Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, USA; Laboratory for Neuroanatomy and Cerebellar Neurobiology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA, USA.
Cortex. 2018 Mar;100:140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
In this report, we analyze the relationship between embodied cognition and current theories of the cerebellum, particularly the Dysmetria of Thought theory and the concept of the Universal Cerebellar Transform (UCT). First, we describe the UCT and the Dysmetria of Thought theories, highlight evidence supporting these hypotheses and discuss their mechanisms, functions and relevance. We then propose the following relationships. (i) The UCT strengthens embodied cognition because it provides an example of embodiment where the nature and intensity of the dependence between cognitive, affective and sensorimotor processes are defined. (ii) Conversely, embodied cognition bolsters the UCT theory because it contextualizes a cerebellum-focused theory within a general neurological theory. (iii) Embodied cognition supports the extension to other brain regions of the principles of organization of cerebral cortical connections that underlie the UCT: The notion that cytoarchitectonically determined transforms manifest via connectivity as sensorimotor, cognitive and affective functions resonates with the embodiment thesis that cognitive, affective and sensorimotor systems are interdependent. (iv) Embodied cognition might shape future definitions of the UCT because embodiment redefines the relationship between the neurological systems modulated by the UCT. We conclude by analyzing the relationship between our hypotheses and the concept of syntax and action semantics deficits in motor diseases.
在本报告中,我们分析了体现认知与当前小脑理论之间的关系,特别是思维失调理论和普遍小脑变换理论(UCT)的概念。首先,我们描述了 UCT 和思维失调理论,强调了支持这些假设的证据,并讨论了它们的机制、功能和相关性。然后,我们提出了以下关系。(i)UCT 增强了体现认知,因为它提供了一个体现的例子,其中认知、情感和感觉运动过程之间的依赖的性质和强度被定义。(ii)相反,体现认知支持 UCT 理论,因为它将一个以小脑为中心的理论置于一般神经学理论的背景下。(iii)体现认知支持将 UCT 下大脑皮质连接组织原则扩展到其他脑区:即细胞构筑决定的变换通过连接表现为感觉运动、认知和情感功能的概念,与认知、情感和感觉运动系统相互依存的体现论点相呼应。(iv)体现认知可能会影响 UCT 的未来定义,因为体现重新定义了受 UCT 调节的神经系统之间的关系。最后,我们通过分析我们的假设与运动障碍中语法和动作语义缺陷的概念之间的关系来结束。