Suppr超能文献

非裔美国抑郁症患者在初级保健就诊时的知情且以患者为中心的决策制定。

Informed and patient-centered decision-making in the primary care visits of African Americans with depression.

作者信息

Hines Anika L, Roter Debra, Ghods Dinoso Bri K, Carson Kathryn A, Daumit Gail L, Cooper Lisa A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined the prevalence and extent of informed decision-making (IDM) and patient-centered decision-making (PCDM) in primary care visits of African Americans with depression.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of audiotaped clinical encounters and post-visit surveys of 76 patients and their clinicians. We used RIAS to characterize patient-centeredness of visit dialogue. IDM entailed discussion of 3 components: the nature of the decision, alternatives, and pros/cons. PCDM entailed discussion of: lifestyle/coping strategies, knowledge/beliefs, or treatment concerns. We examined the association of IDM and PCDM with visit duration, overall patient-centeredness, and patient/clinician interpersonal ratings.

RESULTS

Approximately one-quarter of medication and counseling decisions included essential IDM elements and 40% included at least one PCDM element. In high patient-centered visits, IDM was associated with patients feeling respected in counseling and liking clinicians in medication decisions. IDM was not related to clinician ratings. In low patient-centered visits, PCDM in counseling decisions was positively associated with patients feeling respected and clinicians respecting patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The associations between IDM and PCDM with interpersonal ratings was moderated by overall patient-centeredness of the visit, which may be indicative of broader cross-cultural communication issues.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Strengthening partnerships between depressed African Americans and their clinicians may improve patient-engaged decision-making.

摘要

目的

我们调查了非裔美国抑郁症患者在初级保健就诊中知情决策(IDM)和以患者为中心的决策(PCDM)的普及率和程度。

方法

我们对76名患者及其临床医生的录音临床会诊和就诊后调查进行了横断面分析。我们使用RIAS来描述就诊对话以患者为中心的程度。IDM包括对三个组成部分的讨论:决策的性质、替代方案以及利弊。PCDM包括对以下方面的讨论:生活方式/应对策略、知识/信念或治疗关注点。我们研究了IDM和PCDM与就诊时长、总体以患者为中心程度以及患者/临床医生人际评分之间的关联。

结果

大约四分之一的药物治疗和咨询决策包含IDM的基本要素,40%至少包含一个PCDM要素。在高度以患者为中心的就诊中,IDM与患者在咨询中感到受尊重以及在药物治疗决策中喜欢临床医生相关。IDM与临床医生评分无关。在低以患者为中心的就诊中,咨询决策中的PCDM与患者感到受尊重以及临床医生尊重患者呈正相关。

结论

IDM和PCDM与人际评分之间的关联受就诊总体以患者为中心程度的调节,这可能表明存在更广泛的跨文化沟通问题。

实践意义

加强非裔美国抑郁症患者与其临床医生之间的合作关系可能会改善患者参与的决策制定。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验