• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别、种族/族裔与美国国立卫生研究院R01研究奖:有色人种女性是否存在双重束缚的证据?

Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research Awards: Is There Evidence of a Double Bind for Women of Color?

作者信息

Ginther Donna K, Kahn Shulamit, Schaffer Walter T

机构信息

D.K. Ginther is professor, Department of Economics, and director, Center for Science, Technology & Economic Policy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, and research associate, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts. S. Kahn is associate professor, Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Questrom School of Business, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. W.T. Schaffer is senior scientific advisor, Division of Biomedical Workforce, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1098-107. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001278.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001278
PMID:27306969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4965301/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the relationship between gender, race/ethnicity, and the probability of being awarded an R01 grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

METHOD

The authors used data from the NIH Information for Management, Planning, Analysis, and Coordination grants management database for the years 2000-2006 to examine gender differences and race/ethnicity-specific gender differences in the probability of receiving an R01 Type 1 award. The authors used descriptive statistics and probit models to determine the relationship between gender, race/ethnicity, degree, investigator experience, and R01 award probability, controlling for a large set of observable characteristics.

RESULTS

White women PhDs and MDs were as likely as white men to receive an R01 award. Compared with white women, Asian and black women PhDs and black women MDs were significantly less likely to receive funding. Women submitted fewer grant applications, and blacks and women who were new investigators were more likely to submit only one application between 2000 and 2006.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences by race/ethnicity explain the NIH funding gap for women of color, as white women have a slight advantage over men in receiving Type 1 awards. Findings of a lower submission rate for women and an increased likelihood that they will submit only one proposal are consistent with research showing that women avoid competition. Policies designed to address the racial and ethnic diversity of the biomedical workforce have the potential to improve funding outcomes for women of color.

摘要

目的

分析性别、种族/族裔与获得美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)R01资助可能性之间的关系。

方法

作者使用了NIH管理、规划、分析与协调资助管理数据库2000 - 2006年的数据,以研究获得R01一类资助可能性中的性别差异以及特定种族/族裔的性别差异。作者使用描述性统计和概率模型来确定性别、种族/族裔、学位、研究者经验与R01资助可能性之间的关系,并控制了大量可观察特征。

结果

白人女性博士和医学博士获得R01资助的可能性与白人男性相同。与白人女性相比,亚裔和黑人女性博士以及黑人女性医学博士获得资助的可能性显著更低。女性提交的资助申请较少,2000年至2006年间,黑人以及新入职的女性研究者更有可能只提交一份申请。

结论

种族/族裔差异解释了有色人种女性在NIH资助方面的差距,因为白人女性在获得一类资助方面比男性略有优势。女性提交率较低且更有可能只提交一份申请的结果与表明女性避免竞争的研究一致。旨在解决生物医学劳动力种族和族裔多样性问题的政策有可能改善有色人种女性的资助结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4965301/657ff27f681d/nihms785777f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4965301/f4487389b0cc/nihms785777f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4965301/657ff27f681d/nihms785777f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4965301/f4487389b0cc/nihms785777f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7288/4965301/657ff27f681d/nihms785777f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research Awards: Is There Evidence of a Double Bind for Women of Color?性别、种族/族裔与美国国立卫生研究院R01研究奖:有色人种女性是否存在双重束缚的证据?
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1098-107. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001278.
2
Are race, ethnicity, and medical school affiliation associated with NIH R01 type 1 award probability for physician investigators?种族、民族和医学院校隶属关系是否与 NIH R01 类型 1 医师研究员奖的概率有关?
Acad Med. 2012 Nov;87(11):1516-24. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826d726b.
3
Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.种族、民族与 NIH 研究奖项。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1015-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1196783.
4
Uncovering Disparities in Scholarly Productivity among Junior Surgical Society Grant Recipients.揭示青年外科学会资助获得者学术产出差异
J Surg Res. 2021 Jan;257:128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.057. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
5
Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research awards.出版物作为 NIH 研究奖项中种族和民族差异的预测指标。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0205929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205929. eCollection 2018.
6
Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.学术医学中心初级教员获得美国国立卫生研究院R01资助的性别差异:人脉、职级和研究生产力的作用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;26(10):1086-1093. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6102. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
7
Gender, Racial, and Ethnic and Inequities in Receipt of Multiple National Institutes of Health Research Project Grants.性别、种族和民族在获得多项美国国立卫生研究院研究项目资助方面的不平等现象。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230855. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0855.
8
A Ten-Year Analysis of Recent National Institutes of Health Funding for Anesthesiology Research in United States Medical Schools.美国医学院麻醉学研究中近期美国国立卫生研究院资助的十年分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Jul;36(7):1844-1855. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.008. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
Physician-scientists in obstetrics and gynecology: predictors of success in obtaining independent research funding.妇产科领域的医师科学家:获得独立研究资金成功与否的预测因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):84.e1-84.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
10
Award rate inequities in biomedical research.医学研究中的奖励率不公平现象。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 1;17(7):e0270612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270612. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
"Not Knowing that I Could Get Addicted at Any Moment": Drug Use Initiation Narratives among Black Americans.“不知自己随时可能上瘾”:美国黑人中的吸毒起始经历叙述
Qual Psychol. 2024 Dec 16. doi: 10.1037/qup0000325.
2
Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study.同行评审面临的威胁:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 20;15(2):e091666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091666.
3
The differential impacts of team diversity as variability versus atypicality on team effectiveness.团队多样性作为变异性与非典型性对团队效能的不同影响。

