology, 24.2% (128/530) of faculty were Asian, whereas in psychiatry only 7.9% (90/1,139) were (P < .0001). Female faculty were the majority in pediatrics and psychiatry, whereas in surgery 26.3% (172/654) of the faculty were female (P < .0001). At HMS, surgery, radiology, and neurology had the shortest median times to promotion and the highest median number of publications, H-index, and second-degree centrality. Neurology also had the highest percentage of faculty who had been principal investigators on a National Institutes of Health-funded grant.

CONCLUSIONS

There were differences in demographics, professional characteristics, and advancement across clinical departments at HMS and nationally. The context in which faculty work, of which department is a proxy, should be accounted for in research on faculty career outcomes and diversity inclusion in academic medicine.

摘要

目的

为了解教师工作所在的学科背景,作者对哈佛医学院(HMS)及全国范围内七个临床科室的人员构成、专业特征、研究产出及职业晋升情况进行了调查。

方法

HMS的分析涵盖了2011年5月七个临床科室(麻醉科、内科、神经科、儿科、精神科、放射科和外科)的教师(N = 7304)。全国范围的分析纳入了截至2011年12月31日,来自141所美国医学院校相同七个科室的教师(N = 91414)。作者使用卡方检验和威尔科克森-曼-惠特尼检验来比较各科室的特征。

结果

在HMS及全国数据中,各科室在人员构成、专业特征和职业晋升方面均存在异质性。在HMS,精神科未被充分代表的少数族裔教师比例最高,为6.6%(75/1139)。在麻醉科,24.2%(128/530)的教师为亚洲人,而在精神科只有7.9%(90/1139)是亚洲人(P <.0001)。儿科和精神科的女性教师占多数,而在外科,26.3%(172/654)的教师为女性(P <.0001)。在HMS,外科、放射科和神经科的晋升中位时间最短,发表论文的中位数量、H指数和二阶中心性最高。神经科担任美国国立卫生研究院资助项目首席研究员的教师比例也最高。

结论

HMS及全国范围内各临床科室在人员构成、专业特征和职业晋升方面存在差异。在研究教师职业成果及学术医学中的多元化包容时,应考虑教师工作的背景,其中科室可作为一个代表因素。