Suppr超能文献

医患关于结直肠癌筛查的讨论:谁主动开展知情决策的要素?

Patient-provider discussions about colorectal cancer screening: who initiates elements of informed decision making?

机构信息

College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Columbus, OH 43201, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep;27(9):1135-41. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2045-1. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low among low-income minority populations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate informed decision making (IDM) elements about CRC screening among low-income minority patients.

DESIGN

Observational data were collected as part of a patient-level randomized controlled trial to improve CRC screening rates. Medical visits (November 2007 to May 2010) were audio-taped and coded for IDM elements about CRC screening. Near the end of the study one provider refused recording of patients' visits (33 of 270 patients). Among all patients in the trial, agreement to be audio taped was 43.5 % (103/237). Evaluable patient (n = 100) visits were assessed for CRC screening discussion occurrence, IDM elements, and who initiated discussion of each IDM element.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were African American (72.2 %), female (63.7 %), with annual household incomes <$20,000 (60.7 %), without health insurance (57.0 %), and limited health literacy (53.7 %).

KEY RESULTS

Although CRC screening was mentioned during 48 (48 %) visits, no further discussion about screening occurred in 23 visits (19 times mentioned by the participant with no response from providers). During any visit, the maximum number of IDM elements was five; however, only two visits included five elements. The most common IDM element discussed in addition to the nature of the decision was the assessment of the patient's understanding in 16 (33.3 %) of the visits that included a CRC discussion.

CONCLUSIONS

A patient activation intervention initiated CRC screening discussions with health care providers; however, limited IDM occurred about CRC screening during medical visits of minority and low-income patients.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率在低收入少数民族人群中仍然较低。

目的

评估低收入少数民族患者 CRC 筛查的知情决策(IDM)要素。

设计

观察性数据是作为提高 CRC 筛查率的患者水平随机对照试验的一部分收集的。医疗访问(2007 年 11 月至 2010 年 5 月)被录音并对 CRC 筛查的 IDM 要素进行编码。在研究接近尾声时,一名医生拒绝记录患者的就诊(270 名患者中的 33 名)。在试验中的所有患者中,同意录音的比例为 43.5%(237 名中的 103 名)。评估了试验中可评估患者(n=100)就诊时 CRC 筛查讨论的发生情况、IDM 要素以及每个 IDM 要素的讨论发起者。

参与者

患者为非裔美国人(72.2%)、女性(63.7%),年收入<20000 美元(60.7%),没有健康保险(57.0%),健康素养有限(53.7%)。

主要结果

尽管在 48 次就诊中提到了 CRC 筛查,但在 23 次就诊中没有进一步讨论筛查(23 次是由参与者提出的,没有得到提供者的回应)。在任何一次就诊中,IDM 要素的最大数量为五个;然而,只有两次就诊包含五个要素。除了决策的性质外,在包括 CRC 讨论的 16 次就诊中(占 33.3%),讨论最多的 IDM 要素是评估患者的理解能力。

结论

患者激活干预措施启动了与医疗保健提供者的 CRC 筛查讨论;然而,在少数民族和低收入患者的医疗就诊中,关于 CRC 筛查的 IDM 内容有限。

相似文献

1
Patient-provider discussions about colorectal cancer screening: who initiates elements of informed decision making?
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep;27(9):1135-41. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2045-1. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
2
Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817dc496.
3
Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
6
7
Patient-rated importance and receipt of information for colorectal cancer screening.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2168-73. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0281. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
8
Informed and patient-centered decision-making in the primary care visits of African Americans with depression.
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
9
Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening.
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Sep;80(3):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
10
Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey.
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5 Suppl):53S-64S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10378701.

引用本文的文献

3
Impact of a literacy-sensitive intervention on CRC screening knowledge, attitudes, and intention to screen.
J Community Support Oncol. 2016 Oct;14(10):420-426. doi: 10.12788/jcso.0209.
4
Physician Intervention and Chinese Americans' Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Am J Health Behav. 2018 Jan 1;42(1):13-26. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.42.1.2.
8
Risk assessment and clinical decision making for colorectal cancer screening.
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1327-38. doi: 10.1111/hex.12110. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
10
Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):45-52. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0815. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
2
State disparities in colorectal cancer mortality patterns in the United States.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jul;20(7):1296-302. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0250.
4
Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Aug;20(8):1611-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0220. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
6
Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar;20(3):509-21. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0749. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
8
Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey.
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5 Suppl):53S-64S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10378701.
9
Is discussion of colorectal cancer screening options associated with heightened patient confusion?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Nov;19(11):2821-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0695. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
10
Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening.
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Sep;80(3):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验