Suppr超能文献

在接受丁丙诺啡或口服阿片类药物治疗的慢性腰痛患者中严重的治疗中出现的不良事件:一项回顾性商业索赔分析。

Serious treatment-emergent adverse events in chronic low back pain patients treated with buprenorphine or oral opioids: a retrospective commercial claims analysis.

机构信息

Health Economics & Outcomes Research Department, ZRx Outcomes Research Inc., Mississauga, ON L5A 2X7, Canada.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Aug;13(8):e230183. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0183. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

Abstract

Explore the safety of Belbuca® (buprenorphine buccal film), buprenorphine transdermal patches and oral opioids for chronic low back pain (cLBP) treatment. The retrospective analysis of the MarketScan Commercial database (2018-2021) included treatment-naive cLBP adults. The first date of buprenorphine (Belbuca and transdermal patch) or opioid prescription was index date. Cohorts were defined based on the index medication. Observation included a 6-month pre-index period, while post-index lasted until the end of continuous insurance coverage. There were 44 relevant treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) identified in the literature. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and incidence rate difference (IRD) were used to compare serious TEAE rates (in 1000 person-years) between cohorts. Propensity-score matching minimized the selection bias. Buprenorphine had lower rates of 15 serious TEAEs than oral opioids (all p ≤ 0.037), while higher rates only for serious dizziness (IRR 2.44, p = 0.011; driven by Belbuca), opioid abuse/dependence (IRR 3.13, p = 0.004; driven by patches) and cholecystitis (IRD 20.25, p = 0.044; an outlier). Additionally, a comparison between Belbuca and oral opioids showed lower rates of 13 serious TEAEs (all p ≤ 0.024) and a higher serious dizziness rate (IRR 3.17, p = 0.024). Although the rates of serious opioid abuse/dependence were similar (24.60 vs 26.93, p = 0.921), all Belbuca patients and none of the opioid patients had a positive history of these events. Belbuca also had lower rates of five serious TEAEs than transdermal patches (all p ≤ 0.018), including a serious opioid abuse/dependence (IRR 0.04, p < 0.001), but higher rates of serious cholecystitis (IRD 52.17, p = 0.035; an outlier) and suicidal ideation (IRD 156.50, p < 0.001; an outlier). Buprenorphine had a better safety profile than oral opioids in cLBP treatment. Belbuca showed a more favorable TEAE profile than buprenorphine transdermal patches and oral opioids.

摘要

探讨 Belbuca®(丁丙诺啡颊膜)、丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂和口服阿片类药物治疗慢性下腰痛(cLBP)的安全性。本回顾性分析使用了 MarketScan 商业数据库(2018-2021 年),纳入了治疗初发 cLBP 的成年患者。丁丙诺啡(Belbuca 和透皮贴剂)或阿片类药物处方的首次日期为索引日期。队列是根据索引药物定义的。观察包括索引前 6 个月的时期,而索引后持续到连续保险覆盖结束。文献中确定了 44 种相关的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)。使用发生率比(IRR)和发生率差异(IRD)比较队列间严重 TEAE 发生率(每 1000 人年)。倾向评分匹配最小化了选择偏倚。与口服阿片类药物相比,丁丙诺啡的 15 种严重 TEAE 发生率较低(均 p≤0.037),但严重头晕的发生率较高(IRR 2.44,p=0.011;由 Belbuca 引起)、阿片类药物滥用/依赖(IRR 3.13,p=0.004;由贴剂引起)和胆囊炎(IRD 20.25,p=0.044;异常值)。此外,与口服阿片类药物相比,Belbuca 与 13 种严重 TEAE 发生率较低(均 p≤0.024)和严重头晕发生率较高(IRR 3.17,p=0.024)。尽管严重阿片类药物滥用/依赖的发生率相似(24.60 与 26.93,p=0.921),但所有 Belbuca 患者均无此类事件的阳性史,而无一例口服阿片类药物患者有此类事件的阳性史。与丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂相比,丁丙诺啡还具有较低的五种严重 TEAE 发生率(均 p≤0.018),包括严重阿片类药物滥用/依赖(IRR 0.04,p<0.001),但严重胆囊炎(IRD 52.17,p=0.035;异常值)和自杀意念(IRD 156.50,p<0.001;异常值)发生率较高。丁丙诺啡在 cLBP 治疗中的安全性优于口服阿片类药物。与丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂和口服阿片类药物相比,Belbuca 显示出更有利的 TEAE 特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea96/11284811/d0ebd554497c/cer-13-230183-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验