Suppr超能文献

丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂的有效性和耐受性:一项针对亚洲中重度慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的多中心、前瞻性、开放标签研究。

Effectiveness and tolerability of transdermal buprenorphine patches: a multicenter, prospective, open-label study in Asian patients with moderate to severe chronic musculoskeletal pain.

作者信息

Yoon Do Heum, Bin Seong-Il, Chan Simon Kin-Cheong, Chung Chun Kee, In Yong, Kim Hyoungmin, Lichauco Juan Javier, Mok Chi Chiu, Moon Young-Wan, Ng Tony Kwun-Tung, Penserga Ester Gonzales, Shin Dong Ah, You Dora, Moon Hanlim

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, 134 Shinchon-dong Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 4;18(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1664-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We examined the effectiveness and tolerability of transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) treatment in real-world setting in Asian patients with musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

This was an open-label study conducted in Hong Kong, Korea, and the Philippines between June 2013 and April 2015. Eligible patients fulfilled the following criteria: 18 to 80 years of age; clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, low back pain, or joint/muscle pain; chronic non-malignant pain of moderate to severe intensity (Box-Scale-11 [BS-11] pain score ≥ 4), not adequately controlled with non-opioid analgesics and requiring an opioid for adequate analgesia; and no prior history of opioid treatment. Patients started with a 5 μg/h buprenorphine patch and were titrated as necessary to a maximum of 40 μg/h over a 6-week period to achieve optimal pain control. Patients continued treatment with the titrated dose for 11 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in BS-11 pain scores. Other endpoints included patients' sleep quality and quality of life as assessed by the 8-item Global Sleep Quality Assessment Scale (GSQA) questionnaire and the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire-3 Level version (EQ-5D-3 L), respectively. Tolerability was assessed by collecting adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 114 eligible patients were included in the analysis. The mean BS-11 score at baseline was 6.2 (SD 1.6). Following initiation of TDB, there was a statistically significant improvement in BS-11 score from baseline to visit 3 (least squares [LS] mean change: -2.27 [95% CI -2.66 to -1.87]), which was maintained till the end of the study (visit 7) (LS mean change: -2.64 [95% -3.05 to -2.23]) (p < 0.0001 for both). The proportion of patients who rated sleep quality as 'good' increased from 14.0% at baseline to 26.9% at visit 6. By visit 6, the mean EQ VAS score increased by 7.7 units (SD 17.9). There were also significant improvements in patients' levels of functioning for all EQ-5D-3 L dimensions from baseline at visit 6 (p < 0.05 for all). Seventy-eight percent of patients reported TEAEs and 22.8% of patients discontinued due to TEAEs. TEAEs were generally mild to moderate in intensity (96.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

TDB provides effective pain relief with an acceptable tolerability profile over the 11-week treatment period in Asian patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. More studies are needed to examine the long-term efficacy and safety of TBD treatment in this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01961271 . Registered 7 October 2013 (retrospectively registered; first patient was enrolled on 28 June 2013 and last patient last visit date was 26 Apr 2015).

摘要

背景

我们在现实环境中研究了透皮丁丙诺啡(TDB)治疗亚洲肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的有效性和耐受性。

方法

这是一项于2013年6月至2015年4月在香港、韩国和菲律宾开展的开放标签研究。符合条件的患者需满足以下标准:年龄在18至80岁之间;骨关节炎、类风湿关节炎、腰痛或关节/肌肉疼痛的临床诊断;中度至重度强度的慢性非恶性疼痛(Box量表-11 [BS-11]疼痛评分≥4),非阿片类镇痛药无法充分控制且需要阿片类药物以实现充分镇痛;且无阿片类药物治疗史。患者起始使用5μg/h的丁丙诺啡贴片,并在6周内根据需要滴定至最大40μg/h以实现最佳疼痛控制。患者以滴定剂量持续治疗11周。主要疗效终点为BS-11疼痛评分的变化。其他终点分别为通过8项全球睡眠质量评估量表(GSQA)问卷和欧洲五维健康量表自我报告问卷3水平版(EQ-5D-3L)评估的患者睡眠质量和生活质量。通过收集不良事件评估耐受性。

结果

共有114名符合条件的患者纳入分析。基线时的平均BS-11评分为6.2(标准差1.6)。开始使用TDB后,从基线到第3次访视时BS-11评分有统计学意义的改善(最小二乘[LS]平均变化:-2.27 [95%置信区间-2.66至-1.87]),直至研究结束(第7次访视)时仍保持该改善(LS平均变化:-2.64 [95%-3.05至-2.23])(两者p<0.0001)。将睡眠质量评为“良好”的患者比例从基线时的14.0%增至第6次访视时的26.9%。到第6次访视时,EQ视觉模拟量表(VAS)平均评分增加了7.7分(标准差17.9)。在第6次访视时,患者在所有EQ-5D-3L维度上的功能水平与基线相比也有显著改善(所有p<0.05)。78%的患者报告了治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAE),22.8%的患者因TEAE停药。TEAE一般强度为轻度至中度(96.5%)。

结论

在11周的治疗期内,TDB为亚洲慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者提供了有效的疼痛缓解,且耐受性良好。需要更多研究来考察TDB治疗该患者群体的长期疗效和安全性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01961271。于2013年10月7日注册(追溯注册;首例患者于2013年6月28日入组,最后一例患者最后一次访视日期为2015年4月26日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/923f/5545039/73e7f1d105de/12891_2017_1664_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

8
Transdermal buprenorphine in clinical practice--a post-marketing surveillance study in 13,179 patients.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Aug;21(8):1147-56. doi: 10.1185/030079905X53315.
10
Transdermal buprenorphine in non-oncological moderate-to-severe chronic pain.
Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30 Suppl 2:31-8. doi: 10.2165/1158409-S0-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

2
Analgesic effect and safety of a half-dose transdermal buprenorphine patch after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
J Orthop. 2024 Feb 15;52:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.002. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain: A Safer Alternative to Traditional Opioids.
Health Psychol Res. 2021 Aug 6;9(1):27241. doi: 10.52965/001c.27241. eCollection 2021.
4
Implications of Drug Use Disorders on Spine Surgery.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e334-e341. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.177. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Pain Control in Latin America: The Optimized Role of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Cancer and Noncancer Pain.
Pain Ther. 2019 Dec;8(2):187-201. doi: 10.1007/s40122-019-0126-0. Epub 2019 May 17.
7
Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain: a Systemic Review.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Oct 5;22(12):83. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0732-2.
8
Treating Chronic Pain: An Overview of Clinical Studies Centered on the Buprenorphine Option.
Drugs. 2018 Aug;78(12):1211-1228. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0953-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain.
CMAJ. 2017 May 8;189(18):E659-E666. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170363.
3
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1624-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1464.
4
The unique role of transdermal buprenorphine in the global chronic pain epidemic.
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2015 Jun;53(2):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
6
Update on prescription extended-release opioids and appropriate patient selection.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 Jul 23;6:265-80. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S38562. Print 2013.
7
Pharmacokinetics of transdermal buprenorphine patch in the elderly.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;69(2):143-9. doi: 10.1007/s00228-012-1320-8. Epub 2012 Jun 17.
8
Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC.
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):e58-68. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70040-2.
9
Prescription opioid abuse, pain and addiction: clinical issues and implications.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011 May;30(3):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00271.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验