Suppr超能文献

老年人收缩压测量中的观察者误差。自动记录仪是否可行?

Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?

作者信息

Hla K M, Vokaty K A, Feussner J R

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1986 Dec;146(12):2373-6.

PMID:2877645
Abstract

Measurement of systolic blood pressure (BP) in the elderly can be inaccurate due to observer errors such as terminal digit preference and expectation bias. Efforts to reduce these errors include use of trained observers, random-zero sphygmomanometers, and automatic BP recorders. To evaluate the value of an infrasonic recorder, the infrasonde, we compared simultaneous systolic BP determinations obtained directly by intra-arterial measurements, and indirectly by a standard cuff-mercury sphygmomanometer using clinic nurses (casual and serial measurements), a trained physician assistant (PA), and the Infrasonde in 36 elderly hypertensive men. All the indirect measurements correlated positively with the direct measurement. A terminal digit preference for zero occurred more frequently in the casual and serial readings compared with the Infrasonde and PA cuff readings: 45% and 51% vs 21% and 22%, respectively. Our data suggest that the Infrasonde is a reliable, alternative device for systolic BP measurement that eliminates observer biases associated with standard cuff BP recordings.

摘要

由于诸如尾数偏好和期望偏差等观察者误差,老年人收缩压(BP)的测量可能不准确。减少这些误差的措施包括使用经过培训的观察者、随机零位血压计和自动血压记录仪。为了评估次声记录仪(次声探头)的价值,我们比较了36名老年男性高血压患者通过动脉内直接测量以及由临床护士(随机和连续测量)、一名经过培训的医师助理(PA)使用标准袖带汞柱血压计间接测量,以及使用次声探头同步测定的收缩压。所有间接测量值与直接测量值均呈正相关。与次声探头和PA袖带读数相比,随机和连续读数中尾数偏好为零的情况更频繁出现:分别为45%和51%,而次声探头和PA袖带读数分别为21%和22%。我们的数据表明,次声探头是一种可靠的、可替代的收缩压测量设备,可消除与标准袖带血压记录相关的观察者偏差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验