Tshikudi Diane M, Tripathi Markandey M, Hajjarian Zeinab, Van Cott Elizabeth M, Nadkarni Seemantini K
Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182491. eCollection 2017.
Anticoagulant overdose is associated with major bleeding complications. Rapid coagulation sensing may ensure safe and accurate anticoagulant dosing and reduce bleeding risk. Here, we report the novel use of Laser Speckle Rheology (LSR) for measuring anticoagulation and haemodilution status in whole blood. In the LSR approach, blood from 12 patients and 4 swine was placed in disposable cartridges and time-varying intensity fluctuations of laser speckle patterns were measured to quantify the viscoelastic modulus during clotting. Coagulation parameters, mainly clotting time, clot progression rate (α-angle) and maximum clot stiffness (MA) were derived from the clot viscoelasticity trace and compared with standard Thromboelastography (TEG). To demonstrate the capability for anticoagulation sensing in patients, blood samples from 12 patients treated with warfarin anticoagulant were analyzed. LSR clotting time correlated with prothrombin and activated partial thromboplastin time (r = 0.57-0.77, p<0.04) and all LSR parameters demonstrated good correlation with TEG (r = 0.61-0.87, p<0.04). To further evaluate the dose-dependent sensitivity of LSR parameters, swine blood was spiked with varying concentrations of heparin, argatroban and rivaroxaban or serially diluted with saline. We observed that anticoagulant treatments prolonged LSR clotting time in a dose-dependent manner that correlated closely with TEG (r = 0.99, p<0.01). LSR angle was unaltered by anticoagulation whereas TEG angle presented dose-dependent diminution likely linked to the mechanical manipulation of the clot. In both LSR and TEG, MA was largely unaffected by anticoagulation, and LSR presented a higher sensitivity to increased haemodilution in comparison to TEG (p<0.01). Our results establish that LSR rapidly and accurately measures the response of various anticoagulants, opening the opportunity for routine anticoagulation monitoring at the point-of-care or for patient self-testing.
抗凝药物过量与严重出血并发症相关。快速凝血检测可确保抗凝药物剂量安全准确,并降低出血风险。在此,我们报告了激光散斑流变学(LSR)在测量全血抗凝和血液稀释状态方面的新用途。在LSR方法中,将12名患者和4头猪的血液置于一次性药筒中,测量激光散斑图案随时间变化的强度波动,以量化凝血过程中的粘弹性模量。从凝血粘弹性曲线得出凝血参数,主要是凝血时间、凝血进展速率(α角)和最大凝血硬度(MA),并与标准血栓弹力图(TEG)进行比较。为证明在患者中进行抗凝检测的能力,分析了12名接受华法林抗凝治疗患者的血样。LSR凝血时间与凝血酶原时间和活化部分凝血活酶时间相关(r = 0.57 - 0.77,p<0.04),所有LSR参数与TEG均显示出良好的相关性(r = 0.61 - 0.87,p<0.04)。为进一步评估LSR参数的剂量依赖性敏感性,用不同浓度的肝素、阿加曲班和利伐沙班对猪血液进行加样,或用生理盐水进行系列稀释。我们观察到抗凝治疗以剂量依赖方式延长LSR凝血时间,且与TEG密切相关(r = 0.99,p<0.01)。抗凝对LSR角度无影响,而TEG角度呈现剂量依赖性减小,这可能与凝块的机械操作有关。在LSR和TEG中,MA在很大程度上不受抗凝影响,并且与TEG相比,LSR对血液稀释增加表现出更高的敏感性(p<0.01)。我们的结果表明,LSR可快速准确地测量各种抗凝剂的反应,为即时护理时的常规抗凝监测或患者自我检测提供了机会。