Lee Bae Hoon, Lum Nathaniel, Seow Li Yuan, Lim Pei Qi, Tan Lay Poh
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Singapore Centre for 3D Printing (SC3DP), Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Materials (Basel). 2016 Sep 24;9(10):797. doi: 10.3390/ma9100797.
Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) has been increasingly considered as an important bioink material due to its tailorable mechanical properties, good biocompatibility, and ability to be photopolymerized in situ as well as printability. GelMA can be classified into two types: type A GelMA (a product from acid treatment) and type B GelMA (a product from alkali treatment). In current literature, there is little research on the comparison of type A GelMA and type B GelMA in terms of synthesis, rheological properties, and printability for bioink applications. Here, we report the synthesis, rheological properties, and printability of types A and B GelMA. Types A and B GelMA samples with different degrees of substitution (DS) were prepared in a controllable manner by a time-lapse loading method of methacrylic anhydride (MAA) and different feed ratios of MAA to gelatin. Type B GelMA tended to have a slightly higher DS compared to type A GelMA, especially in a lower feed ratio of MAA to gelatin. All the type A and type B GelMA solutions with different DS exhibited shear thinning behaviours at 37 °C. However, only GelMA with a high DS had an easy-to-extrude feature at room temperature. The cell-laden printed constructs of types A and B GelMA at 20% / showed around 75% cell viability.
甲基丙烯酰化明胶(GelMA)因其可定制的机械性能、良好的生物相容性、原位光聚合能力以及可打印性,越来越被视为一种重要的生物墨水材料。GelMA可分为两种类型:A型GelMA(酸处理产物)和B型GelMA(碱处理产物)。在当前文献中,关于A型GelMA和B型GelMA在生物墨水应用的合成、流变学性质和可打印性方面的比较研究很少。在此,我们报告了A型和B型GelMA的合成、流变学性质和可打印性。通过甲基丙烯酸酐(MAA)的延时加载方法以及MAA与明胶的不同进料比,以可控方式制备了具有不同取代度(DS)的A型和B型GelMA样品。与A型GelMA相比,B型GelMA的DS往往略高,尤其是在MAA与明胶的进料比更低时。所有具有不同DS的A型和B型GelMA溶液在37°C时均表现出剪切变稀行为。然而,只有高DS的GelMA在室温下具有易于挤出的特性。20%的A型和B型GelMA负载细胞的打印构建体显示出约75%的细胞活力。