本文引用的文献

1
A quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institution.对某一机构研究人员的美国国立卫生研究院 R01 申请评审的定量语言分析。
Acad Med. 2015 Jan;90(1):69-75. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000442.
2
Are race, ethnicity, and medical school affiliation associated with NIH R01 type 1 award probability for physician investigators?种族、民族和医学院校隶属关系是否与 NIH R01 类型 1 医师研究员奖的概率有关?
Acad Med. 2012 Nov;87(11):1516-24. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826d726b.
3
Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 6;15(1):4461. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86483-0.
4
Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Cardiology Physicians and Fellows in Training.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者及酷儿心脏病学医生和实习研究员的经历。
JACC Adv. 2025 Jan 8;4(2):101545. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101545. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Black women in HIV research: Intersectionality, positionality and our commitment to build a just research enterprise.从事艾滋病病毒研究的黑人女性:交叉性、位置性以及我们致力于建立一个公正研究事业的承诺。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241305071. doi: 10.1177/17455057241305071.
6
Increasing diversity in the nutrition, obesity, and diabetes biomedical workforce: the BRIDGES consortium.增加营养、肥胖和糖尿病生物医学领域劳动力的多样性:BRIDGES联盟。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Feb;121(2):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.011. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
7
Mentoring Early-Career Investigators of HIV/STI Health Disparities Research: A Study Examining the CAPS Visiting Professors Program.指导早期职业的艾滋病毒/性传播感染健康差异研究调查人员:一项关于CAPS客座教授计划的研究
Health Educ Behav. 2025 Apr;52(2):207-218. doi: 10.1177/10901981241294245. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
8
Research for all: building a diverse researcher community for the All of Us Research Program.为所有人开展研究:为“我们所有人研究计划”建立多元化的研究人员群体。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):38-50. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae270.
9
Biomedical research grant resubmission: rates and factors related to success - a scoping review.生物医学研究资助项目的重新提交:成功率及相关因素——一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e089927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089927.
10
Evaluating a National Biomedical Training Program Using QuantCrit: Revealing Disparities in Research Self-efficacy for Women of Color Undergraduates.使用 QuantCrit 评估国家生物医学培训计划:揭示有色人种女性本科生研究自我效能的差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0047.
种族、民族与 NIH 研究奖项。
Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):1015-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1196783.
4
Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs.美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)外科学基金项目申请、成功率和资助率的性别差异。
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):759-67. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821836ff.
5
Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications.社会学。美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助申请中的性别差距。
Science. 2008 Dec 5;322(5907):1472-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1165878.
6
NIH budget. Peer review under stress.美国国立卫生研究院预算。压力下的同行评审。
Science. 2007 Apr 20;316(5823):358-9. doi: 10.1126/science.316.5823.358.
7
A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.空气中的威胁。刻板印象如何塑造智力认同与表现。
Am Psychol. 1997 Jun;52(6):613-29. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.52.6.613.