Fang Yuan, Mercer Ryan G, McMullen Lynn M, Gänzle Michael G
University of Alberta, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Sep 15;83(19). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01378-17. Print 2017 Oct 1.
The prophage-encoded Shiga toxin is a major virulence factor in Stx-producing (STEC). Toxin production and phage production are linked and occur after induction of the RecA-dependent SOS response. However, food-related stress and Stx-prophage induction have not been studied at the single-cell level. This study investigated the effects of abiotic environmental stress on expression by single-cell quantification of gene expression in STEC O104:H4 Δ:::: In addition, the effect of stress on production of phage particles was determined. The lethality of stressors, including heat, HCl, lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and high hydrostatic pressure, was selected to reduce cell counts by 1 to 2 log CFU/ml. The integrity of the bacterial membrane after exposure to stress was measured by propidium iodide (PI). The fluorescent signals of green fluorescent protein (GFP) and PI were quantified by flow cytometry. The mechanism of prophage induction by stress was evaluated by relative gene expression of and cell morphology. Acid (pH < 3.5) and HO (2.5 mM) induced the expression of in about 18% and 3% of the population, respectively. The mechanism of prophage induction by acid differs from that of induction by HO HO induction but not acid induction corresponded to production of infectious phage particles, upregulation of , and cell filamentation. Pressure (200 MPa) or heat did not induce the Stx2-encoding prophage (Stx2-prophage). Overall, the quantification method developed in this study allowed investigation of prophage induction and physiological properties at the single-cell level. HO and acids mediate different pathways to induce Stx2-prophage. Induction of the Stx-prophage in STEC results in production of phage particles and Stx and thus relates to virulence as well as the transduction of virulence genes. This study developed a method for a detection of the induction of Stx-prophages at the single-cell level; membrane permeability and an indication of SOS response to environmental stress were additionally assessed. HO and mitomycin C induced expression of the prophage and activated a SOS response. In contrast, HCl and lactic acid induced the Stx-prophage but not the SOS response. The lifestyle of STEC exposes the organism to intestinal and extraintestinal environments that impose oxidative and acid stress. A more thorough understanding of the influence of food processing-related stressors on Stx-prophage expression thus facilitates control of STEC in food systems by minimizing prophage induction during food production and storage.
原噬菌体编码的志贺毒素是产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的主要毒力因子。毒素产生与噬菌体产生相关联,且在依赖RecA的SOS应答诱导后发生。然而,与食品相关的应激和Stx原噬菌体诱导尚未在单细胞水平上进行研究。本研究通过对STEC O104:H4 Δ::::基因表达进行单细胞定量,研究了非生物环境应激对其表达的影响。此外,还确定了应激对噬菌体颗粒产生的影响。选择热、盐酸、乳酸、过氧化氢和高静水压等应激源的致死率,使细胞计数降低1至2 log CFU/ml。用碘化丙啶(PI)测量应激后细菌膜的完整性。通过流式细胞术对绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)和PI的荧光信号进行定量。通过 和细胞形态的相对基因表达评估应激诱导原噬菌体的机制。酸(pH < 3.5)和H₂O₂(2.5 mM)分别在约18%和3%的群体中诱导 表达。酸诱导原噬菌体的机制与H₂O₂诱导的不同。H₂O₂诱导而非酸诱导对应于感染性噬菌体颗粒的产生、 的上调和细胞丝化。压力(200 MPa)或热未诱导编码Stx2的原噬菌体(Stx2 - 原噬菌体)。总体而言,本研究开发的定量方法允许在单细胞水平上研究原噬菌体诱导和生理特性。H₂O₂和酸介导不同途径诱导Stx2 - 原噬菌体。STEC中原噬菌体的诱导导致噬菌体颗粒和Stx的产生,因此与毒力以及毒力基因的转导有关。本研究开发了一种在单细胞水平检测Stx原噬菌体诱导的方法;还额外评估了膜通透性和对环境应激的SOS应答指示。H₂O₂和丝裂霉素C诱导原噬菌体表达并激活SOS应答。相反,盐酸和乳酸诱导Stx原噬菌体但不诱导SOS应答。STEC的生活方式使该生物体暴露于施加氧化应激和酸应激的肠道和肠外环境。因此,更深入了解食品加工相关应激源对Stx原噬菌体表达的影响,有助于通过在食品生产和储存过程中最小化原噬菌体诱导来控制食品系统中的STEC。